Good Workout Tips Article

I read this on Fox News and thought I would share..... :bigsmile: Happy Workout Everyone!!!!

Are you undermining your workout? Fitness experts weigh in on common exercise infractions—and how to correct them easily.

1. You Need to Switch Up Your Workouts
“After doing the same cardio or strength routine three to six times, your body adapts and you burn fewer calories,” says Michael Sokol, the owner of One-on-One Fitness Personal Training Services, in Chicago and Scottsdale, Ariz.

Eventually your results—weight loss, muscle definition—will slow down. Also, repeatedly placing stress on the same muscles and joints could lead to an overuse injury.

Action plan: Once a month, change one thing about your cardio and weight-training regimens: Take a Zumba class in lieu of your Saturday walk, for instance, or use a resistance band instead of dumbbells. Bonus: Mixing things up may help you stick with exercise. A 2001 study conducted at the University of Florida, in Gainesville, found that people who varied their routines enjoyed their workouts more—and exercised more regularly—than did people who went with the same thing every day.

“Research suggests that it’s difficult to lose fat when you do only cardiovascular activity.”

- Jeff Halevy, a celebrity trainer and the CEO of Halevy Life

2. Cardio Isn’t the Magic Bullet for Weight Loss
While biking, running, and walking are great for your heart, “research suggests that it’s difficult to lose fat when you do only cardiovascular activity,” says Jeff Halevy, a celebrity trainer and the CEO of Halevy Life, a health and fitness service company in New York City. Although aerobic exercise will burn calories, it doesn’t really change your metabolism. What does: lean muscle mass. “Muscle helps you burn more calories even after your workout is over,” says Halevy. The more lean muscle mass you have, the higher your resting metabolic rate (the baseline amount of calories you burn in a day), says Wayne Westcott, Ph.D., the director of fitness research at Quincy College, in Quincy, Mass. Women tend to lose five to seven pounds of muscle in each decade of adulthood—one reason why the pounds creep on as we get older. Westcott’s research has found that if you do strength training three times a week, you can add an average of three pounds of muscle in about three months, increasing your metabolism by 6 to 7 percent.

Action plan: Keep doing cardio three times a week, but add two or three strength-training workouts. Aim to work all the major muscles over the week; complete one to two sets of eight to 12 repetitions of each exercise. To get started, check out the website of the American Council on Exercise for an extensive library of weight-training moves.

3. Wimpy Weights Will Get You Nowhere
According to the “overload principle,” for muscles to become stronger, they have to be challenged with a load that’s heavier than what they’re used to. (Think about the weight of your handbag—dinky three-pound dumbbells just don’t compare.) Without challenging your muscles, “you can’t substantially strengthen or tone them,” says Halevy.

Action plan: Choose a weight that you can lift for only 10 to 15 repetitions before losing good form—trainers call this “working to failure.” (That doesn’t mean your arms should feel like noodles when you’re done, or that you can’t bang out a second set after a minute or two of rest.) Don’t worry: You won’t bulk up. “Women’s bodies have a biological limit on how much muscle mass they can build,” says Halevy. “It’s hard for women to get big without using steroids.”

4. Muscles Come in Pairs; Train Them That Way
Most of us focus on what trainers call the mirror muscles—the ones you see when you look in the mirror (biceps, quadriceps). But just as every action has an equal and opposite reaction, every muscle has a mate that works in the opposite way. For example, you use your triceps to extend your arm and your biceps to bend it. To avoid imbalances that can lead to injury, it’s essential to train both equally.

Action plan: Consider doing weight training in what’s known as a split. Work, say, your biceps and hamstrings one day, then your triceps and quadriceps the next. This way, you’ll hit every muscle pair over the course of a week. One exception: the back muscles. “Many women have weak back muscles from working at a computer all day,” says Carly Pizzani, a New York City–based personal trainer. If you’re desk-bound from nine to five, follow a two-to-one ratio when working your back and chest. That is, for every exercise you do for the chest, do two for the back.

5. Crunches Aren’t Crucial for Strong Abdominals
“They’re not the best exercise choice, because they strengthen only a few of the muscles in your core,” says Pizzani. What’s more, if your abs are weak, doing crunches could cause a strain on your neck, since you’ll probably be pulling on it in an effort to lift your torso.

Action plan: Although you don’t have to eliminate crunches from your repertoire, you’ll get more bang for your buck with moves that work the entire core area. The plank is a good one: Lie facedown on the floor with palms down and forearms under your shoulders. Tuck your toes under and tighten your abs to lift your torso. Keep your body in one line from head to feet. Hold for 30 seconds.

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/12/23/5-things-trainers-wish-knew-about-your-workout/?intcmp=features

:heart: Life

Replies

  • BOLO4Hagatha
    BOLO4Hagatha Posts: 94 Member
    I agree with everything on this article. Maybe now that its an "article" more people will dispel many of the myths when it comes to exercising, like my personal favorite: women's shouldn't lift heavy, you will get bulky.
  • wimeezer
    wimeezer Posts: 404 Member
    thanks for sharing this!
  • Cyclink
    Cyclink Posts: 517 Member
    Like most exercise advice, it's correct to a point and only for some people, who may or may not have the same goals.

    Almost every point in the list has some accuracy.... and some issues. Then again, Fox News is not really a good source for researched fitness information (actual fitness organizations like NSCA or NEJM would be better sources to quote than a local fitness services company owner). Livestrong, for example, lists real sources on almost every article on their site.

    A mediocre tip is better than nothing, but only if they are are not misleading. Which these are.

    1) He seems to think that by lifting the same amount of weight, somehow the laws of physics change and you can move the same weight with less work completed (which is what calories actually are). You might get more efficient, but we are talking about a couple of percentage points in the number of calories burned (well within the inaccuracy of most heart monitors, which aren't made for weight lifting anyway).

    You also have to question when they try to make a statement sound more credible than it is. They quote a study from 2001 about something meaningless (that people enjoy variety in their workouts), but let a gym owner randomly quote a real number (that your body stops adapting after doing the same workout 3 to 6 times). Does owning a company mean you know anything about the technical facts of that field? Maybe, but if so, they should have listed him as "researcher at National Physiological Society", not as a CEO.

    It's not to say that variety is bad. Just that the article does a terrible job explaining the concept of progressive overload.

    2) "Research shows that?" What research? If you are going to bother adding the words "research shows", we need a credible ource. Otherwise, "research shows" that sugar pills cure almost any disease out there.

    Neither cardio nor weight lifting is the magic bullet. That would be your diet. Cardio that requires higher force output, like stair climbing and rowing, can be used to maintain, if not build, muscle.

    Also, 1 or 2 sets of 8 to 12 reps is not enough to build muscle mass. Oh, and building muscle requires a calorie surplus, something that people who are worried about losing weight might want to know.

    They are right that keeping or maintaining muscle is important. They just totally mislead the reader about what it takes to do so.

    3) "Working to failure" means needing a spotter to pull it off your chest, which actually is the best way to build larger muscle. It's also pretty unsafe and requires a partner. They should at least try to get their terms right.

    You also need to fatigue the muscle faster than that. 10 to 15 reps will build muscle at a glacial pace. Fatiguing the muscle in 6 to 8 reps s a better guideline to increase muscle mass.

    4) For people only lifting two days a week, a split routine would mean only lifting with each muscle group once a week, which is not enough to develop them.

    It's also misleading to say to train muscle pairs "equally". In each pair, one muscle will be naturally stronger than the other. If you take the statement literally, you will try to lift the same amount with both, either undertraining one or risking injury to the other.

    Add to that, they seem to think that isolation exercises like working biceps and triceps are good ideas for losing weight and they neglect to mention that some muscles, like the quads and hamstrings, are groups of muscles and can have imbalances within themselves, which is a pretty common cause of injury.

    Only women have that problem with low back strength? I'd say that's pretty universal among people with desk jobs.

    5) Core strength is not just abdominal and it certainly is not linear or isometric. The best core exercises are ones that involve a combination of linear and twisting motions which include abdominal, lower back, glutes, hamstrings, and sides.

    For one example: http://foundationtraining.com/home/


    It's articles like this that leave people wondering why they can't make progress.