MFP or ScoobyDoo..

Options
AimersBee
AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
I mean.. scoobysworkshop :wink:


So... I'm at a limbo here... which way do I go... My first 2.5 weeks with the MFP calculator made me lose 5 lbs... now I've stayed stagnent for the last 3 weeks... these 2 are so much different, which one should I be going by?

MFP..
125.jpg



or...



Scoobysworkshop (http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/)
124.jpg


Thanks in advance for the advice! :flowerforyou:

Replies

  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,809 Member
    Why do you have your weight loss goal here set so aggressively?

    If you set your Goals here to reflect a 15%-20% deficit, like the other site did, you'd get better numbers. Don't use "2 lbs a week" just because you can.

    If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
    If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.

    If your BMR is 1500, don't eat below that!

    If you use MFP's numbers, they expect you to add back the calories burned from exercise. Scooby figures it in.


  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    Why do you have your weight loss goal here set so aggressively?

    If you set your Goals here to reflect a 15%-20% deficit, like the other site did, you'd get better numbers. Don't use "2 lbs a week" just because you can.

    If you have 75+ lbs to lose 2 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 40-75 lbs to lose 1.5 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 25-40 lbs to lose 1 lbs/week is ideal,
    If you have 15 -25 lbs to lose 0.5 to 1.0 lbs/week is ideal, and
    If you have less than 15 lbs to lose 0.5 lbs/week is ideal.

    If your BMR is 1500, don't eat below that!

    If you use MFP's numbers, they expect you to add back the calories burned from exercise. Scooby figures it in.



    I did only set it to 1 lb per week?

    126.jpg
    127.jpg
  • zukkiz
    zukkiz Posts: 362 Member
    I use Scooby and it works great for me.
  • ElizabethRoad
    ElizabethRoad Posts: 5,138 Member
    Why did you put in sedentary on MFP but not on Scooby?
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,809 Member
    Okay. so when you add in those workouts, you get another 400-600 calories per workout. According to your MFP input, you do 4-5 a week. That would put you at anywhere from 1700-1900 a day. Similar to what Scooby says at 1900ish...

    Scooby figured the calories based on you saying you exercise. MFP gives you a deficit and wants you to ENTER your exercise.

    They all use similar calulations. . . you just need to input differently.
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    Why did you put in sedentary on MFP but not on Scooby?

    Because MFP gives the option of putting exercise levels, and Scooby doesn't in the same way... (which I was confused with)
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    Okay. so when you add in those workouts, you get another 400-600 calories per workout. According to your MFP input, you do 4-5 a week. That would put you at anywhere from 1700-1900 a day. Similar to what Scooby says at 1900ish...

    Scooby figured the calories based on you saying you exercise. MFP gives you a deficit and wants you to ENTER your exercise.

    They all use similar calulations. . . you just need to input differently.

    "400-600 calories per workout"

    I normally only get about 250-300 calories per workout..?
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,809 Member
    Okay. so when you add in those workouts, you get another 400-600 calories per workout. According to your MFP input, you do 4-5 a week. That would put you at anywhere from 1700-1900 a day. Similar to what Scooby says at 1900ish...

    Scooby figured the calories based on you saying you exercise. MFP gives you a deficit and wants you to ENTER your exercise.

    They all use similar calulations. . . you just need to input differently.

    "400-600 calories per workout"

    I normally only get about 250-300 calories per workout..?

    Just pick one of the systems and work it for a month. If it doesn't work, change it.
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    As MFP states, I get 690 calories burned every week with my workout.. so 690 / 7 days a week = 98.57

    So wouldn't it be 1290 calories + 98.57.. therefore only taking me to 1388.57

    Bare with me.. I'm only new with this... :ohwell:
  • ElizabethRoad
    ElizabethRoad Posts: 5,138 Member
    Why did you put in sedentary on MFP but not on Scooby?
    Because MFP gives the option of putting exercise levels, and Scooby doesn't in the same way... (which I was confused with)
    Understood, but why would you expect it to give you the same number when you're giving it different information?
  • HeidiMightyRawr
    HeidiMightyRawr Posts: 3,343 Member
    In MFP you have put yourself as sedentary. This means those workouts you're doing, it's advised you eat the calories back.

    With scooby's workshop you have put 3-5hrs of moderate exercise a week (hence why you have more calories) If you put "none" in this section, you would find you have less calories - closer to what MFP gives.
  • ElizabethRoad
    ElizabethRoad Posts: 5,138 Member
    Okay. so when you add in those workouts, you get another 400-600 calories per workout. According to your MFP input, you do 4-5 a week. That would put you at anywhere from 1700-1900 a day. Similar to what Scooby says at 1900ish...

    Scooby figured the calories based on you saying you exercise. MFP gives you a deficit and wants you to ENTER your exercise.

    They all use similar calulations. . . you just need to input differently.

    "400-600 calories per workout"

    I normally only get about 250-300 calories per workout..?
    If you change your settings on Scooby to sedentary, it gives you 1536 calories. That means it's giving you credit for an additional 448 calories a day just for working out.
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    Why did you put in sedentary on MFP but not on Scooby?
    Because MFP gives the option of putting exercise levels, and Scooby doesn't in the same way... (which I was confused with)
    Understood, but why would you expect it to give you the same number when you're giving it different information?

    I'm not.. I've posted exercise on both programs the exact same.. they both ask it differently though.. one has 2 questions.. (which I do work a desk job).. but then I put the exercise in on the following question.. the next one asks it in one question.. which I put my exercise in..?
  • ElizabethRoad
    ElizabethRoad Posts: 5,138 Member
    Why did you put in sedentary on MFP but not on Scooby?
    Because MFP gives the option of putting exercise levels, and Scooby doesn't in the same way... (which I was confused with)
    Understood, but why would you expect it to give you the same number when you're giving it different information?

    I'm not.. I've posted exercise on both programs the exact same.. they both ask it differently though.. one has 2 questions.. (which I do work a desk job).. but then I put the exercise in on the following question.. the next one asks it in one question.. which I put my exercise in..?
    No, MFP does not give you extra calories until you log the exercise. It doesn't matter how much you say you intend to do.
  • wild_wild_life
    wild_wild_life Posts: 1,334 Member
    MFP has you at a 500 cal daily deficit based on your desire to lose 1 lb per week. Scooby has you at a 350 cal daily deficit based on TDEE - 15%.

    Choose whichever deficit you prefer, you should lose weight either way.

    I am also a 5'4" female and think MFP underestimated my maintenance needs, fwiw. I am maintaining around 1900 cal/day.
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    128.jpg

    Scooby with no exercise input into it..
  • Oishii
    Oishii Posts: 2,675 Member
    The only real answer is to experiment with everything! I just got a fitbit and I'm waiting to see IF its numbers are right for me, rather than assuming they are. None of the calculators have given me numbers that match my experience yet!

    Pick a number, see if it works, if it doesn't, pick a different number.
  • AimersBee
    AimersBee Posts: 775 Member
    The only real answer is to experiment with everything! I just got a fitbit and I'm waiting to see IF its numbers are right for me, rather than assuming they are. None of the calculators have given me numbers that match my experience yet!

    Pick a number, see if it works, if it doesn't, pick a different number.

    Thanks for the advice :)
This discussion has been closed.