HRM advice
![fraggles1805](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/f8b3/a0dd/35be/68cb/793f/48d4/ee8d/a3544ac62181d00f92b8025b273d02ea2c6d.jpg)
fraggles1805
Posts: 33 Member
Hi, am looking for a cheap heart rate monitor as have kids and just after christmas the money is a bit tight. I am in the UK. I have seen the below on Amazon.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/FITNESS-PULSE-HEART-MONITOR-RUNNING/dp/B008HCUKQC/ref=sr_1_138?s=sports&ie=UTF8&qid=1358530138&sr=1-138
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kinetik-Medical-Heart-Chest-Transmitter/dp/B003SX0UX8/ref=sr_1_59?s=sports&ie=UTF8&qid=1358529969&sr=1-59
One is just a watch and the other has a chest strap, do you need a chest strap one really? And are the cheap ones any good?
Thanks in advance.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/FITNESS-PULSE-HEART-MONITOR-RUNNING/dp/B008HCUKQC/ref=sr_1_138?s=sports&ie=UTF8&qid=1358530138&sr=1-138
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kinetik-Medical-Heart-Chest-Transmitter/dp/B003SX0UX8/ref=sr_1_59?s=sports&ie=UTF8&qid=1358529969&sr=1-59
One is just a watch and the other has a chest strap, do you need a chest strap one really? And are the cheap ones any good?
Thanks in advance.
0
Replies
-
Ones with the chest strap are definitely more accurate. I had a Mio brand one a few years ago, without a chest strap, and I really was disappointed with it. I've been using Polars ever since and I'm very happy with them. A bit pricier but to me, well worth the money. Just my two cents.0
-
HRMs with chest straps are more accurate. I have a polar ft4 and have been very happy with it. If you can spend the extra money it is well worth it.0
-
Compare prices, if you're able to get the Polar FT4 or FT7 for a few more $$ it would be worth it. I'm done buying cheap things, they break then need to be replaced, you've spent the money you would have on a good quality HRM. A HRM with a chest strap is more accurate.0
-
Honestly, (and I have a Polar with a strap that I like) - but - since you have so much weight yet to lose, I wouldn't even spend the money on one right now. It's really easy to lose weight without knowing the exact calorie burn on exercise when you have a lot of weight to lose.
For me, it makes more sense to just use online numbers (like this website) until you get to about 30-40 pounds from your goal. Then the smaller margin of error involved will be really important. Save your money up and buy a good one in a few months. You really can do this easily without one right now.
Read this:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/Azdak/view/the-real-facts-about-hrms-and-calories-what-you-need-to-know-before-purchasing-an-hrm-or-using-one-21472
^^He also has a lot of other good blog posts, you may want to read through some of them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 437 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions