heart rate moniters
denise4230
Posts: 82 Member
I'm looking to invest in a heart rate moniter so I can better track how many calories I burn during exercise, I'd like to stay around the $50 range, does anyone have any suggestions on which ones are the best?
0
Replies
-
Wal mart has some for around 300
-
I'm going to watch this one because I'm wondering the same thing.0
-
I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.0
-
the one I saw in the walmart only had a 3 star rating, so I was iffy about it. have checkout a bunch online, but was hoping to get some input from people who have actually used them.0
-
I got a Polar FT4 HRM on Amazon for about $65 and it is great! It shows you your heart rate and counts the calories burned (plus you input your stats so you know that it is accurate). I would definitely recommend it!0
-
look for a Polar ft4 on ebay if you can. or check amazon.com Polars are great and the F4 is a good but basic model for a starting out HRM
http://www.amazon.com/Polar-Heart-Rate-Monitor-Purple/dp/B005M1P85O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1338135719&sr=8-1
Ok a bit over 50 but you can watch ebay also or wait for sales0 -
I have two.
The first one my wife bought for me 1.5 years ago. About $30. To get a heart rate I have to hold my finger on the watch face. It's good for spot readings, NOT continuous heart rate monitoring. As I sweat more the watch thinks I am trying to get a reading which is not accurate or just no reading.
I bought a HRM with a chest strap so I could have a continuous reading.
I am watching my heart rate, not calories burned.
Here is some interesting reading.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21178923
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/the-real-facts-about-hrms-and-calories-what-you-need-to-know-before-purchasing-an-hrm-or-using-one-21472
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/UponThisRock/view/much-ado-about-heart-rate-2639940 -
Ive had a Rebox HRM for years now, more than 5, changed the batteries a couple of times,.. .. found it for around $40 on ebay...very durable, Im very hard on gear, I have used mine for Muay Thai ,where it was broken but i just super glued the strap back to the chest sensor.. works fine.. boxing, Insanity, cycling, syncs with treadmills, and other cardio machines.. easy to set up and has timer, chrono, two time zones,, cal burned, in zone , above zone.. perfect.. easy t o read display altough mine is not so scratched up now.. time for a new one..:happy:0
-
I just replaced my Polar HRM after about 14 years. I got another Polar - the FT4 for women (in dark pink). I love it! I didn't need a lot of bells and whistles, I just wanted one that measured my heart rate and my calories burned. I got it on Amazon for ~$70US. Polar also makes a Cardio SportsBra, where you snap in the transmitter and you no longer need to wear the chest strap. Prior to buying the Polar, I asked a company which one they recommended and here is the answer - very helpful!
[Quoted email]
Sorry for the delay on the question about the HR monitor!!
You are right, there are a bunch of brands out there that offer HR monitor products out there… and it can get confusing.
We currently offer 2 different brands…. And I will give you some info and you can decide which is best for you.
First one is Polar…. They are the best known brand out there… they have a good reputation for quality and some of their products can count calories…. Plus WAY more! Some of them can even download products to your computer for tracking… to the point where they have stopped calling them “heart rate monitors” and started calling them “training computers”. Each of them comes with one of the chest straps that sends the signal to your “watch” to give you the info. They range from $70 to $230, just depending on the options you want.
One thing I will say is that if you really want to get into it, and spend a bit more money… then explore the Polar website for more info… some of their chest straps can be taken off of the strap and then attached to a special sports bra that they have built. It would be a bit of an investment, but it is up to you…. I am just trying to give you some info so you can hopefully decide a bit easier.
We also just decided to offer a brand called Oregon Scientific. They are known for their high end electronic equipment, but are not as well known in the fitness industry as what a company like Polar is.
They offer some lesser priced products that offer good basic functions for a competitive price. We are carrying 2 different versions…. One is the typical version with the chest strap, and the other is the Strap-FREE version. The strap version is probably more accurate because it has the monitoring strap right by your heart. I will say the strap-free version is the best strap-free version we have tried… we were very impressed by how accurate it was because many of the strap-free versions on the market we have looked at we were less than satisfied with, and that is why we only offer one strap-free version to our customers because we know that our customers expect things to work well.
In MY opinion… if you are really looking for a product that can do many different things and give you those extra features, then I would lean toward Polar…. But if you are looking for something to get started with, that is a good quality that does the basic stuff like track calories, heart rate and can act as a stop watch and a normal watch… then I would probably go with the Oregon Scientific…. Probably the SE102 that has the strap because it is actually less price than the strap-free version. Also… if you run on a treadmill/elliptical that works with the HR monitors, then choose a strap version so that it is a constant monitor…. The strap-free version only checks it on demand.
[End of quoted email]0 -
amazon or ebay0
-
I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
For those who have a tendency to over-train or under-train, HRM are great tools, as they can keep you in your fitness improvement zone. Prior to obtaining my HRM that counts calories, I just used the entries from MFP. After using my HRM, I realized the calories burned on MFP were grossly over-stated on some items, and understated on others.
I think it's worth it and anyone who is serious about fitness will tell you the same.0 -
I also vote for the polar ft4! I paid a little more because I just had to have it right away and of course I wanted the purple/pink one but I absolutely love it!!
It has really helped me with motivation and pushing myself harder. I definitely recommend getting an hrm.0 -
bumping cause curiosity0
-
I have two.
The first one my wife bought for me 1.5 years ago. About $30. To get a heart rate I have to hold my finger on the watch face. It's good for spot readings, NOT continuous heart rate monitoring. As I sweat more the watch thinks I am trying to get a reading which is not accurate or just no reading.
I bought a HRM with a chest strap so I could have a continuous reading.
I am watching my heart rate, not calories burned.
Here is some interesting reading.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21178923
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/the-real-facts-about-hrms-and-calories-what-you-need-to-know-before-purchasing-an-hrm-or-using-one-21472
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/UponThisRock/view/much-ado-about-heart-rate-263994
_ok, thanks will check out those sites0 -
Bump because I am interested in heart rate monitors...0
-
I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
I disagree because when I bought mine, MFP was way off than what I was actually burning. MFP was throwing me off and the HRM got me back on track!! Totally worth it!!0 -
I have recently brought the Polar FT4 and it’s the best thing I have brought for my fitness. It asks for your age gender etc and has great features.
I was in the same position as you, not knowing whether they were worth the money. But as I get frustrated not knowing how many calories I’m burning while I’m working out it pushed me to get one.
I find that because I can see how many I’m burning I’m pushing myself for longer and if I see my heart rate drop it beeps at me and I jump around a bit to get in "the zone" again.
I would recommend it to anyone that is taking their fitness or weight loss seriously
0 -
I just got a Polar ft7 this week and I am loving it because it accurate in counting my calories burned compared to the machines or mfp. it is worth the investment.0
-
I've had several over the years. The best being a Sports Intruments that I paid $25 and it lasted about 3 years. I was heartbroken when it stopped working. My Polar FT7 recently stopped. Now I have an FT4. It was about $90 with the extra warranty. The calories on MFP are inaccurate. The HRM with the chest strap is pretty accurate because it's programmed for YOU. I had issues with the reliabilty of ones that you touch (even with the chest strap).0
-
seems like a lot of people like the polar FT7, so I went ahead and ordered it. will follow up with how I like it when it comes in. would still like to hear feedback on the subject though.0
-
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>0 -
bump0
-
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>
That's ok for you to think that. For the exercises I do, it seems to be so close that it's ridiculous. It's not ok for you to make this statement when I have been comparing for months.0 -
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>
That's ok for you to think that. For the exercises I do, it seems to be so close that it's ridiculous. It's not ok for you to make this statement when I have been comparing for months.
HAHA why you mad though?0 -
The main difference between the FT4 and FT& is that you can get a HRM reader that uploads your workout info to PolarPersonalTrainer.com. The Flow Link device costs extra. Did you look at the Polar website to compare items? Lots of great info there - good luck!0
-
I really like my Polar FT7. It was about 100 bucks though.. I have heard great things about teh FT4 as well.0
-
I shared this on another HRM thread but I'll add the info here in case it helps others. :flowerforyou:
http://www.bodytronics.com/c/polar_ft_series_heart_rate_monitors
This seems to be a good place to purchase them, free shipping and the lowest place I've found yet.
If there's really not much difference in the FT4 & FT7 I may go with the less costly. I know the FT4 holds 9 workouts (this is what I was told by Polar on the phone, unless someone has been told differently?) and the FT7 holds 99 and you can purchase extra equipment for $50 or so gear to download your workouts if you so desire for the FT7 only.
Here's the current price for each on the above site:
FT4 = SALE PRICE: $61.88
FT7 = SALE PRICE: $76.11
Often I see codes for discounts for Bodytronics, one may pop up on this page since we're discussing the company now.
I'll go with one of these and for some reason I still can't make a decision which one. Probably because they are so close in comparison it doesn't matter much and might be why I'm stuck trying to decide.
Hope the info above helps someone0 -
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>
That's ok for you to think that. For the exercises I do, it seems to be so close that it's ridiculous. It's not ok for you to make this statement when I have been comparing for months.
HAHA why you mad though?
ok, really guys, I'm looking for useful information, not petty comments. Everyone has their own opinion and that's ok, because I am looking for just that, peoples opinions on the subject.0 -
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>
That's ok for you to think that. For the exercises I do, it seems to be so close that it's ridiculous. It's not ok for you to make this statement when I have been comparing for months.
HAHA why you mad though?
Not mad, just correcting what you said.0 -
\I don't think they are worth the money. MFP is about as accurate.
YOUR STATEMENT IS <b>inaccurate</b>
That's ok for you to think that. For the exercises I do, it seems to be so close that it's ridiculous. It's not ok for you to make this statement when I have been comparing for months.
HAHA why you mad though?
ok, really guys, I'm looking for useful information, not petty comments. Everyone has their own opinion and that's ok, because I am looking for just that, peoples opinions on the subject.
And that's what I gave...my opinion. I think your money is better left in the bank because according to my calculations, MFP is close enough. It was a waste of money For me.
The exception to this will be, if I start running in the sand, I'll need an HRM, because MFP doesn't have "running in the sand". So it will be useful at that point. I may start doing that after my race next week. But, if there is a default cardio exercise in the database, it should be close enough.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions