Lost 58 pounds and only 9% body fat?
BIW2012
Posts: 97 Member
When I started losing weight I had my body fat percentage measured. I'm perplexed by the numbers - lost 58 pounds and apparently only 9% body fat?
Stats were
Weight: 236 pounds
BF: 48%
Just this week, I was measured by my personal trainer. My new stats are:
Weight: 178 pounds
BF: 39%
= loss of 58 lbs and 9% body fat.
Something doesn't add up for me: If I'm aiming for a healthy body fat % of around 25%, going by the numbers above, I'll need to lose around another 87 pounds or so!
Does anyone out there know more about BF % than me?
Note: The before and after measurements were taken on two different scales. One with a nutritionist and one with a personal trainer. Both professionals have good equipment and charge $70-$95 per hour. Looks like one of the scales might be out, but it seems like it would have to me way out!
Stats were
Weight: 236 pounds
BF: 48%
Just this week, I was measured by my personal trainer. My new stats are:
Weight: 178 pounds
BF: 39%
= loss of 58 lbs and 9% body fat.
Something doesn't add up for me: If I'm aiming for a healthy body fat % of around 25%, going by the numbers above, I'll need to lose around another 87 pounds or so!
Does anyone out there know more about BF % than me?
Note: The before and after measurements were taken on two different scales. One with a nutritionist and one with a personal trainer. Both professionals have good equipment and charge $70-$95 per hour. Looks like one of the scales might be out, but it seems like it would have to me way out!
0
Replies
-
were you measured by calipers? unless you had your body fat measured in a bod pod, hydrostatic (water) tank or by a dexa scan, it likely has a large margin of error.
also, when you lose weight, you typically lose fat and muscle - just how much depends on many factors like how much you're eating, how much protein and whether you're also doing strength training.
my advice? get your body fat checked at a body pod or dexa scan, then you'll know what you're really working with. i think bod pod is the cheapest of the three with almost as low margin of error. universities usually have them.
btw - you didn't exactly lose 9% body fat, even if both measurements were accurate.
weight: 236
bf%: 48
fat lbs: 113.3
lean muscle lbs: 122.7
weight: 178
bf%: 39
fat lbs: 69.4
lean muscle lbs: 108.6
so for your 58 lbs lost, 43.9 of those were fat and 14.1 were muscle. that's actually not that bad. that's about a 3/1 ratio of fat to muscle lost, which i understand is quite decent.
are you doing strength training? if not, you might want to start. it will help you hold on to even more muscle.0 -
Wow thanks guys - you went to so much trouble to do all those calculations. I really appreciate your time!
Sounds like it's not quite as simple as I thought. I would have lost a bit of muscle last year as I was way under-eating and only doing cardio.
I'm doing some strength now - 30DS. Not hard core lifting but I have definitely build more muscle.
I'd love to do one of those more accurate measurements as I'd like to focus on a body fat % goal rather than a weight goal.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions