Steady decrease in calories
![geicko](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/23e3/3b7c/33ed/e736/7189/889c/eef4/e5132dbebce934c70c953dd045600b095129.jpg)
geicko
Posts: 151
I've been exercising 6 days a week for almost a year now and estimated my exercise calories.
I got a heart rate monitor for Christimas ! Love the gadget, and realized I had been over-estimating what I burn during exercise.
Now... after 3 weeks of wearing my HRM, I can see that calories I burn are steadily decreasing even though I keep pushing myself, reach my target zone and maintain the same average heart rate. My 45 minutes cardio workout (Turbo Jam Cardio Party) for example, when from burning 350 calories 3 weeks ago to just over 280 this morning. I know my body becomes more efficient but since I eat my exercise calories, I've been eating less and less and I'm not sure this is right ! Note that I'm not trying to lose weight, just maintain and stay fit.
So I guess my question is if your body burns less over time, should you decrease your food intake accordingly, even through the exercise amount remains unchanged ?
I got a heart rate monitor for Christimas ! Love the gadget, and realized I had been over-estimating what I burn during exercise.
Now... after 3 weeks of wearing my HRM, I can see that calories I burn are steadily decreasing even though I keep pushing myself, reach my target zone and maintain the same average heart rate. My 45 minutes cardio workout (Turbo Jam Cardio Party) for example, when from burning 350 calories 3 weeks ago to just over 280 this morning. I know my body becomes more efficient but since I eat my exercise calories, I've been eating less and less and I'm not sure this is right ! Note that I'm not trying to lose weight, just maintain and stay fit.
So I guess my question is if your body burns less over time, should you decrease your food intake accordingly, even through the exercise amount remains unchanged ?
0
Replies
-
This does sound right to me and an HRM is a much better indicator of what you actually burn, and will decrease over time doing the same routine.
On a side note when adding your calories burned are you backing out the calories you would have burned at rest. Say in a half hour you burn 250 according to your HRM but over that time you may have burned 60 anyway, causing your net cals from exercise to be only 190 (250-60) as the 60 is already taken into account via your activity level0 -
Are you serious ? So I should not plug in the numbers from my HRM before I lower them based on the duration of the exercice ???
Gosh, I used to eat about 2000 calories but at this rate I'll be barely eating 1200 by Spring !
:sad:0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 439 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions