vo2 max test questions
![PlunderBunneh](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/9501/5688/7e17/86fb/a475/2db6/6d60/375404cfa6fa716813dc9356472f02e44540.jpg)
PlunderBunneh
Posts: 1,705 Member
Short Version - Why did I get a higher burn when I entered in a new, higher VO2 max on my hrm?
Long Version - I have a Polar RS300X. When I purchased it back in April, I did the vo2 max test, with a result of 35. Since it's been a bit, I decided to retest this morning, and got the result of 55. I entered that into the user information as well as noting my current weight (177 vs 185 previously).
I was expecting a lower burn. That's how I had understood things, the healthier you get, the harder you have to work. As sort of a test, I kept my HRM on for an hour while wandering aimlessly on the internet this morning. Normally, an hour of mostly inactive would have resulted in a burn of around 150, and it was 100 today, so I thought, okay, hunkiedorey.
And then I hit the gym. I did my usual run of two miles, with my average speed, my bike of five miles, and my 40 minutes of weight lifting. Typically, for that I can expect 700 to 900 calories for 100 minutes. Today, it told me I had burned 1180. I'm confused. I was expecting a lower number. I didn't push any harder, if anything, my heart rate was lower during the bike and lifting than it normally is.
Can someone please explain this to me? I feel like I'm cheating, to enter in that number.
Long Version - I have a Polar RS300X. When I purchased it back in April, I did the vo2 max test, with a result of 35. Since it's been a bit, I decided to retest this morning, and got the result of 55. I entered that into the user information as well as noting my current weight (177 vs 185 previously).
I was expecting a lower burn. That's how I had understood things, the healthier you get, the harder you have to work. As sort of a test, I kept my HRM on for an hour while wandering aimlessly on the internet this morning. Normally, an hour of mostly inactive would have resulted in a burn of around 150, and it was 100 today, so I thought, okay, hunkiedorey.
And then I hit the gym. I did my usual run of two miles, with my average speed, my bike of five miles, and my 40 minutes of weight lifting. Typically, for that I can expect 700 to 900 calories for 100 minutes. Today, it told me I had burned 1180. I'm confused. I was expecting a lower number. I didn't push any harder, if anything, my heart rate was lower during the bike and lifting than it normally is.
Can someone please explain this to me? I feel like I'm cheating, to enter in that number.
0
Replies
-
Anybody?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 440 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions