Confused about the MFP exercise calories counter
![phoenixgirl81](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/2fab/0337/d60b/6b08/9eec/ab54/5343/4efd3f43ec0b60710d9f1253dc314c3a6aad.jpg)
phoenixgirl81
Posts: 309 Member
Ok, so I'm all very new to this whole MFP thing and I know that sometimes the food database can be inaccurate due to people adding to the database with incorrect/incomplete data...but is the same true for the exercise tab?
For instance, I've been trusing that when I walk around my street or through the bush or whatever at 3 miles an hour or 4 miles an hour (based on known distance and the time it took me to walk it) that the calories burned in the database has been accurate. However, today I went to the gym for the first time in around 5 years and I used the fandangled equipment where I had to enter my weight before I started so it could calculate my calories exerted accurately...and when I compared the same distance and same speed on the treadmill as walking around my area and the treadmill has me at HALF the calories burned that MFP does! Which do I trust?
For instance, I've been trusing that when I walk around my street or through the bush or whatever at 3 miles an hour or 4 miles an hour (based on known distance and the time it took me to walk it) that the calories burned in the database has been accurate. However, today I went to the gym for the first time in around 5 years and I used the fandangled equipment where I had to enter my weight before I started so it could calculate my calories exerted accurately...and when I compared the same distance and same speed on the treadmill as walking around my area and the treadmill has me at HALF the calories burned that MFP does! Which do I trust?
0
Replies
-
the mfp estimates are just that. a hrm is a worthwhile investment.0
-
Excuse my ignorance... HRM = "heart rate monitor", yes?
And what do they do? Other than monitory your heart rate?
I'm TOTALLY new to all this. And having rheumatoid arthritis I have never investigated those things because I always assumed they were for the "serious" exercisers...0 -
they can be used to calculate calorie burn. they're still an estimate, but a better, more individualized estimate.0
-
I'm not a serious exerciser and I love mine. Mfp and gym equiptment were WAY off for me :-) I bought mine (polar ft4) on Amazon for 50 bucks. Its addicting lol when I'm working out and watching it I push harder than without it for sure. I love watching the calorie number go up :-)0
-
I've found that the MFP database entries are hit & miss - sometimes it estimates way over & sometimes way under - probably because the database can't tell the intensity of the exercise you are doing or your own level of fitness. Walking for 10 minutes in perfect conditions on a smooth flat surface will burn less cals that walking for 10 into a howling gale, uphill on a rocky path.
Gym equipment, if it has a built in heart rate monitor will give a better estimate than one without. The closest estimate you will get is with a personal heart rate monitor with a chest strap - this is still going to be an estimate but I don't think it's possible or feasible to be 100% on what you eat and what you burn. HTH!0 -
Thank you!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 439 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions