Ketosis...good or bad??

I have a very, very high protein/low carb diet and am regularly in `ketosis`

I love protein ;-)

Every so often I have a high carb low protein day (maybe once every week to 10 days) as it helps to move the weight along a little.

I just wondered what peoples opinions are of ketosis as there are so many conflicting reviews on the Google for instance.

What do you think???
«1

Replies

  • VMarkV
    VMarkV Posts: 522 Member
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity
  • MrsBully4
    MrsBully4 Posts: 304 Member
    I was constantly exhausted when I did this. It felt horrible.
  • Saiklor
    Saiklor Posts: 183
    I think the being tired and feeling awful really depends on the person. My friend does this (he's on the Keto diet) and he has enough energy to do dragon-boating which is basically high intensity-short bursts. And he feels sore afterwards, but otherwise fine.
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity

    So I am always in a deficit, my main exercise is walking and I have just incorporated weights in the last 8 weeks.

    Typical example for today for instance is carbs 24 protein 116 fat 66
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    I was constantly exhausted when I did this. It felt horrible.

    Haven`t noticed being exhausted...I live a pretty busy life style with work and stuff, but that is not to say it didn`t happen to you ;-)
  • sobriquet84
    sobriquet84 Posts: 607 Member
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity

    yup.

    only okay if you're sedentary. and if you're not (if you're active/if you work out), i HIGHLY recommend carbing more than once every 7- 10 days, to keep you OUT of ketosis. when I'm tryin to cut weight, I carb cycle every 3rd or 4th day. and even on my "low-carb" days, my net carbs are still between 30 and 60g.
  • ladiaz23
    ladiaz23 Posts: 1
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity

    yup.

    only okay if you're sedentary. and if you're not (if you're active/if you work out), i HIGHLY recommend carbing more than once every 7- 10 days, to keep you OUT of ketosis. when I'm tryin to cut weight, I carb cycle every 3rd or 4th day. and even on my "low-carb" days, my net carbs are still between 30 and 60g.

    Why do you think it is bad though? Which is the impression I get from your reply?
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.

    NO ketosis causes your body to burn fat for energy not lean muscle. Diabetics (of which I am not one) are a whole different can of worms
  • sobriquet84
    sobriquet84 Posts: 607 Member
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity

    yup.

    only okay if you're sedentary. and if you're not (if you're active/if you work out), i HIGHLY recommend carbing more than once every 7- 10 days, to keep you OUT of ketosis. when I'm tryin to cut weight, I carb cycle every 3rd or 4th day. and even on my "low-carb" days, my net carbs are still between 30 and 60g.

    Why do you think it is bad though? Which is the impression I get from your reply?

    it is very important to replenish glycogen after totally depleting it from your muscles. although protein is the building material for muscle, without any glycogen, protein becomes the source for fuel (catabolism). high levels of cortisol is associated with catabolism which obstructs the rebuilding of muscle protein by diverting its amino acid building blocks to the liver. because protein is an important structural element of muscles, catabolism leaves the muscles in a weakened state afterward. so, you're unable to build/strengthen, and rather, you break your muscles down.

    protein and fat do get converted to glucose, just at a slower rate than carbs. when you're glycogen level is zero and you're demanding a lot of your muscles, to avoid catabolism, you need a carbohydrate refeed. and if you're regularly demanding a significant amount of energy from your muscles, then by staying in ketosis, you're doing nothing but harm and increasing your chances of not being able to keep the weight off (and probably gain more back) once you come out of ketosis.
  • RayRay1500
    RayRay1500 Posts: 158 Member
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.

    NO ketosis causes your body to burn fat for energy not lean muscle. Diabetics (of which I am not one) are a whole different can of worms


    This is correct. If carbs are there they are burned, not fat. That is the whole point of ketosis, eliminate the carbs and burn fat. I feel wonderful in ketosis and I work out.
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    Sobriquet84...so how long do you think it is `safe` to follow a ketosis state?

    Have you tried it or are you just going from what you have read or heard??

    I am really interested to know from practical experience also :-)))
  • AlabasterVerve
    AlabasterVerve Posts: 3,171 Member
    I haven't made up my mind about ketosis or not yet. I just decided to try and keep my carbs under 100 this week and for right now that's good enough for me. While I was reading around though I came across this blog which might be interesting for those who exercise intensely.

    The interplay of exercise and ketosis – Part I
    http://eatingacademy.com/nutrition/the-interplay-of-exercise-and-ketosis-part-i
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.

    NO ketosis causes your body to burn fat for energy not lean muscle. Diabetics (of which I am not one) are a whole different can of worms




    This is correct. If carbs are there they are burned, not fat. That is the whole point of ketosis, eliminate the carbs and burn fat. I feel wonderful in ketosis and I work out.
    [/quote

    Thank you RayRay1500 for your opinion. I am glad it is working for you!!!!
  • mermx
    mermx Posts: 976
    I haven't made up my mind about ketosis or not yet. I just decided to try and keep my carbs under 100 this week and for right now that's good enough for me. While I was reading around though I came across this blog which might be interesting for those who exercise intensely.

    The interplay of exercise and ketosis – Part I
    http://eatingacademy.com/nutrition/the-interplay-of-exercise-and-ketosis-part-i

    Thanks I will take a look at the blog tomorrow.

    There is so much `stuff` on the internet and I am still hopeful that people from MFP will have some personal experiences too ;-)
  • sobriquet84
    sobriquet84 Posts: 607 Member
    Sobriquet84...so how long do you think it is `safe` to follow a ketosis state?

    Have you tried it or are you just going from what you have read or heard??

    I am really interested to know from practical experience also :-)))

    yes, i've tried it.

    it was a part of an eating disorder i had several years ago that lasted a couple years. i lost a lot of weight, and actually landed in the hospital due to severe kidney infections, and that's when i knew something had to change. i gained weight back FAST, even with small adjustments, and then some, and it took a solid 5 years for my metabolism and my body to recover. i was eating about 1,000 calories a day, at about 15g net carbs a day.

    through those 2 years that i was depriving and destroying myself, i studied everything i could about the science behind and different theories on how to get my body fat percentage as low as i could. i learned how to lose fat and KEEP it off after experiencing the devistating effects of what i did to myself.
  • 1000 calories a day and 15 net carbs per day is really, really extreme. I've been doing keto at 50 net carbs per day and 1500-2000 calories a day, that's pretty standard for a keto diet although some do 20 to get inducted, most people can have 50-100 and stay in ketosis. The goal is to be in ketosis, so if you can eat more, you should. I eat tons of veggies and some fruit (plus protein and fat obviously) and continue to lose and feel healthy.
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,256 Member
    If your consuming very high amounts of protein, then your probably not in ketosis.........moderate protein and high fat translates into ketosis.
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    I think it's reasonably difficult to stay in ketosis to the level described as "nutritional ketosis" where the ketone supply to the brain is at a maximum. Ketosis of either starvation or carb restriction is a state that shows the body is using it's large fuel tank of fats as the small carb one is running low and isn't being filled by food with carbs.

    Don't think there's any harmful side effects, specialist ketogenic diets are used to treat epilepsy but they are a lot lower protein than you describe.
  • MityMax96
    MityMax96 Posts: 5,778 Member
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.

    :huh: :huh: :huh: :huh: :huh: :noway: :noway: :noway:
  • DaddieCat
    DaddieCat Posts: 3,643 Member
    I'm doing cyclical keto, so... keto sunday through friday, carb up on saturday, rinse, repeat.

    After the initial adjustment period I was fine... during that period I was lethargic and spacey.

    I still lift three to 5 days, active rest days, and one full rest day per week.

    The first thing you will lose is some water weight... it will then settle and begin to burn fat. I no longer find myself lethargic, I see progression, not always in weight due to lifting, but in body fat percentage drops. I'm happy, energetic and fine. I do get a little more sore than I used to, but I drink plenty of water and it sorts itself out before next gym day.


    Feel free to add if you want to talk about it... otherwise, have fun, work hard and accomplish your goals.

    **Edited to fix spelling errors
  • parkscs
    parkscs Posts: 1,639 Member
    Ketosis causes you to burn lean muscle tissue for fuel. You only burn fat when there is carbohydrate present. DO NOT cut your carbs out! Even diabetics should have about 50% of their diet from Carbs. They are your main energy source. Protein, if eaten in large amounts, can cause gall stones, kidney stones and other ailments. Carbs=energy and fat burning...Protein=stabilized blood sugar and repair...Fat=fuller longer and decreased LDL production. The % of each depends on the amount of exercise you do and your goals.

    Where to begin...
    it is very important to replenish glycogen after totally depleting it from your muscles. although protein is the building material for muscle, without any glycogen, protein becomes the source for fuel (catabolism). high levels of cortisol is associated with catabolism which obstructs the rebuilding of muscle protein by diverting its amino acid building blocks to the liver. because protein is an important structural element of muscles, catabolism leaves the muscles in a weakened state afterward. so, you're unable to build/strengthen, and rather, you break your muscles down.

    I really don't think you understand low carb diets as well as you let on. The notion that your body will burn protein for fuel on a low carb diet rather than fat, leading to your body catabolizing your muscles, is simply incorrect. A low carb diet can be as muscle sparing as a standard IIFYM diet, provided you're hitting your protein macro and doing resistance training. Your body will not break down your muscles simply because your muscle glycogen stores are depleted. Some people may find they feel lethargic when this happens but that is not the same as catabolism. I know many people that continue lifting while eating a low carb diet and find it to be a good option for sparing lean body mass.
    protein and fat do get converted to glucose, just at a slower rate than carbs. when you're glycogen level is zero and you're demanding a lot of your muscles, to avoid catabolism, you need a carbohydrate refeed. and if you're regularly demanding a significant amount of energy from your muscles, then by staying in ketosis, you're doing nothing but harm and increasing your chances of not being able to keep the weight off (and probably gain more back) once you come out of ketosis.

    Fat gets converted into glucose? Really? You may want to double check that one. As for protein, while it's possible for your body to convert protein into glucose, it's not a particular efficient process and whether this happens as a practical matter is another story. But again, your suggestion that you will lose muscle simply because you're on a low carb diet is absolutely wrong.

    I'm not going to say a low carb diet is right for everyone. It's not. But please, let's not sit here and spread misinformation like "you'll lose all your muscle if you eat low carb!"
  • 195to135
    195to135 Posts: 33 Member
    Good if you are in a caloric deficit and want to lose weight/fat without exercising and have low daily activity
    Bad if you exercise and have an active lifestlye
    By ketosis, I am thinking around 30g or less carbohydrates per day, ketones in the urine, glycogen stores are depleted...it's just not enough to provide someone with readily usable energy for activity

    yup.

    only okay if you're sedentary. and if you're not (if you're active/if you work out), i HIGHLY recommend carbing more than once every 7- 10 days, to keep you OUT of ketosis. when I'm tryin to cut weight, I carb cycle every 3rd or 4th day. and even on my "low-carb" days, my net carbs are still between 30 and 60g.

    :huh:
    Only okay if you're sedentary?
    Where in the world did you come up with that?

    Wish I had of got that memo when I started Keto I could have been laying around instead of hitting the gym at 6am five times a week :sad:
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    Fat gets converted into glucose? Really? You may want to double check that one. As for protein, while it's possible for your body to convert protein into glucose, it's not a particular efficient process and whether this happens as a practical matter is another story.

    an interesting story too - http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/90/3/519.long looked specifically at this - gluconeogenesis in a high protein, high fat very low carb diet with a control and crossover of a 55% carb 12% protein "standard" diet.
    EGP was lower in the H condition than in the N condition (181 ± 9 compared with 226 ± 9 g/d; P < 0.001), whereas fractional gluconeogenesis was higher (0.95 ± 0.04 compared with 0.64 ± 0.03; P < 0.001) and absolute gluconeogenesis tended to be higher (171 ± 10 compared with 145 ± 10 g/d; P = 0.06) in the H condition than in the N condition. EE (resting metabolic rate) was greater in the H condition than in the N condition (8.46 ± 0.23 compared with 8.12 ± 0.31 MJ/d; P < 0.05).

    EGP = Endogenous glucose production, H = high protein / fat diet, N = "normal" lower protein diet.

    Endogenous glucose production, ie, glucose derived from glycogenolysis and from gluconeogenesis, was lower on the high protein / high fat diet by 45 g/day.

    Energy measurements confirmed the inefficiency of the process but an extra 26 g/day on average of glucose production by gluconeogenesis was measured, offsetting the large reduction in glycogenolysis.

    Glycerol and fatty acids from adipose tissue are a substrate for gluconeogenesis, so do get converted to glucose -

    Gluconeogenesis.png
  • 3laine75
    3laine75 Posts: 3,069 Member
    Great for weight loss (muscle and fat) but IMO not sustainable and no good at all if you're trying to improve LBM.
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,256 Member
    Fat gets converted into glucose? Really? You may want to double check that one. As for protein, while it's possible for your body to convert protein into glucose, it's not a particular efficient process and whether this happens as a practical matter is another story.

    an interesting story too - http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/90/3/519.long looked specifically at this - gluconeogenesis in a high protein, high fat very low carb diet with a control and crossover of a 55% carb 12% protein "standard" diet.
    EGP was lower in the H condition than in the N condition (181 ± 9 compared with 226 ± 9 g/d; P < 0.001), whereas fractional gluconeogenesis was higher (0.95 ± 0.04 compared with 0.64 ± 0.03; P < 0.001) and absolute gluconeogenesis tended to be higher (171 ± 10 compared with 145 ± 10 g/d; P = 0.06) in the H condition than in the N condition. EE (resting metabolic rate) was greater in the H condition than in the N condition (8.46 ± 0.23 compared with 8.12 ± 0.31 MJ/d; P < 0.05).

    EGP = Endogenous glucose production, H = high protein / fat diet, N = "normal" lower protein diet.

    Endogenous glucose production, ie, glucose derived from glycogenolysis and from gluconeogenesis, was lower on the high protein / high fat diet by 45 g/day.

    Energy measurements confirmed the inefficiency of the process but an extra 26 g/day on average of glucose production by gluconeogenesis was measured, offsetting the large reduction in glycogenolysis.

    Glycerol and fatty acids from adipose tissue are a substrate for gluconeogenesis, so do get converted to glucose -

    Gluconeogenesis.png
    The energy required for that conversion is very high, pretty much making the conversion inconsequential, I believe.....lol. Or at least I couldn't find any source that showed anything different, but it's been a few years since I've looked. Basically, i think you'll find that while it does happen, it's miniscule for purposes of usable energy.
  • kennie2
    kennie2 Posts: 1,170 Member
    yuck
  • tattygun
    tattygun Posts: 447 Member
    I did it for about 8 months. It was ok, it got me lean but I wasn't as strong, I missed carbs and eating out or at friends etc can become problematic. Now back eating carbs (and plenty of em) and I'm much happier and stronger. To each their own though!
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    The energy required for that conversion is very high, pretty much making the conversion inconsequential, I believe.....lol. Or at least I couldn't find any source that showed anything different, but it's been a few years since I've looked. Basically, i think you'll find that while it does happen, it's miniscule for purposes of usable energy.

    The paper quoted the extent of it and how much extra energy it used.

    It is only necessary for production of glucose of course, and our demand for that isn't massive. The extra 26 g/day of glucose is only 100 calories so it is indeed not going to set the world alight.

    The overall balance is interesting in http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/90/3/519/T4.expansion.html on the high protein / high fat diet protein was accumulating whereas in the SAD type diet protein was being depleted - the opposite of much conventional wisdom around low carb diets causing protein / muscle loss.
  • neanderthin
    neanderthin Posts: 10,256 Member
    The energy required for that conversion is very high, pretty much making the conversion inconsequential, I believe.....lol. Or at least I couldn't find any source that showed anything different, but it's been a few years since I've looked. Basically, i think you'll find that while it does happen, it's miniscule for purposes of usable energy.

    The paper quoted the extent of it and how much extra energy it used.

    It is only necessary for production of glucose of course, and our demand for that isn't massive. The extra 26 g/day of glucose is only 100 calories so it is indeed not going to set the world alight.

    The overall balance is interesting in http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/90/3/519/T4.expansion.html on the high protein / high fat diet protein was accumulating whereas in the SAD type diet protein was being depleted - the opposite of much conventional wisdom around low carb diets causing protein / muscle loss.
    Like the previous study shows that when carbs are reduced the Acetyl CoA pathway is in full swing for conversion, so I'm not sure if it's just more efficient overall, and on the other hand other factors that inhibit conversion like methylglyoxal are higher. Anyway, it's interesting to know that for people that do ketogenic diets that the fat is also supplying some glucose for cell respiration and brain function.