Working out Calories for Turbo Trainer with Motoactv?
geebusuk
Posts: 3,348 Member
Just got myself a turbo trainer to get some cycling done regardless of weather (and I'm assigned to puppy-sitting duties this weekend, not sure if a five month old whippet can manage the >40mph descents on my usual half hour route!)
Trainer: Elite Mag Speed Alu
Computer: Motoactv with motorola HRM and speed/cadence
Bike: Charge Scourer
First focus is calorie burn as I'm nearing the end of losing 4 1/2 stone, so trying to be careful about calories in vs calories out.
(Though, of course fitness is still important - as well as general fitness, hoping to maybe do some tri's, as well as doing occasional XC events etc - may do some road events too, just for a bit of different fitness.)
On the road, the motoactv seems to provide a fairly reasonable figure for calorie burn.
However, not sure how accurate it is/will be on the turbo trainer with variable resistance. At a low resistance it seems a bit too low, but at a high, I reckon I'm putting in more effort that would burn that number of calories on the road.
If I set it to 'stationary bike' it doesn't pick up speed/cadence data, so I've been using normal cycling, but set to indoor so it doesn't try and get a GPS lock.
I've tried to find some data for the resistance offered (it has five levels), which I presume would let me work out what was going on and thus the accuracy, but can't find anything.
Trainer: Elite Mag Speed Alu
Computer: Motoactv with motorola HRM and speed/cadence
Bike: Charge Scourer
First focus is calorie burn as I'm nearing the end of losing 4 1/2 stone, so trying to be careful about calories in vs calories out.
(Though, of course fitness is still important - as well as general fitness, hoping to maybe do some tri's, as well as doing occasional XC events etc - may do some road events too, just for a bit of different fitness.)
On the road, the motoactv seems to provide a fairly reasonable figure for calorie burn.
However, not sure how accurate it is/will be on the turbo trainer with variable resistance. At a low resistance it seems a bit too low, but at a high, I reckon I'm putting in more effort that would burn that number of calories on the road.
If I set it to 'stationary bike' it doesn't pick up speed/cadence data, so I've been using normal cycling, but set to indoor so it doesn't try and get a GPS lock.
I've tried to find some data for the resistance offered (it has five levels), which I presume would let me work out what was going on and thus the accuracy, but can't find anything.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 398.4K Introduce Yourself
- 44.7K Getting Started
- 261K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.4K Food and Nutrition
- 47.7K Recipes
- 233K Fitness and Exercise
- 462 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.5K Motivation and Support
- 8.4K Challenges
- 1.4K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 17 News and Announcements
- 21 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.5K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions