Fitbit or MFP calories

I have recently got a Fitbit which I love but I'm unsure as to which is more accurate on calories burnt.

When I log exercise on MFP the calories seem quite high compared to the Fitbit, what do other users think?

Replies

  • lilmisfit
    lilmisfit Posts: 860 Member
    I start the timer on my Fitbit when I start my workout and stop it when I'm done. Then I upload the activity record and record that on MFP. Seems the most accurate way to do it.
  • stfuriada
    stfuriada Posts: 445 Member
    I feel MFP overestimates the calories burned.

    I'd personally go with the lower estimate just to be sure.
  • kettle_belle83
    kettle_belle83 Posts: 94 Member
    I've done both. I do think that the calories MFP lists are a bit high. I decided to go with a HRM instead of the Fitbit and I think it's the most accurate.
  • cmurray234
    cmurray234 Posts: 112 Member
    I always go with fitbit. In fact, I never use MFP calories as they are always high compared to the read-outs I get at the gym, etc...
  • bekkaL85
    bekkaL85 Posts: 133 Member
    I just use MFP for logging exercise. It syncs up with FitBit in a couple of minutes. Then any "extras" will appear on your exercise log as FitBit calorie adjustment. It seems to really work for me logging it that way.
  • bekkaL85
    bekkaL85 Posts: 133 Member
    I start the timer on my Fitbit when I start my workout and stop it when I'm done. Then I upload the activity record and record that on MFP. Seems the most accurate way to do it.

    this is really the best way to do it based on trying things out.