Should I eat my burned calories?
Replies
-
NO you do not have to eat them back and there are several reasons you should not.
Reason one NOT to eat back those calories - aren't you working out to get a caloric benefit, in addition to building muscle? Because if you eat back the calories you eliminate the benefit
Reason two NOT to eat back those calories - MFP wildly overestimates how many calories you burned working out. So, if you eat back all of them, you may end up eating back more than you really burned.
If you must eat back calories, eat back only 30% or 50%, or whatever you want, but don't eat them all back!
So wrong! MFP already sets your calories at a deflict. If you are set at 1200 and burn 500 thats like only eating 700 cals. Thats way to low and not going to help you at all!!!! Eat them back...your body needs the fuel!0 -
Thank you, this is helpful!0
-
Hopefully, you can put a plan together that works for you. We're all different and burn at different rates. You'll know within a few weeks' time if your current method is working or not. That's the beauty of it, you can adjust as you go, either way, you're taking steps toward a better, healthier you. However you choose to get there will be just fine. I'll support ya! Feel free to add me to your list if you'd like.0
-
Just keep it simple and try to focus on your NET calories for the day on MFP. Do that and get a good quality HRM (I use a Polar) so you can get an accurate calorie burn for your workouts. Try to get your NET calories to at least 1200 every day- whether you exercise thay day or not.0
-
You likely need a lot more than at least 1200 colries a day. Use MFP to calculate your BMR. Your BMR is the number of calories your body needs to function at total rest (to keep your heart beating, to breathe, etc.). If you are eating less calories than your BMR, you may lose weight at first, but eventually you WILL enter starvation mode, and you will hit a serious weight loss plateau. On top of that, it won't be fat you are losing, but a lot of lean muscle mass as well. It's not healthy to deny yourself the calories your body needs to function.
My BMR is 1560 cal/day, and MFP had me eating at 1350. I have found it impossible over the last several months to move past 163 pounds. In fact I actually started to gain a little weight back. Now that I'm eating at least my BMR every day, things are starting to settle back down for me, and I feel much better. Plus I'm no longer in starvation mode, so my body isn't panicking and holding onto fat.
So to answer your question, you do not need to eat back exercise calories, UNLESS the amount of exercise you do takes your total net calories for the day below your BMR. As long as you're eating your BMR, you will lose weight and will do so in a healthy way.
As for the TDEE-15% arguments, this likely will work as well, but it's a lot less complicated to just eat your BMR. Eating BMR also let's you burn more calories per day than TDEE-15%.0 -
Well said!!!0
-
Yes....end thread.
Depends...now end thread.
0 -
Way back when I was your age we never even THOUGHT about eating back exercise calories. We lost weight. We didn't starve to death and we didn't die horribly malnourished. Sometimes I think everything has to be so over thought. Eat less. Exercise. Lose weight. Pretty simple.
Way back when I was his/her age I didn't either. Took me 30 years to reach the point where I am. I'm losing weight now, FAR more easily than I did back then and with a lot more promise of being able to finally keep it off this time.
The site is based on the fact that running a consistent deficit will yield consistent weight loss. There's an optimal range for losing weight where you are eating enough to be energetic and not feel hungry while still running a deficit.
I'm finally putting some thought into how much of a deficit I'm running, and it's finally working for me.
Your mileage may vary. I eat most or all of my exercise calories back because, after 30 years, I'm finally comfortably losing weight and doing something that I feel can convert to a sustainable lifestyle that will allow me to keep it off.0 -
I don't eat mine back, but that is becuase I already eat at my BMR. It is subjective if you do this method or not. I'm not sure what your caloric intake is, but if it's below your BMR I would eat some back in order to reach that number. If you don't know what yours is there are several sites such as fitnessfrog.com where you can find the info.0
-
I use the Jamie Eason's Livefit training and she has on the site a calorie counter that gives you calorie counter for workout days and off days. Her program is for Ladies 20-39 yrs old.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/jamie-eason-livefit-trainer-phase-2-day-56.html0 -
I try my hardest to not eat those burned calories. It just defeats the purpose of working out and burning all those calories off, in my opinion.0
-
I try my hardest to not eat those burned calories. It just defeats the purpose of working out and burning all those calories off, in my opinion.
Good luck.
The whole argument about whether or not to eat your exercise calories comes up several times a day, and usually starts a rehash of the whole argument.
I'll only say that it is the foundation upon which this website was based - set a specific caloric deficit that allows you to lose weight at a measured pace whether you exercise or not, balancing speed of weight loss against risk of messing with your metabolism and stalling weight loss.
Exercise for your health, eat at the defined caloric deficit to lose weight slowly and sustainably. Eat back your exercise calories because you are not exercising to lose weight faster, you are exercising to be healthier.
Feel free to experiment, of course, but on your journey keep your mind open to the idea of trying eating back your exercise calories if you find that your weight loss has stalled. Do a search on the forums for "metabolism reset". It comes up fairly often when "faster weight loss" turns into a multi-month plateau.
I honestly hope it never happens to you - really. But keep an open mind to it if you hit a long plateau, and/or start feeling tired or hungry all the time.0 -
Way back when I was your age we never even THOUGHT about eating back exercise calories. We lost weight. We didn't starve to death and we didn't die horribly malnourished. Sometimes I think everything has to be so over thought. Eat less. Exercise. Lose weight. Pretty simple.
I'm with you. Maybe if you are under 40, you can eat your exercise calories. The rules change as you age and you have to find out what works. Eating back mine erases my workout. And I'm NOT going to erase my hard work. Yeah, maybe I'd still lose.....an ounce a week. And that's not for me. I'd rather lose 1 to 1.5 pounds/week. Some weeks that doesn't even happen. So I will not eat my exercise calories. I called them 'banked' so I don't get suicidal when I do have a weak day and cheat! like we all do....0 -
NO...You should never eat overcooked calories...That's nasty....0
-
Because you didnt use the Search Feature.
There are 2 paths. Choose one. If it works go until it doesnt. then change.0 -
I use it like a safety net. If i dont feel like eating them back I dont. If im neutral about it i dont. If im hungry than I do. It gives you room to be flexible.0
-
I'm under the impression that if you account for the exercise you do during your week in your settings then the additional calories burned are already accounted for and therefore should not be eaten back.
On the other hand, if you use sedentary then anything you do over and above are bonus calories and can be eaten back even if not all of them.
Is this right?0 -
YES eat your exercise calories back!!!
Like other people have said, think of it as fuelling your body.
I eat back all of mine and I am still losing weight, just try to eat healthy.
Only thing I would recommend is getting a HRM or something similar that will calculate your actual calories burned... mFP does tend to over estimate how many are burned. It's not far off though!
Don't listen to people who say don't eat them back... They will all be hungry! And not leading a healthy lifestyle that they will stick to for the Reston your life. That's the key... Not a quick diet fix, it should be a lifestyle change. Just do what you think is best, but think of it as "could I eat/exercise like this for the Rest of my life"?
Good luck!0 -
I'm under the impression that if you account for the exercise you do during your week in your settings then the additional calories burned are already accounted for and therefore should not be eaten back.
On the other hand, if you use sedentary then anything you do over and above are bonus calories and can be eaten back even if not all of them.
Is this right?
MFP doesn't account for your workouts.0 -
I'm about to turn 43 next week, I eat back my calories and its working fine for me. I feel MUCH better than when I first started and had this same mindset.0
-
^^^exactly^^If you search this topic, it's been answered many times.
If you have read through how MFP is set up when you started your account, you would have noticed that MFP already creates a deficit for you, regardless of exercise. Which means that even if you don't exercise you will lose weight. When you exercise, you further increase that deficit, possibly to an unhealthy level. This is why MFP tells you to eat your exercise calories back. Think of food as fuel. Your body needs fuel.0 -
oh my goodness i cant cope with this i am scared of ruining it and adding more weight by eating back calories that are too overestimated...on the other hand i dont want my metabolism to slow down or my body to store fat through not eating enough calories! either way i dont trust computer generated guesses to make the right choice for me...our bodies are all so different! i understand the frustration a person who suffers from anorexia feels. so much to think about ! i have started thinking about these things all the time so worried about what i do !0
-
NO you do not have to eat them back and there are several reasons you should not.
Reason one NOT to eat back those calories - aren't you working out to get a caloric benefit, in addition to building muscle? Because if you eat back the calories you eliminate the benefit
Reason two NOT to eat back those calories - MFP wildly overestimates how many calories you burned working out. So, if you eat back all of them, you may end up eating back more than you really burned.
If you must eat back calories, eat back only 30% or 50%, or whatever you want, but don't eat them all back!
Reason two I can give you, and I would advise to only eat 75% for the reason you stated. Reason one however is a fallacy, as nobody is building any significant or quantifiable amount of muscle on a deficit and the reason it's recommended to eat back your calories is to preserve your lean mass throughout your weight loss.0 -
If you do not eat them back your metabolism slows down and you don't get enough calories for the day so this is when your weight loss plateaus. The so called starvation mode sets in. your body will automatically begin to hold on to any calorie that enters the body. Do try to eat your calories back in the lowest fat foods possible for the best results, steamed veggies for example.0
-
I'm under the impression that if you account for the exercise you do during your week in your settings then the additional calories burned are already accounted for and therefore should not be eaten back.
On the other hand, if you use sedentary then anything you do over and above are bonus calories and can be eaten back even if not all of them.
Is this right?
MFP doesn't account for your workouts.
I did not know this...thank you.0 -
Way back when I was your age we never even THOUGHT about eating back exercise calories. We lost weight. We didn't starve to death and we didn't die horribly malnourished. Sometimes I think everything has to be so over thought. Eat less. Exercise. Lose weight. Pretty simple.
I'm with you. Maybe if you are under 40, you can eat your exercise calories. The rules change as you age and you have to find out what works. Eating back mine erases my workout. And I'm NOT going to erase my hard work. Yeah, maybe I'd still lose.....an ounce a week. And that's not for me. I'd rather lose 1 to 1.5 pounds/week. Some weeks that doesn't even happen. So I will not eat my exercise calories. I called them 'banked' so I don't get suicidal when I do have a weak day and cheat! like we all do....
Uhhhhh nope the rules do not change in this regard - the concept is still the same - you will have a deficit built in already, which takes into account your age. I effectively eat my calories back, lose a lb a week and am over 40. Also, it you eat them back and call it a 'cheat day' or eat them back in a more premeditated way - you are still eating them back.0 -
I also bought an HRM, but according to mine, the calories I burn are more than the calculations that MFP gives me, by quite a bit actually.0
-
I eat most of them back and I continue to lose weight each week... I'm down 28 pounds in less than 4 months. I'm in a healthy BMI range now and just trying to shed my last belly fat... I highly recommend that you eat what you burn. You are already starting at a several hundred per day calorie deficit. Why would you want to be hungry? Why would you want your body to run on fumes all the time? It is not necessary. Eat a balanced diet, and don't deprive yourself treats. That way you are more likely to stick with it... This should be a new way of life, not a quick fix.0
-
I'm under the impression that if you account for the exercise you do during your week in your settings then the additional calories burned are already accounted for and therefore should not be eaten back.
On the other hand, if you use sedentary then anything you do over and above are bonus calories and can be eaten back even if not all of them.
Is this right?
MFP doesn't account for your workouts.
^^this - the MFP activity levels are for your non-workout lifestyle0 -
Well, I eat back most of mine, that I earn from doing a lot of cycling, and I go by the mfp calculations, having found it tallies with several other sites. I am maintaining, which is what I am meant to be doing, and that is eating 1800 without exercise, and anything up to 3000 with exercise. I don't see the point in drastically restricting yourself when this is meant to be a lifestyle change, not a diet. The weight is far more likely to go straight back on at a later date, unless you intend on spending the rest of your life at an extreme deficit, which doesn't seem much fun and will eventually wear you down. (I speak from personal experience)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions