Fitbit vs HRM
Mary2302
Posts: 27 Member
Hi.. Im want to buy a monitor to have a better look at my workouts and work on my troubled zones.. I've heard a lot a good reviews about the fitbit one.. but, since is not a HRM, I don't know if it will be accurate when Im working out at home.. i'm not a big fan of the Chest strap.. but if I have to wear it .. I will.. I just want to know which one is better..???
If you have any good recomendations about HRM (accurate) please help me.. there is so many differents out there.. I'll be lost
Thanks y'all
If you have any good recomendations about HRM (accurate) please help me.. there is so many differents out there.. I'll be lost
Thanks y'all
0
Replies
-
I don't know if anyone will have a definitive answer to which one is better. I have a Polar FT4 HRM and I love it. i'm not knocking Fitbit or any other HRM cause i don't have them so i don't know. I was skeptical about the chest strap as well as i didn't want one with a strap but after i gave in and got it I honestlt forget i'm wearing it unless do an exercise where i'm laying down (like hamstring curls). Polar is a little pricey but come with good reviews and a lot of recommendations. But again you have to pick whats best for you and fits in your budget. I just didn't want to get somethign cheap and then end up upgrading. So I went with Polar HRM. Not sure if this was helpful0
-
I got polar h7 strap and iRunner digifit app pro
Logs everything on my phone. It absolutely brilliant.
I'm a nerd and love seeing graphs and pie charts. Totally cool0 -
Thanks a lot.. I don't want that to happen to me neither (buy something cheap and then end up having to spend more money b/c it wasn't what I expect it..) ..0
-
thanks0
-
I have the garmin fr70. Love love love it. Chest strap is not uncomfortable at all. I wear it every day at least 8 hours a day because I am on meds and like to keep an eye on my heart rate. I have found the foot pod and the chest strap to give VERY different numbers on calorie burn when running outside, but other than that, I cant imagine a day without it.0
-
I use both a Fitbit and an HRM. I have an HRM with a chest strap that connects via bluetooth to my Android phone and syncs up to the Endomondo app to keep accurate calorie counts. I use the Fitbit for daily activities other than dedicated workouts, and I use the HRM + Endo for workouts. I simply add the 2 together for total daily calories (TDEE). It works great for me.
Edited to add that I use the HRM that you can buy from the Endomondo website. The strap is actually comfy because it is stretchy cloth without the pinchy plastic that most HRMs have.0 -
I still can't fathom a reason to think an HRM would be better than the Fitbit, which measures your actual movement and therefore energy expenditure. The accuracy of an HRM depends heavily on your VO2, which you just won't know and can only estimate.
HRM calories burned seemed to be consistently higher for pretty much everyone who compares, which is a big red flag to me. I'm a huge geek and I'm really, really into data collection. I'd buy an HRM in a second if I thought it provided a more accurate picture than the Fitbit, but I just don't see it.0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.0
-
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
what this person means is that a fitbit is more of a measure of general activity. It couldnt give you remotely accurate figures for an intense cardio workout in the same way a HRM with a chest band would be useless in monitoring your sleep, which is a fitbit feature.
if you want a decent, accurate figure for a WORKOUT, then get a HRM with a chest band.
If you want an activity meter, get a nike fuelband.0 -
It couldnt give you remotely accurate figures for an intense cardio workout in the same way a HRM with a chest band would be useless in monitoring your sleep, which is a fitbit feature.
Why? Offer a real explanation.0 -
I can't speak on any of the HRM's out there, but I've been using the Fitbit for about 7-8 months and love it! It is more than a pedometer in that it registers steps as well as floors. The one that I have also comes with a wrist strap and registers movement while you sleep. It has been very helpful for me to get a better idea of why I had been so tired (moving a ton while I sleep!). I've made some changes in eating habits resulting in a big improvement there.
The FB syncs well with MFP and since I've been recording all my food (more food in database on MFP) and tracking my calories better, I've had more success in shedding pounds.
I track my activity in Fitbit and foods in MFP... the two combined make for success in my book!0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.
FWIW, I wear my Fitbit all the time and I'm rather active. I play a lot of tennis and raquetball, lift 3 times a week, etc. On the treadmill, the Fitbit gives virtually identical calorie burns as the treadmill itself. The Fitbit shows me burning ~400 calories an hour during a typical singles tennis match, which 'feels' about right to me given my level of exertion. A 2-hour racquetball session gives me around 750. These are fairly intense activities and the Fitbit seems spot-on all the time.0 -
It couldnt give you remotely accurate figures for an intense cardio workout in the same way a HRM with a chest band would be useless in monitoring your sleep, which is a fitbit feature.
Why? Offer a real explanation.
because it isn't engineered or designed to do that. thats like asking why don't marathon runners race in ice skates.0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.
FWIW, I wear my Fitbit all the time and I'm rather active. I play a lot of tennis and raquetball, lift 3 times a week, etc. On the treadmill, the Fitbit gives virtually identical calorie burns as the treadmill itself. The Fitbit shows me burning ~400 calories an hour during a typical singles tennis match, which 'feels' about right to me given my level of exertion. A 2-hour racquetball session gives me around 750. These are fairly intense activities and the Fitbit seems spot-on all the time.
i ran 20 miles today. I "felt" like I had burnt 6,000 calories. My HRM said only 2,200.0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.
FWIW, I wear my Fitbit all the time and I'm rather active. I play a lot of tennis and raquetball, lift 3 times a week, etc. On the treadmill, the Fitbit gives virtually identical calorie burns as the treadmill itself. The Fitbit shows me burning ~400 calories an hour during a typical singles tennis match, which 'feels' about right to me given my level of exertion. A 2-hour racquetball session gives me around 750. These are fairly intense activities and the Fitbit seems spot-on all the time.
i ran 20 miles today. I "felt" like I had burnt 6,000 calories. My HRM said only 2,200.
You're pretty bad at estimating your own calorie burn then aren't you
0 -
The expensive HRM's allow you to input your VO2 to get a more accurate calorie expenditure:
http://www8.garmin.com/train-with-garmin/metabolic-testing.html
Or have a fitness test to attempt to calculate your VO2 max:
http://www.polar.com/en/support/How_to_perform_Polar_Fitness_Test
They are expensive though.
Fitbit doesn't have this ability so an expensive HRM would be more accurate than a fitbit. It also doesn't work well for some sports that don't involve steps as that is it's primary function. A fitbit is good for everyday activity measurement though.0 -
Fitbit looks pretty neat and all.. but I love my Polar FT4 HRM
I am a girl and I don't mind the chest strap in the least bit! I actually forget to take it off sometimes.. I forget its there until I'm getting in the shower. 0 -
The expensive HRM's allow you to input your VO2 to get a more accurate calorie expenditure:
http://www8.garmin.com/train-with-garmin/metabolic-testing.html
Or have a fitness test to attempt to calculate your VO2 max:
http://www.polar.com/en/support/How_to_perform_Polar_Fitness_Test
They are expensive though.
Fitbit doesn't have this ability so an expensive HRM would be more accurate than a fitbit. It also doesn't work well for some sports that don't involve steps as that is it's primary function. A fitbit is good for everyday activity measurement though.
Yes, I agree that if you actually knew your VO2 max, and were able to keep the measurement up as you progressed in your training, it would be more useful to determine calories.0 -
I use both a Polar FT7 and a Fitbit Zip. Combo is great. If you aren't interested in monitoring sleep, the Zip is a relatively inexpensive option. I find its greatest worth is the motivation - I WILL make those 10,000 steps EVERY DAY!!! Polar's "soft strap" is very comfy, BTW.0
-
I find FitBit is good for:
running and walking (including on the treadmill)
daily non-exercise activity (e.g. cooking/cleaning/looking after kids - surprisingly active activities)
It is not so good for
swimming (because you can't take it with you into the pool)
ice skating
weight lifting (but neither is a HRM)
going on the travelators (walking escalators on a slope - it thinks you are climbing stairs)0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.
FWIW, I wear my Fitbit all the time and I'm rather active. I play a lot of tennis and raquetball, lift 3 times a week, etc. On the treadmill, the Fitbit gives virtually identical calorie burns as the treadmill itself. The Fitbit shows me burning ~400 calories an hour during a typical singles tennis match, which 'feels' about right to me given my level of exertion. A 2-hour racquetball session gives me around 750. These are fairly intense activities and the Fitbit seems spot-on all the time.
i ran 20 miles today. I "felt" like I had burnt 6,000 calories. My HRM said only 2,200.
You're pretty bad at estimating your own calorie burn then aren't you
which is exactly why I use something that is engineered specifically to take the guess work away from me..0 -
A FitBit is a glorified pedometer. It doesn't know the intensity of your movements just that you're moving. At least a HRM is using your HR as an indicator of effort.
No, this is totally wrong.
I don't know what "intensity" means and I doubt if you could offer a realistic definition of what you mean either. The Fitbit records acceleration in 3 dimensions. It also knows your mass. It can rather accurately calculate energy expenditure using acceleration and mass. There's a reason it works so well for people.
Good to know. I bought both. Haven't recieved the flex and the polar is on the way. I'll prob end up keeping both then. The flex sounded too cool not to order.
FWIW, I wear my Fitbit all the time and I'm rather active. I play a lot of tennis and raquetball, lift 3 times a week, etc. On the treadmill, the Fitbit gives virtually identical calorie burns as the treadmill itself. The Fitbit shows me burning ~400 calories an hour during a typical singles tennis match, which 'feels' about right to me given my level of exertion. A 2-hour racquetball session gives me around 750. These are fairly intense activities and the Fitbit seems spot-on all the time.
i ran 20 miles today. I "felt" like I had burnt 6,000 calories. My HRM said only 2,200.
You're pretty bad at estimating your own calorie burn then aren't you
which is exactly why I use something that is engineered specifically to take the guess work away from me..
Indeed. What do you think a Fitbit would have said?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions