We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Calories burned MFP vs heart rate based

onikonor
Posts: 473 Member
I don't have a HRM (I did order one just waiting for it in the mail) and decided to take my heart rate manually during a workout. I did circuit training for about 40 minutes and took heart rate during peak (manually) which was about 180 bpm (does this number make sense?). When I keyed it into the calorie calculator it gave me net calories burned of 460 while mfp gives 390.
My first question is how can people get into 700+ calories burned range? I worked really hard and got only to 400+.
Out of curiosity, which one do you think is more accruate? Which one should I enter?
My first question is how can people get into 700+ calories burned range? I worked really hard and got only to 400+.
Out of curiosity, which one do you think is more accruate? Which one should I enter?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.5K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.1K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.3K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.8K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions