Good sugars vs. bad sugars?
ItsDiana
Posts: 60
I'm watching my sugar intake, but as I eat at least 2 pieces of fruit a day, I tend to get over it a lot! Isn't there a difference between good sugars (fruits, vegetables) and bad sugars (soda's, sweets etc.)?
0
Replies
-
Sugar is broken down the same exact way in the body regardless of source.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
The glycemic index (GI) is a ranking of carbohydrates on a scale from 0 to 100 according to the extent to which they raise blood sugar levels after eating. Foods with a high GI are those which are rapidly digested and absorbed and result in marked fluctuations in blood sugar levels. Low-GI foods, by virtue of their slow digestion and absorption, produce gradual rises in blood sugar and insulin levels, and have proven benefits for health. Low GI diets have been shown to improve both glucose and lipid levels in people with diabetes (type 1 and type 2). They have benefits for weight control because they help control appetite and delay hunger. Low GI diets also reduce insulin levels and insulin resistance.
Recent studies from Harvard School of Public Health indicate that the risks of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease are strongly related to the GI of the overall diet. In 1999, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) recommended that people in industrialised countries base their diets on low-GI foods in order to prevent the most common diseases of affluence, such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and obesity.
all about the good the bad and the worst sugars!
http://www.glycemicindex.com/index.php0 -
i thought fruits and veggies had better sugars, but i guess i dont really know..good luck0
-
Sugar is sugar. However when you eat fruits you get other nutrients like fiber that help slow down the digestive process and satiate you to keep you from overeating it. The problem is really processed sugary foods or straight sugar without the other nutrients (ie. soda). With processed foods you get lots of sugar, often with bad fats (trans of omega-6), and other chemicals along with it.0
-
As long as you track your intake, then it does not matter.0
-
I know they say that all sugars are broken down the same. It is true...but think about how you get that sugar. I always go over in sugar due to fruit. I would feel MUCH better knowing my sugar is in the red because I ate an apple when I was hungry as opposed to a McFlurry. Sugar is the one thing I don't worry about as I know that most of the time it is do to healthy food choices. Maybe I am wrong to think this way, but I do. Suggestions to my train of thought are welcome.0
-
-
It's not the sugar itself that matters, it's what comes with it0
-
So am I doing my 2.5 year old a disservice by giving him fruit at snack time?
Is it spiking his blood sugar like a cookie or candy would?0 -
I track, but don't really concern myself with, natural sugars from fruits and vegetables. I eat two apples almost every day...I'm always over on my sugars. I'm still losing and the added nutrients and fiber are a huge help.
Besides, I'd rather enjoy the natural sugars from fruit and feel good about my eating than go nuts on "bad" sugars and feel disgusting -- because that's what happens when I DO overindulge on them.
It's all about choices. Just make good ones. :drinker:0 -
The sugars concerned are usually fructose, glucose and sucrose. You'll find the same molecules in fruit as soda as candy as......0
-
So am I doing my 2.5 year old a disservice by giving him fruit at snack time?
Is it spiking his blood sugar like a cookie or candy would?
depends what the fruit and the cookie are. The glycemic index linked above is a measure of how fast the sugar and other carbohydrates in the food become glucose in the blood.
Berries for example are fairly low sugar / low carb and fairly low glycemic index. A melon or a banana probably isn't either.0 -
It's not the sugar itself that matters, it's what comes with it
or doesn't come with it0 -
GI of a food is very misleading and for the most part irrelevent. If I eat an average piece of watermelon (portion) which is considered a high GI food the total amount of sugar and the impact it has on insulin is minimal when compared to pasta which is a low GI food.......as far as insulin response is concerned it's the total amount of carbs in a single meal that is the main factor, and where these carbs come from (low or high GI food) really doesn't matter, especially when in combination of other foods that will be consumed in conjunction with those carbs. The reference to diseases of influence is about the SAD diet and it's shortcomings and shouldn't specifically demonize 1 particular food based on it's GI, in my opinion.0
-
depends what the fruit and the cookie are. The glycemic index linked above is a measure of how fast the sugar and other carbohydrates in the food become glucose in the blood.
Why should we be concerned about acute affects in the post feeding period?0 -
Why should we be concerned about acute affects in the post feeding period?
Pass, the lady asked if fruit would cause a sugar spike.0 -
This report covers the UK recommendations for diet:
http://www.fdf.org.uk/publicgeneral/gdas_science_jul09.pdf
The take home message is that you can and should eat your 5-A-Day portions of fruit and veg without worrying about the sugar content, as they are intrinsic sugars and not Non-Milk-Extrinsic-Sugars (NMES) which really need to be limited. They recommend 19% of your diet coming from Sugars with a max of 10% from NMES and the other 9% coming from Milk and Intrinsic sugars (note fruit juice is an extrinsic sugar as the sugar is no longer bound into the fabric of the fruit and is digested really quickly as a result). This is a lot higher than the 8% total sugar MFP recommend which is far too restrictive in my mind.0 -
GI of a food is very misleading
I find the numbers quite useful, but I agree that the use of "low" and similar words are misleading.0 -
GI of a food is very misleading
I find the numbers quite useful
So does every association that uses the GI for leverage.0 -
the lady asked if some sugars are worse than others , and by the way some foods effect your blood glucose levels according to the GI index there is a definite difference.0
-
the lady asked if some sugars are worse than others , and by the way some foods effect your blood glucose levels according to the GI index there is a definite difference.
This is a decent read.
http://www.alanaragon.com/elements-challenging-the-validity-of-the-glycemic-index.html0 -
Thanks for explaining guys I thought fruit/veggie sugars where different (healthier) from sweets etc.!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 421 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions