Confused about BMR and TDEE

perfect10isha
perfect10isha Posts: 200 Member
edited December 18 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm 5'6" and as of today weight 142, 32 year old female. So the past 3 weeks I had been stuck at 144 lbs. I stopped working out three weeks due to returning to work from maternity leave and adjusting to my new schedule. I'm confused because I've been eating about 1550 calories a day for the past 3 weeks and the scale didn't move. The last couple days and last weekend I had high calorie days, probably closer to 1700-2000 calories a day. And today I step on the scale and I'm 2 lbs lighter. If I"m eating between my BMR and TDEE (1441-1921) I should have been losing the last three weeks right? I guess my question is if my recent spike in calories resulted in weight loss could I be eating too few calories?? Maybe I've underestimated how active I am, I chose lightly active, but between walking all over my college campus and running after two kids, is it possible I need to simply up my calories?

I thought I had it all figured out once I started reading up on BMR and TDEE on MFP but now I'm just not sure... thoughts anyone??

Replies

  • perfect10isha
    perfect10isha Posts: 200 Member
    bump... anyone??
  • Gloria67648
    Gloria67648 Posts: 108 Member
    I've used fitnessfrog to figure out tdee and fat2fit to figure out bmr. I upped my calories so as not to eat below my bmr. I really think that eating too few calories slows weight loss. I know as a mom that getting enough sleep is a challenge especially after you go back to work. Play with your numbers. Good luck
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    If I"m eating between my BMR and TDEE (1441-1921) I should have been losing the last three weeks right?

    yes you should, but the BMR is only an estimate in the first place and the 33% factor for activity level to your TDEE may not be spot on either.

    The difference between 1800 and 1921 for example is only 6.7%.
This discussion has been closed.