Does it make a difference how long you exercise for?

c_827
c_827 Posts: 3
edited September 20 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm curious as to whether the things I have heard about needing to exercise for at least 30 minutes at a time for it to be effective, are true. I would much prefer to do 10 minutes here and there throughout the day, adding up to 30 minutes or more, but is that not as effective as doing 30 minutes at once? I'd like to know what everyone else thinks about this.

Thanks :)

Replies

  • CaGinger
    CaGinger Posts: 180 Member
    I would love to know as well! :flowerforyou: I think they mean mantaining a heart rate over a set amount for 30 minutes a day.. dont know if thats all together or not...
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    Well, yes and no. Basically, it's fine to do 10 to 15 minutes at a time, 3 or more times in a day, if you can do that. You really don't want to do less than 10 minutes for most cardio though, as it's hard to properly get your heart rate up to where you want it to be in less than 10 minutes.

    There have been numerous studies that have shown empirically that you can exercise all at once, or break it up throughout the day with very similar results. The key is to get at least 30 minutes of moderate cardiovascular activity in per day for 5 days a week, whether that's 3 10 minute sessions, or 1 30 minute session doesn't really matter.
  • CaGinger
    CaGinger Posts: 180 Member
    Thanks! :flowerforyou:
  • thanks! that was exactly what i was hoping :)
  • lsjd2000
    lsjd2000 Posts: 287 Member
    When you are trying to lose weight you should try to do over 20mins - the first 20mins is burning up the free floating glucose (blood sugar) after that you are burning fat. Good luck
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    When you are trying to lose weight you should try to do over 20mins - the first 20mins is burning up the free floating glucose (blood sugar) after that you are burning fat. Good luck


    takes far longer than 20 minutes. And that's not really the whole story, you never burn up all the glucose in the blood, nor would you want to, blood sugar does not equal fat, and it is what powers our muscles (along with every thing else), in fact, when we use body fat it's first converted to blood sugar for transport.

    EDIT:

    I think I know the thought behind this. There's a lot of rumor and innuendo out there with regard to when we start to actually "burn fat". Truth is, the body isn't that simple. You're body is always trying to burn fat stores, and always trying to store more fat as well, these biological processes almost never really "shut down", they do however slow down in certain conditions, the liver gives you glucose (blood sugar) to use as energy, that's transported by the blood stream. The longer we work out, the more DEMAND for energy there is, at a certain point the liver no longer has adequate supplies of energy required for work, so other mechanisms are enabled, like burning extra fat, this is done IN CONCERT with carbohydrate conversion, not in stead of. There are cases where this doesn't happen, like when a person becomes ketogenic (very low, or no carbs), where they convert amino acids and fatty acids (protein and fat) into energy, but this comes with it's own set of rules and should be only undertaken once you are well aware of them and willing to give up quite a bit in the way of food types.
This discussion has been closed.