Viewing the message boards in:

Interview with Alan Aragon

Posts: 11,068 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
This is straight-up awesomeness, as usual given the source.

http://workout911.com/?p=4029

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
«1

Replies

  • Posts: 28,072 Member
    Tagging to check out later.
  • Posts: 9,377 Member
    Thanks, SS!
  • Posts: 21,219 Member
    Will check out later for sure!
  • Posts: 1,296 Member
    Great interview. Alan has a gift with writing. Love his thoughts on IF, post exercise protein intake, and optimal macronutrient ratios with respect to weight loss...
  • Posts: 907 Member
    Bump -

    I bet you'll get more view if you opened with the "Sugar - They make you fat....and eat your babies too"
  • Posts: 11,068 Member
    Bump -

    I bet you'll get more view if you opened with the "Sugar - They make you fat....and eat your babies too"

    ^ It worked on my "Corn used my manparts for a speedbag" thread. LOL
  • Posts: 8,934 Member
    Bump
  • Posts: 2,720 Member
    Alan is indeed the Yoda of Nutrition. Before anyone begins to implement any kind of strategy, Alan is one of the few people they should look to for relevant, research-backed insight as to how a proper understanding of nutrition can aid in reaching one's goals.
  • Posts: 1,594 Member
    Great read! Thanks for the post.
  • Posts: 170 Member
    Thank you for posting. It was very interesting!
  • Posts: 296 Member
    I subscribe to his newsletter. He really is the man on demystifying nutrition research. :drinker:
  • Posts: 9,377 Member

    ^ It worked on my "Corn used my manparts for a speedbag" thread. LOL

    TRUE! :bigsmile:
  • Posts: 18,343 Member
    Great link, thanks. Alan is one of the few "gurus" I pay any attention to - facts, not broscience.
  • Posts: 1,156 Member
    bump
  • Posts: 432 Member
    Thanks for posting!!
  • Posts: 750 Member
    Bump read later...
  • Posts: 674 Member
    Bump for later. Thanks SS
  • Posts: 523 Member
    Thanks. I'll have a look later
  • Posts: 523 Member
    Thanks. I'll have a look later
  • Posts: 8,218 Member
    Thanks for the info SS :happy:
  • Posts: 1,903 Member
    Good stuff, Aragon is the man.
  • Posts: 120 Member
    I love Alan Aragon! Great article!
  • Posts: 11,068 Member
    bumpity.
  • Posts: 91 Member
    Well I think it's a great interview because I eat low carb which he says makes sense and I just naturally fell into IF as a result of eating low carb which he talks about too. No clue who he is and why I'd want to take advice from him but what he's saying in this interview is what I'm doing and having great success with so he's alright in my book! Thanks for sharing.
  • Posts: 2,071 Member
    Re: Interview- Very helpful to read this:
    How important is macronutrient ratio with respect to weight loss?

    People have varying total energy demands, and this can differently influence their macronutrient requirements. Ratios per se shouldn’t be the focus since they’re merely a default result of figuring absolute needs. For example, those with a moderate to high energy output (through formal training, non-exercise activity, or both), can typically consume a higher amount of carbohydrate and still lose weight. In contrast, sedentary or barely active folks have lower overall energy demands, thus a high carbohydrate intake wouldn’t likely be optimal.

    AND this:
    Are you a proponent of cutting carbs for someone who wants to get really lean?

    For losing fat past the initial stages, I’m a proponent of imposing a calorie deficit, and depending on the individual situation, this can involve a decrease in caloric intake, an increase in caloric output, or a combination of both. In the case of intake reduction, it doesn’t make sense to hack into critical nutrients – especially protein, whose requirement actually increases in a caloric deficit. So, for the most part, it’s carbs that will get the brunt of the reduction when it’s time to cut calories, while protein & fat remain somewhat stable (I typically set protein slightly higher than it needs to be). The degree of carb reduction varies individually, but the underlying aim is to consume the highest amount of carbs that still allow a satisfactory rate of fat loss. This approach accomplishes two main things – it enables the highest possible training performance (in terms of both strength & endurance), and also the lowest chance of undue hormonal downregulation from prolonged bouts of dieting. Carb reduction can then be strategically positioned as a trump card. In other words, carbs can always be incrementally reduced on an as-needed basis, depending on how results are proceeding.
  • Good stuff
  • Posts: 51 Member
    Bumpin' for later
  • Posts: 1,296 Member
    payowww
  • Posts: 9,377 Member
    I bookmarked it so I could go back and read a couple more times. I'd been curious about macros. Different people have different answers for what the right amounts are for weight loss, and apparently that's the right answer!
  • Bump...Thanks!!

    I book marked it for future reference
This discussion has been closed.