Your all doing it wrong!
Replies
-
I made a simple to use spreadsheet so that I could compare the various formulae:
http://68.179.34.113:9000/axs/u:c05ebc7fe5e71fdd76ef459809fbff1b/BMR-TDEE calc.xls
Just fill in the yellow boxes.
Feel free to use/share/adjust.
You have to unprotect the sheet if you are going to alter it. It's not password protected.0 -
Although this is somewhat true, long term eating below your BMR can have detrimental effects on your health. Numbers you figure on line are just that - a good estimate. Best advice? Eat about 20 - 25 % below your TDEE. The weight comes off a little slower, but you don't have those annoying side effects of losing your hair or being constantly tired & hungry.
Here's a good site that might help you put things in perspective. It has helped me SO much. Good luck!
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/654536-in-place-of-a-road-map-2-0-revised-7-2-12
I'm not so sure this is correct , mr doctor said it didnt and my dietician also said not correct.
Tell that to all the ppl losing weight using this tool.
If you eat slightly below TDEE youll target mostly fat and spare lean body mass.
If you eat too far below TDEE without the body fat to fuel it then youll either create a set point or target LBM in an attempt to slow weight loss.
Yes you can lose weight at lower rates but its a tricky some*****.
My BMR is about 1600 and TDEE is about 2500.
Dan, I know that your roadmap has become the standard 'Bible' to losing weight, and yes, it makes sense for someone wanting to lose 1 pound per week, safely and simply.
The key to this working for everyone is finding out exactly what your BMR is. The MFP and most other calculators do not take into account your BF%. They make the assumption that simply weighing more creates a larger BMR. Higher weight DOES create a larger BMR, but HOW MUCH larger depends on your body composition. At my weight, age and height, my BMR would range between 2221.75 if I were 10% BF to 575 if I were 90% BF. This creates a TDEE range from 2666 for 10% and only 690 for 90% BF.
That is a 2000 calorie per day difference to maintain.
For those who are in the very overweight or obese range, the standard BMR calculators simply give them too high of a starting number, then when they use that number to figure their TDEE, it can give them a calorie goal that will not give them a calorie deficit. Factor in discrepancies in logging calories, food database errors, and over estimating calorie burns, quite often people are finding that they actually are GAINING weight, when they think they are doing everything right. Then what I also find is that when they get discouraged and go on the message boards for help, they are simply told they need to eat more.
People on here listen to you. You have done your research and your plan can and is working for many people. Please use your celebrity on here to help those who are more overweight, and overfat, to understand how to accurately find their true BMR and Body Fat%.
BTW I am 49, 5'6", and currently weigh 210. I have a BF% of almost 50%. That gives me a BMR of 1398 and a TDEE of only 1677. Without exercising, my calorie level to lose 1 pound per week is 1177.If I want to lose 2 pounds per week, (since I still have 50 pounds more to lose), then I need to burn an additional 500 calories per day, without eating back those calories. I know this goes against the rule to not net below your BMR, but if I didn't do that, I would have a 280 calorie deficit per day and it would take me 2 years to lose the weight. That may be fine for some people, but I need to get this weight off more quickly to prevent further damage to my knees and other joints. I know that building more muscle would raise my BMR, but I cannot lift weights because of my spine and joint issues, so the limited cardio I can do is the best I can give at this point. I choose my calories very carefully to make sure I get all the nutrients in that I need and make sure my protein level is high enough to prevent major muscle loss. So far, I feel fantastic, I am no where near starving, and am averaging close to 2 pound loss per week, so it is working. I may hit a stall at some point in the future and have to make some minor adjustments, but I will do what needs to be done as that happens. I have found quite a few women in my age range that are succeeding in losing on a similar plan.
There are many other people in similar situations who are struggling to lose the extra weight for health reasons. I feel so bad for them when they get confused and frustrated by some of the blanket statements that are made on here, and can't figure out why it doesn't work for them.
Please look into the issue of how BF% affects your BMR and give us your thoughts. Thanks0 -
current 2300, km 2800.... wtf?
What body fat % did you enter?0 -
Although this is somewhat true, long term eating below your BMR can have detrimental effects on your health. Numbers you figure on line are just that - a good estimate. Best advice? Eat about 20 - 25 % below your TDEE. The weight comes off a little slower, but you don't have those annoying side effects of losing your hair or being constantly tired & hungry.
Here's a good site that might help you put things in perspective. It has helped me SO much. Good luck!
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/654536-in-place-of-a-road-map-2-0-revised-7-2-12
I'm not so sure this is correct , mr doctor said it didnt and my dietician also said not correct.
Tell that to all the ppl losing weight using this tool.
If you eat slightly below TDEE youll target mostly fat and spare lean body mass.
If you eat too far below TDEE without the body fat to fuel it then youll either create a set point or target LBM in an attempt to slow weight loss.
Yes you can lose weight at lower rates but its a tricky some*****.
My BMR is about 1600 and TDEE is about 2500.
Dan, I know that your roadmap has become the standard 'Bible' to losing weight, and yes, it makes sense for someone wanting to lose 1 pound per week, safely and simply.
The key to this working for everyone is finding out exactly what your BMR is. The MFP and most other calculators do not take into account your BF%. They make the assumption that simply weighing more creates a larger BMR. Higher weight DOES create a larger BMR, but HOW MUCH larger depends on your body composition. At my weight, age and height, my BMR would range between 2221.75 if I were 10% BF to 575 if I were 90% BF. This creates a TDEE range from 2666 for 10% and only 690 for 90% BF.
That is a 2000 calorie per day difference to maintain.
For those who are in the very overweight or obese range, the standard BMR calculators simply give them too high of a starting number, then when they use that number to figure their TDEE, it can give them a calorie goal that will not give them a calorie deficit. Factor in discrepancies in logging calories, food database errors, and over estimating calorie burns, quite often people are finding that they actually are GAINING weight, when they think they are doing everything right. Then what I also find is that when they get discouraged and go on the message boards for help, they are simply told they need to eat more.
People on here listen to you. You have done your research and your plan can and is working for many people. Please use your celebrity on here to help those who are more overweight, and overfat, to understand how to accurately find their true BMR and Body Fat%.
BTW I am 49, 5'6", and currently weigh 210. I have a BF% of almost 50%. That gives me a BMR of 1398 and a TDEE of only 1677. Without exercising, my calorie level to lose 1 pound per week is 1177.If I want to lose 2 pounds per week, (since I still have 50 pounds more to lose), then I need to burn an additional 500 calories per day, without eating back those calories. I know this goes against the rule to not net below your BMR, but if I didn't do that, I would have a 280 calorie deficit per day and it would take me 2 years to lose the weight. That may be fine for some people, but I need to get this weight off more quickly to prevent further damage to my knees and other joints. I know that building more muscle would raise my BMR, but I cannot lift weights because of my spine and joint issues, so the limited cardio I can do is the best I can give at this point. I choose my calories very carefully to make sure I get all the nutrients in that I need and make sure my protein level is high enough to prevent major muscle loss. So far, I feel fantastic, I am no where near starving, and am averaging close to 2 pound loss per week, so it is working. I may hit a stall at some point in the future and have to make some minor adjustments, but I will do what needs to be done as that happens. I have found quite a few women in my age range that are succeeding in losing on a similar plan.
There are many other people in similar situations who are struggling to lose the extra weight for health reasons. I feel so bad for them when they get confused and frustrated by some of the blanket statements that are made on here, and can't figure out why it doesn't work for them.
Please look into the issue of how BF% affects your BMR and give us your thoughts. Thanks
Heres how this can help you.
My advice is to look at a TDEE deficit of about 30-40% most days of the week.
A couple days a week hit the high numbers with the starchy carbs to boost leptin response.
you may even see better results in a cyclical fashion!
Also something to think about, at your body fat level with all that extra ATP rolling around, you can possibly build lean mass while at a deficit.
Use that advantage!
Please be lifting heavy at least 2x a week.
Use those days to be your high carb refeed days.
Case and point is the 1lb drop I had last night after eating half a pizza.
Just dont net below BMR too many days in a row so you dont trigger responses that will slow your results.
Get 10k steps a day.
Lift heavy compound movements 2x a week to maintain LBM and enjoy fat loss.
If you arent lifting heavy 2x a week think on this.
You lose the weight with VLCD and reduce LBM too much.
You get to goal weight but are skinny fat.
Skinny fat sucks and its hard to get rid of so even if its 2 years away you need to prep and train now.0 -
http://www.calculatorpro.com/calculator/katch-mcardle-bmr-calculator/
so whats your current BMR vs KM BMR?
mine is 1950 down to 1660.
Mine is MFP- 1585/ KM 13980 -
Debbie- since you can't lift weights, perhaps you could do bodyweight exercises? I would do bodyweight exercises over cardio, that would be more beneficial to creating better body composition. I recently found "You Are Your Own Gym" and it's great. Maybe something to look into? It's good for all levels of fitness. I have back issues and on the days and weeks I can't lift due to bad pain, I can do bodyweight exercises just fine. I find that bodyweight stuff actually helps the pain.0
-
I met my TDEE just reading these posts but as a dietitian -
All of these formulas are predictive estimates of a person's BMR or basal metabolic rate which is the number of calories a person burns at rest. They are all grossly inaccurate (up to 40%) when applied to the general population. Studies have been done using different formulas (e.g., Harris-Benedict, Mifflin-St. Jeor, Ireton-Jones 1997, Fick, etc.) for specific groups of patients (such as critical ill or obsese) which support the use of one formula over another with the specific group. Regardless, these equations are predictive and inaccurate but they give us a place to start.
Once you calculate your BMR, you need to calculate your TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) by taking your BMR and multipling it by various factors including an activity factor and an injury factor if someone is ill/injuried. For example, if you have a recent fracture and are healing you will expend more calories. Don't sweat trying to figure out if one formula gives you better numbers than another because you can't possibly know which formula is more accurate for you.
With this being said, the calorie content of food is generally fairly accurate because food manufactureres are required to adhere to a standard system for determining calories. But, calories posted for restaurant menus are only as accurate as the cook who follows the recipe, or not. Weighing foods is the most consistent way to determine your daily caloric intake as evidence shows that pople underestimate portion sizes.
I have clients use a bodymedia device for tracking their daily calorie expenditure and although these devices are only 90% accurate, it allows a person to gain an insight as to the relationship between exercise and calorie expenditures. I also have them use a bodyfat scale and track their percentage of body fat. These scales are also not real accurate but in general, they allow one to determine if their body fat percentage is decreasing. Together with the bodymedia device, these tools are helpful in identifying how a persons daily calorie expenditure increases as their lean body mass increases.
People start losing lean body mass (LBM) at the age of 30 and a person's BMR decreases with a decrease in LBM; this can be largly prevented by weight training and exercise. Studies have demonstrated that weight/resistance training for persons in their 90's can increase lean body weight. Using a device to track estimated daily calorie expenditure in conjunction with a bodyfat scale can assst a person in tracking their progress.0 -
I'm sorry but I can't control myself.
*You're
Forgive me for being a jerk. Feel free to post stalk me and correct my spelling.0 -
Heres how this can help you.
My advice is to look at a TDEE deficit of about 30-40% most days of the week.
A couple days a week hit the high numbers with the starchy carbs to boost leptin response.
you may even see better results in a cyclical fashion!
Also something to think about, at your body fat level with all that extra ATP rolling around, you can possibly build lean mass while at a deficit.
Use that advantage!
Please be lifting heavy at least 2x a week.
Use those days to be your high carb refeed days.
Case and point is the 1lb drop I had last night after eating half a pizza.
Just dont net below BMR too many days in a row so you dont trigger responses that will slow your results.
Get 10k steps a day.
Lift heavy compound movements 2x a week to maintain LBM and enjoy fat loss.
If you arent lifting heavy 2x a week think on this.
You lose the weight with VLCD and reduce LBM too much.
You get to goal weight but are skinny fat.
Skinny fat sucks and its hard to get rid of so even if its 2 years away you need to prep and train now.
Thanks for the tips. I simply cannot lift heavy. I have a serious spinal disease in my back and neck, plus mild RA and severe OA in my knees. I lifted heavy back in my 30s and do still have some well built quads and calves. I can ride a recumbent bike, but have to have the tension very low (2) to prevent strain on my knees and back. I do spin between 12 and 18 MPH to get my heart rate up and it is also keeping my legs fairly strong. I do planks and stretches to strengthen my core and keep my body limber. I do some arm curls with my 5 pound Barbie weights to try to tone my arms, but don't think they do much good. But I can't go any heavier without hurting my neck. My muscles are stronger than my joints, so this creates a problem with building, so I focus on maintaining as much muscle as I can.
I do eat sugar free and have cut out breads, pastas, and other simple carbs. This has resulted in a much lower pain level and reduced inflammation in my body and joints. I have experimented with this on 2 other occasions over the past 4 years and had the same result. So now I have made the decision to continue this for my life, and I am fine with that. I think of it as having an 'allergy' to sugar/simple carbs, just like someone with a peanut allergy must not eat peanuts. I get around 40-60gr complex carbs from lots of fresh veggies, nuts, and 1 fruit serving per day. Since Type 2 diabetes runs in my family, this has kept my blood sugar from getting too high and has kept me from that diagnosis for myself.
I do understand what you say about a high carb day. There have been 2 occasions in the past 2 months where my weight loss had slowed a bit, then I ate about 200-300 calories of cake, or cereal one day. The next morning my body was screaming in pain, but my weight loss picked back up again. It seems to work for maybe 1 day per month for me. I like the increase in weight loss, but not sure if the pain increase is worth it. But if I have to do it once a month to keep it going, I will. Maybe next time I will make sure it is just a grain like oatmeal, but without the added sugar and see if that helps with the pain increase.
I do need to lose at the 2 pound per week rate right now as I am trying to prevent having to have my knees replaced. I tore them up pretty badly when I was lifting heavy and had a job walking lots of stairs. The 20 pounds I have lost already had made a huge difference. When I get closer to goal weight, I know that the weight loss will be slower and I will change to a goal of 1 pound a week or less if needed. I will continue to tweak and figure out what works and what doesn't.
Thanks again.
I will try the higher carbs one day a week, but keep the sugar out and see how that goes. I will also go back and check my diaries to see if I have been doing that without realizing it already.0 -
Debbie- since you can't lift weights, perhaps you could do bodyweight exercises? I would do bodyweight exercises over cardio, that would be more beneficial to creating better body composition. I recently found "You Are Your Own Gym" and it's great. Maybe something to look into? It's good for all levels of fitness. I have back issues and on the days and weeks I can't lift due to bad pain, I can do bodyweight exercises just fine. I find that bodyweight stuff actually helps the pain.
Not sure what those are, but I will look into it. Thanks0 -
So how does this apply to my weight loss goals? I need to eat less than my BMR correct?
No. Above your BMR - under your TDEE.
So my BMR is 1571.98 (according to Katch) and my TDEE is 2419.
My goal is set to net 1400 per day (I moved it up from the 1200 MFP set)
I have not lost/gained in 3 weeks now.
Are you saying I should be eating more like 2000 calories a day?
Is this NET???0 -
Well that is sad. According to this calculator http://www.fat2fitradio.com/tools/mbf/ it is 38.8%. Blah
But according to this one http://www.fat2fitradio.com/tools/cbbf/ it is only 25.5...which seems more likely?
A good maintainable weight for me is 145...if that helps
ya, mine was 38 % on the cbbf link and 23.8 on the mbf one.. huge difference.. why??????
also mine once i used that 23.8 bf took mine from 1500 cals to 1280 for bmr... huge difference.. but the new lowe number was closer to what mfp has set
Online body fat calculators are pretty awful when it comes to being accurate. If you really want to know, get a body scan or bodpod test done. Bodpod will also give you a more accurate estimation for your BMR than an online guide will.0 -
I came across this in another post earlier today, and wondered what people thought about it.
for me it gives a much lower BMR result (which I think is more accurate) due to the inclusion of my BF%
personally I think its good. but thats because it confirms something I already had in my mind.
http://www.calculatorpro.com/calculator/katch-mcardle-bmr-calculator/
so whats your current BMR vs KM BMR?
mine is 1950 down to 1660.
A few weeks ago, I was trying to figure out the deal with this particular method to calculate BMR. It must be wrong because I have been eating over maintenance according to the Katch-McCardle method, yet still lost fat these past two weeks. I don't know why this one is so low. It certainly isn't accurate at all for me personally. I will continue to use the Harris Benedict equation that seems pretty spot-on.0 -
So right now I am 175, I am trying to eat at 1500 calories which is the 1200 MFP gives me plus about 300 for exercise I do almost every single day. My TDEE is 2310 which I think is very high for me and I didn't even account for the fact that I exercise 7 days a week. So I SHOULD eat about what, 1800 calories to lose slowly? I lost 11 pounds last month eating around 1500 most days (there were s few cheat days but not enough I dont' think to add up to 1800 a day all month long).0
-
I already used the KM BMR... so I wasn't doing it wrong0
-
I already used the KM BMR... so I wasn't doing it wrong
why didnt you tell me! lol.0 -
Hmmm
KMR 1841
BMR 2135
RMR 2133
Quite a difference.0 -
Too much math and science for me. I doubt they had all of these calculators when people stayed fit back before the golden age of technology. I agree with what other people have said, just trial and error. There isn't an exact number of calories that it'll work and not work. I see people on here all the time saying "The weight was just not coming off at 1500 so I upped it to 1510 and it comes off like butter now! :huh:0
-
Current 1347, KM 1457
For me the KM is higher due to my low body fat %.0 -
Not one person has the right formula.....
Maintenence TDEE = (Σ(Calories Eaten) - 3500*(net wt change)) / (Days)
Maintenence Non-Exercise TDEE = (Σ(Calories Eaten) - Σ(Exercise Calories Burned) - 3500*(net wt change)) / (Days)
Which to use depends on if you want to count exercise calories or not. Doing so could be more or less accurate, depending on how well you estimate exercise calories.
(fairly long time periods should be evaluated to eliminate noise, 2+ weeks)
You can't use this to set initial goals, but once you've been at it a month or more, these formulas are FAR more accurate than any of the estimate formulas. These formulas are NOT estimates, they reconcile your results with your calorie data, and due to their nature, they tend to cancel out a lot of calorie estimating error, as long as you tend to estimate calories roughly the same way.
Any other formula should only be used for initial goals in order to get enough data to use these.0 -
I get a slightly higher BMR number with the BF, but the calorie guidelines are within 27 calores/day of what I get from MFP.
All of these methods are based on models. One works better than another for you depending on how close your body is to the model they are using or how much you can adjust the model to fit you in particular.
I have averaged a pound a week with MFP, so their model seems to fit me pretty well.0 -
You're *0
-
MFP calls their calculator a BMR calculator, but then it also asks you your level of activity, giving you a TDEE estimate. What MFP calls BMR is not actual BMR.
KM is said to be a more accurate estimate because it also asks you what your body fat % is, not just an estimate on your height/weight/age.0 -
bump0
-
Bump. Because this is really good info and needs to be moved to the top!0
-
Bump. Because this is really good info and needs to be moved to the top!
It's good info for some people, but horrible for others. The best way to calculate TDEE is to log consistently over a period of time.0 -
Don't know if its been said yet but MFP uses Miffin-St Jeor equations to work out your BMR
(Copy and pasted from here...http://www.myfitnesspal.com/tools/bmr-calculator)
Our calculator uses the Mifflin-St. Jeor equations to estimate your BMR which is believed to be more accurate than the more commonly used Harris-Benedict equation.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions