Caloric intake for preggers
2204givme
Posts: 40
Hay peeps im 11 weeks pregnant and before i was pregnant i was on a 1000 cals aday limit ( im 209 pounds) was 250 - but i have raised it to 1400. is this safe and is it ok .
0
Replies
-
I personally think you need more than 1400 cals. I'd consult your doctor.0
-
Best thing to do is consult your doctor.
You also need more calories when you are pregnant. You should be eating at least maintance caloires and adding in more calories the further you get along.
Don't go overboard, eat healthy but eat enough caloires (more than 1400). You need to stop thinking about weight loss now and think about the nutrients that your child needs.0 -
Talk to your doctor, and set your calories at "maintenance" for now. You need to be sure you're getting adequate nutrition for that baby.0
-
I watched on a T.V show called embarrassing bodies and it said you don't need to change your eating until last couple of weeks and then you only need to increase to 200 calories
Which is just 2 bananas0 -
I watched on a T.V show called embarrassing bodies and it said you don't need to change your eating until last couple of weeks and then you only need to increase to 200 calories
Which is just 2 bananas
This is not correct.
Late pregnancy requires an increased intake of 300-500 calories per day for the last 3 months. 2nd trimester requires an increased intake of closer to 200-300 calories per day. Both of these are ABOVE pre-baby TDEE (or maintenance).
OP PLEASE do not limit your calorie intake too much right now. Your baby needs enough nutrients and calories to grow and develop properly. The number on the scale should be going up. You need to come to terms with this early, as it's going to go up faster later. Not gaining weight should not be a goal right now unless your doctor advises it. Most women gain between 25 and 35 lbs during a healthy pregnancy.0 -
I watched on a T.V show called embarrassing bodies and it said you don't need to change your eating until last couple of weeks and then you only need to increase to 200 calories
Which is just 2 bananas
First trimester you should be eating at maintance... than an extra 250 the second trimester and an extra 300-500 the third I believe.
1000 or even 1400 calories is not enough to sustain a healthy, growing baby.0 -
Please eat more! You and your baby both need it. Whatever you don't take in, all the reserves go to the baby, leaving you weaker than before.0
-
Definitely consult your doctor. Now is not a time to be low calorie AT ALL! You will have time for that after the baby comes.0
-
Definitely consult your doctor. Now is not a time to be low calorie AT ALL! You will have time for that after the baby comes.0
-
Definitely consult your doctor. Now is not a time to be low calorie AT ALL! You will have time for that after the baby comes.
Yes even though you're 209 lbs.
It's almost impossible to get enough fats, protein, iron, folic acid, and calcium on a daily basis at 1400 calories.
Set your calories at maintenance. Eat.0 -
Pregosaurus gave you solid advice.
The health and development of your baby should be the priority. Talk to your doctor about your dietary needs.
Congrats on the pregnancy0 -
Definitely consult your doctor. Now is not a time to be low calorie AT ALL! You will have time for that after the baby comes.
Yes, even though you are 209lbs eat more. Eat at maintance... and even higher than that as you progress throughout your pregnancy. Do not limit your calories, do not try to lose weight, be ok with the fact that you will gain weight.
You are supposed to eat more, and gain weight while pregnant. You do not need to go overboard but you should not restrict yourself.
Your main priority right now should be your baby and it's health... not your weight loss goals. Limiting your calories so much will only result in issues with your baby as you cannot get enough nutrients on such low calories to ensure a healthy baby. Even wtihout being pregnant 1400 calories would be too low.0 -
I was about 200 pounds at around 20 weeks when I was diagnosed with gestational diabetes. My dietitian wanted me eating no fewer than 2000 calories a day and gaining at least .5 lb a week. I was never able to gain that quickly because I was eating so much better but I was consistantly between 2000 - 2500 calories a day and gave birth to a healthy 7 lb 10 oz baby.0
-
I agree with everyone that now is not the time to even be thinking about calories!
And as for your "even though I'm 209lbs".. My sister was heavier than that when she was pregnant, and actually gained less weight than a normal mother during pregnancy overall. After she gave birth, she was only carrying an extra 4lbs. And then she joined slimming world and lost another 2 stone pretty quickly once she was recovered and knew the baby was healthy (and not breastfeeding anymore), with baby weight and her daughter being her motivators!
There is time for weight loss afterwards. Hey, enjoy not having to calorie count for 9 months.. it's a perfect excuse! (Not eating for 2 though haha :P)0 -
As a Doula, I can tell you that you should still be thinking about calories - not too little, not too much.
First trimester - eat at your maintenance amount.
Second - maintenance +200
Third - maintenance +300
It's so important to eat enough and to also not "let yourself go" and eat buckets of icecream. Listen to your body and what it wants. Craving ice cream? Have some frozen yoghurt. Burger? Have a lean steak. Fries? Have some sautéed new potatoes.0 -
what she said^0
-
i was 230 when i got pregnant this time - i set myself to maintain for the first trimester (even though i ended up losing 10 lbs *grumbles @ morning sickness*) - and changed my goals to gain 0.5 lb/week sometime during the 2nd trimester. ive gained about 21 lbs so far and im 7 months along. granted ive been slacking on sticking to my goals, and going over often. you need to make sure you eat enough to grow the baby and keep you healthy.
Edited to add: ive been eating between 2200-2700 cals a day on average when sticking to my goals.0 -
I was about 200 pounds at around 20 weeks when I was diagnosed with gestational diabetes. My dietitian wanted me eating no fewer than 2000 calories a day and gaining at least .5 lb a week. I was never able to gain that quickly because I was eating so much better but I was consistantly between 2000 - 2500 calories a day and gave birth to a healthy 7 lb 10 oz baby.
^^this^^ 8 years ago when I was pregnant with my youngest, I was at high risk of developing gestational diabetes, so I underwent GD counseling around 4 months. My doctor had me on a 2200-2400 calorie diet.0 -
Please talk with your doctor to come up with an eating plan and do NOT undereat! Undereating could lead to birth defects, stillbirth, or miscarriage.
"Underweight women are also more likely to experience preterm birth, have a still birth or miscarriage, and experience pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia. Make sure your iron is up too, because you have a higher risk of anaemia if you become pregnant when you’re iron deficient.
It’s not just pregnant Mums who feel the effects of malnutrition. The unborn baby is also affected and may be born at a low birth weight or with mental retardation. There are other disorders that can occur too, like respiratory, intestinal or neurological problems. Low birth weight is associated with greater illness throughout the rest of the baby’s life. Babies born to malnourished women are more likely to die in the first month of life."
http://www.parenthub.com.au/pregnancy/pregnancy-and-food/pregnancy-diet-under-eating/
http://www.livestrong.com/article/357646-what-happens-when-you-dont-eat-while-pregnant/0 -
If you cut out sugar and grains completely, the nutrient density of your food will greatly increase without having to eat maintenance. There are negative health effects to being overweight and pregnant as well0
-
If you cut out sugar and grains completely, the nutrient density of your food will greatly increase without having to eat maintenance. There are negative health effects to being overweight and pregnant as well
There is no reason for a pregnant woman to cut out whole grains completely, unless she already has an allergy.
A) carbs are often one of the few foods women can easily stomach due to morning sickness and food aversions.
the extra fibre that comes from whole grains can help with constipation, another lovely pregnancy side effect.
Yes, a woman needs to ensure she is eating healthy, nutrient rich foods, but suggesting that she eat at a deficit is poor advice. The amount of nutrients required to grow a healthy baby are not obtained by eating a 900 calorie paleo diet.0 -
If you cut out sugar and grains completely, the nutrient density of your food will greatly increase without having to eat maintenance. There are negative health effects to being overweight and pregnant as well
There is no reason for a pregnant woman to cut out whole grains completely, unless she already has an allergy.
A) carbs are often one of the few foods women can easily stomach due to morning sickness and food aversions.
the extra fibre that comes from whole grains can help with constipation, another lovely pregnancy side effect.
Yes, a woman needs to ensure she is eating healthy, nutrient rich foods, but suggesting that she eat at a deficit is poor advice. The amount of nutrients required to grow a healthy baby are not obtained by eating a 900 calorie paleo diet.
^ Everything she said.
Also, here's a good breakdown of where the weight goes:
Baby: 8 pounds
Placenta: 2-3 pounds
Amniotic fluid: 2-3 pounds
Breast tissue: 2-3 pounds
Blood supply: 4 pounds
Stored fat for delivery and breastfeeding: 5-9 pounds
Larger uterus: 2-5 pounds
Total: 25-35 pounds0 -
I'm 122 pounds and am eating 1665 calories during the first trimester which is maintenance for me. You definitely need to eat more than that but just don't go crazy!0
-
If you cut out sugar and grains completely, the nutrient density of your food will greatly increase without having to eat maintenance. There are negative health effects to being overweight and pregnant as well
There is no reason for a pregnant woman to cut out whole grains completely, unless she already has an allergy.
A) carbs are often one of the few foods women can easily stomach due to morning sickness and food aversions.
the extra fibre that comes from whole grains can help with constipation, another lovely pregnancy side effect.
Yes, a woman needs to ensure she is eating healthy, nutrient rich foods, but suggesting that she eat at a deficit is poor advice. The amount of nutrients required to grow a healthy baby are not obtained by eating a 900 calorie paleo diet.
Who said 900 calories, and who mentioned no carbs? If she is 200 she can eat 1800 and still be on a deficit. Whole grains have basically no nutritional value compared to something like beef liver or a sweet potato with grass fed butter. Might as well eat raw sugar.0 -
Who said 900 calories, and who mentioned no carbs? If she is 200 she can eat 1800 and still be on a deficit. Whole grains have basically no nutritional value compared to something like beef liver or a sweet potato with grass fed butter.
You entirely missed the point that we are all explaining to the OP. A calorie deficit is not appropriate for pregnancy. Women who are pregnant need more calories than women who are not, even overweight and obese women.
It's clear that you really don't understand the nutritional needs of pregnancy and have a very anti-grain and sugar agenda. Telling a woman to cut out all grains and sugar and eat at a deficit, against all nutritional recommendations currently advocated, is irresponsible at best.0 -
If you cut out sugar and grains completely, the nutrient density of your food will greatly increase without having to eat maintenance. There are negative health effects to being overweight and pregnant as well
There is no reason for a pregnant woman to cut out whole grains completely, unless she already has an allergy.
A) carbs are often one of the few foods women can easily stomach due to morning sickness and food aversions.
the extra fibre that comes from whole grains can help with constipation, another lovely pregnancy side effect.
Yes, a woman needs to ensure she is eating healthy, nutrient rich foods, but suggesting that she eat at a deficit is poor advice. The amount of nutrients required to grow a healthy baby are not obtained by eating a 900 calorie paleo diet.
Who said 900 calories, and who mentioned no carbs? If she is 200 she can eat 1800 and still be on a deficit. Whole grains have basically no nutritional value compared to something like beef liver or a sweet potato with grass fed butter. Might as well eat raw sugar.
No...just...no. I was over 200 pounds during my second pregnancy, and my doctor told me to maintain my weight and eat healthfully. Cutting out sugar wasn't part of the recommendation.
OP, eat a variety of healthy foods. Period. Don't worry about losing weight during pregnancy. It's stressful enough without adding that on top of it.0 -
Who said 900 calories, and who mentioned no carbs? If she is 200 she can eat 1800 and still be on a deficit. Whole grains have basically no nutritional value compared to something like beef liver or a sweet potato with grass fed butter.
You entirely missed the point that we are all explaining to the OP. A calorie deficit is not appropriate for pregnancy. Women who are pregnant need more calories than women who are not, even overweight and obese women.
It's clear that you really don't understand the nutritional needs of pregnancy and have a very anti-grain and sugar agenda. Your information is both bad and downright dangerous.
Tell me, if you wanted to eat the most nutrient-dense diet you could, what would it contain? I'll tell you what it wouldn't contain, it wouldn't contain any nutritionally-void grains for sure. You would be eating tons of offal, whole eggs, full fat dairy, and plenty of vegetables.
It is incorrect to state a calorie deficit is not appropriate for pregnancy. There are plenty of situations where it is in fact appropriate. The concern here is nutrient availability, not calories. I would love to hear your reasons for WHY the mother cannot lose body fat(slowly) as long as she is eating a nutrient-dense diet? (besides your doctor said so(my doctor said squatting is bad for your back))0 -
Who said 900 calories, and who mentioned no carbs? If she is 200 she can eat 1800 and still be on a deficit. Whole grains have basically no nutritional value compared to something like beef liver or a sweet potato with grass fed butter.
You entirely missed the point that we are all explaining to the OP. A calorie deficit is not appropriate for pregnancy. Women who are pregnant need more calories than women who are not, even overweight and obese women.
It's clear that you really don't understand the nutritional needs of pregnancy and have a very anti-grain and sugar agenda. Your information is both bad and downright dangerous.
Tell me, if you wanted to eat the most nutrient-dense diet you could, what would it contain? I'll tell you what it wouldn't contain, it wouldn't contain any nutritionally-void grains for sure. You would be eating tons of offal, whole eggs, full fat dairy, and plenty of vegetables.
It is incorrect to state a calorie deficit is not appropriate for pregnancy. There are plenty of situations where it is in fact appropriate. The concern here is nutrient availability, not calories. I would love to hear your reasons for WHY the mother cannot lose body fat(slowly) as long as she is eating a nutrient-dense diet? (besides your doctor said so(my doctor said squatting is bad for your back))
28YO Male...hmmm...you've been pregnant, then? Didn't think so.0 -
As a Doula, I can tell you that you should still be thinking about calories - not too little, not too much.
First trimester - eat at your maintenance amount.
Second - maintenance +200
Third - maintenance +300
It's so important to eat enough and to also not "let yourself go" and eat buckets of icecream. Listen to your body and what it wants. Craving ice cream? Have some frozen yoghurt. Burger? Have a lean steak. Fries? Have some sautéed new potatoes.
This is great advice.0 -
Maybe this is silly, but I think it would be nice if MFP had an "I'm pregnant" choice in the drop-down. Then it could do the math automatically. I imagine OP isn't the only pregnant woman who worries about eating the right number of calories.
Or, if that isn't possible, maybe just a footnote near it that says, "Pregnant women click here," with a link to this topic or a FAQ or whatever that explains you should be eating maintenance + 200/300.
I've never been pregnant, but I assumed doctors cover this in the initial visit? Is nutrition normally addressed right away or only after a certain number of months (or if the mother isn't at the proper weight)?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions