calorie burn...
perdie7
Posts: 266 Member
I use endomondo to track my running, and walking..both endomondo and MFP have my stats (weight height etc)
46 min running....endomondo... 668 calories burned MFP 473 calories burned difference of 195
27 min walking endomondo 170 calories burned MFP 117 difference of 53
total difference 248 calories....
that a big difference, and I've heard people say MFP calories burned is high....I can't afford to buy a heart monitor right now, just wishing I knew which was more accurate.
46 min running....endomondo... 668 calories burned MFP 473 calories burned difference of 195
27 min walking endomondo 170 calories burned MFP 117 difference of 53
total difference 248 calories....
that a big difference, and I've heard people say MFP calories burned is high....I can't afford to buy a heart monitor right now, just wishing I knew which was more accurate.
0
Replies
-
No idea, but before my HRM, I would always err on the side on conservatism and choose the lower of the two.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 437 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions