Heart rate monitor or machine monitor?
![Bjninja](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/935d/2fe8/4861/58d2/85d0/b7aa/c3b9/b3bd9517020c1acbdb5bda13c620fced5cdf.jpg)
Bjninja
Posts: 44
For the last few months, I've been measuring how many calories I've burned by using the handle bars on the gym equipment. I use the same machine and always keep my hands in place, so I figured it was pretty accurate. Lately though, I am mixing strength and cardio, so I wear a strap heart rate monitor. However, the HRM readings are higher than the gym equipment readings. I want to believe my HRM is more accurate, but I don't want to overeat because I think I've burned more calories than I really have. Anyone have an opinion or a preference?
For the record, my resting calorie burning for one hour is 250, so I always take what I've burned at the gym and subtract 250, just so I know how many additional calories I've burned.
For the record, my resting calorie burning for one hour is 250, so I always take what I've burned at the gym and subtract 250, just so I know how many additional calories I've burned.
0
Replies
-
Interesting, usually my HRM is always LOWER than the machines, you are just the opposite. I would tend to believe the HRM (as long as it is set properly with your correct current weight, age, etc.) and I also have to remember to adjust my weight on my HRM too.. sometimes I would forgot to change the weight when I loss and it would be calculating incorrectly based on my old weight and not my new weight (as I started to loss). Not sure what you tell you, I received great advice was to forgot exercise points and try to stick to 1700 calories (when exercices and strength training) and try to make it a habit of eating the same every day so that your body can adjust...not eating more this day because you burned more....good luck.0
-
For the last few months, I've been measuring how many calories I've burned by using the handle bars on the gym equipment. I use the same machine and always keep my hands in place, so I figured it was pretty accurate. Lately though, I am mixing strength and cardio, so I wear a strap heart rate monitor. However, the HRM readings are higher than the gym equipment readings. I want to believe my HRM is more accurate, but I don't want to overeat because I think I've burned more calories than I really have. Anyone have an opinion or a preference?
For the record, my resting calorie burning for one hour is 250, so I always take what I've burned at the gym and subtract 250, just so I know how many additional calories I've burned.
How do you figure your resting calorie burning is 250 per hour? That means you would burn about 6000 calories a day without exercise (250 x 24) 60-100 would be more like it depending on whether you are lying in bed or moving around0 -
Always go by heart rate monitor. They are more accurate.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 439 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions