Medical testing on animals ....better them than me.....

Charlie003
Charlie003 Posts: 1,333 Member
It is a sad necessity. But rather them than me. Do not want my eyeballs melting from washing my hair.
«1

Replies

  • escloflowneCHANGED
    escloflowneCHANGED Posts: 3,038 Member
    I disagree! Screw humans!
  • jonward85
    jonward85 Posts: 534 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?
  • HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ... You must really want a lot of people to send you MFP hate mail!!!!! Not getting anywhere near this one!!!!!
  • Arexxx
    Arexxx Posts: 486 Member
    I'd rather we test on convicted felons..
  • escloflowneCHANGED
    escloflowneCHANGED Posts: 3,038 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    I like this one!
  • Litlbeast
    Litlbeast Posts: 340 Member
    .....Charlie. *facepalm* Holy crap *bites tongue to stop laughing*
  • auroranflash
    auroranflash Posts: 3,569 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    Finally a use for all of the child predators and those who abuse animals. :heart:
  • GamerGurl729
    GamerGurl729 Posts: 286 Member
    I disagree! Screw humans!

    This! I know a few choice humans who deserve to have their eyeballs melted. I say we do selective human testing. :bigsmile:
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    It is a sad necessity. But rather them than me. Do not want my eyeballs melting from washing my hair.

    That isn't medical testing.
  • Going4Lean
    Going4Lean Posts: 1,078 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    only on the worst of criminals.
  • Kimjanebrooks
    Kimjanebrooks Posts: 253 Member
    I disagree! Screw humans!

    Well said!
  • Kimjanebrooks
    Kimjanebrooks Posts: 253 Member
    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ... You must really want a lot of people to send you MFP hate mail!!!!! Not getting anywhere near this one!!!!!

    Couldn't agree more :explode:
  • maab_connor
    maab_connor Posts: 3,927 Member
    I disagree! Screw humans!

    OMG you are SICK! he was talking about medical testing, not bestiality. for shame!
  • Captain_Tightpants
    Captain_Tightpants Posts: 2,215 Member
    Convicts. Nuff said.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    :drinker:
    It is a sad necessity. But rather them than me. Do not want my eyeballs melting from washing my hair.

    Then again, maybe we've found a use for child molesters?
  • luvJOJO
    luvJOJO Posts: 1,881 Member
    runs for cover.......

    2m2wg49.gif
  • Charlie003
    Charlie003 Posts: 1,333 Member
    runs for cover.......

    2m2wg49.gif

    Too.....funny.....
  • morningmud
    morningmud Posts: 477 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    Finally a use for all of the child predators and those who abuse animals. :heart:

    ^ That!
  • Miss_dannii
    Miss_dannii Posts: 1,351 Member
    Child abusers.
  • firstsip
    firstsip Posts: 8,399 Member
    I agree with the other comments, we should be child abusers and use children as our tests--they're hardly people until 18, anyway.

    Oh wait, did I misread the comments above?
  • Yeah... The original poster was obviously joking to annoy stupid internet people. The people who then posted saying criminals should be tested on, kinda ironically more f****d than the original comment there. Sad commentary on the human condition, knowing that all of you people up there exist :(.
  • SoDamnHungry
    SoDamnHungry Posts: 6,998 Member
    The testing you're referring to is cosmetic testing, not medical. ;)
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    runs for cover.......

    2m2wg49.gif

    I have a cat who looks like that one. Poor thing! Although, she pooped on my bedroom floor last night and I stepped in it on the way to the bathroom this morning, so she isn't my favorite at the moment ...
  • pixtotts
    pixtotts Posts: 552 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    its better than the death penalty
    "very sorry we wrongfully convicted you at least your only blind not dead!"
    as a country without the death penalty i like this idea... i think the death penalty is wrong i think life imprisonment is too soft... lets safe the cute ickle bunnies and test on them instead...

    x
  • erinfog
    erinfog Posts: 95 Member
    *gets popcorn*
  • jonward85
    jonward85 Posts: 534 Member
    I'll say it...maybe we should do it on prison inmates? Keep the system down?

    its better than the death penalty
    "very sorry we wrongfully convicted you at least your only blind not dead!"
    as a country without the death penalty i like this idea... i think the death penalty is wrong i think life imprisonment is too soft... lets safe the cute ickle bunnies and test on them instead...

    x


    Finally someone gets me :). HAHA...i'm not saying we test on your normal criminals...just those that aren't going anywhere...besides a prison is a perfect testing environment...lots of bars incase we accidentally create a zombie.
  • Illona88
    Illona88 Posts: 903 Member
    Shampoo isn't medicine, love.

    Also they can test it in a laboratory without animals quite easily and a lot of companies do that.
    The reason they test it on animals, is because it is easier to understand for a jury, in case someone sues the cosmetic company if they've had an allergic reaction to their products. That's pretty much the only reason why big cosmetic companies test their products on animals and not in a laboratory.
  • Charlie003
    Charlie003 Posts: 1,333 Member
    would not want zombies.
  • jonward85
    jonward85 Posts: 534 Member
    would not want zombies.


    well....most of the time we wouldn't.....trust me...there are days....
  • How many times do they need to keep repeating the test. You are wrong!