1RM calculators
HealthyBodySickMind
Posts: 1,207 Member
Perhaps this is an odd question, but before Sunday, I didn't have a squat rack and because of that was not squatting as heavy as I would have liked, instead doing more reps of a lower weight. I was creative and less than safe in getting the bar to my back. Now that I've got a squat rack, this question is perhaps less relevant, but I'm still curious so that I can compare past results.
For most 1rm calculators (I like this one: http://www.strstd.com/) where do you think the cut off is for number of reps for a good estimation?
For example, if you can only get 4 reps at a certain weight, I'm sure that would be a pretty close estimate to a 1rm, but if you are doing 20 reps at a weight and trying to calculate a 1rm from that, it's certain to be off a bit. So where is the cut off for a fairly accurate estimate?
I know this is a vague question, and I'm sure I will get some smart as s replies, and that's all fine and entertaining, but if anyone has an actual guideline that they've found, and maybe even a source, for the tolerance of those calculations, I would appreciate it.
For most 1rm calculators (I like this one: http://www.strstd.com/) where do you think the cut off is for number of reps for a good estimation?
For example, if you can only get 4 reps at a certain weight, I'm sure that would be a pretty close estimate to a 1rm, but if you are doing 20 reps at a weight and trying to calculate a 1rm from that, it's certain to be off a bit. So where is the cut off for a fairly accurate estimate?
I know this is a vague question, and I'm sure I will get some smart as s replies, and that's all fine and entertaining, but if anyone has an actual guideline that they've found, and maybe even a source, for the tolerance of those calculations, I would appreciate it.
0
Replies
-
Depends on the person, but in my experience I'd say 8+ reps is getting to be too many.
For example, I can bench 135x8. The calculators say that gives a roughly 168-lb 1RM. I will tell you straight up there's no way I could bench 168. I can also do 140x5, which comes out to around 158 which is a bit more realistic.0 -
I always found that anything past 3 reps or so they were off by an increasing margin. If you really want to figure out your 1RM, take 6-8 weeks and use a periodization routine to gradually increase your weight used and lower your reps, and then test for your 1RM.
I looked at that 5/3/1 site. My last deadlift workout I did 5 reps of 395 and it was pretty hard to finish. It projects my 1RM at 475. There is no way I could pull that right now without training for it like I mentioned above.0 -
I always found that anything past 3 reps or so they were off by an increasing margin. If you really want to figure out your 1RM, take 6-8 weeks and use a periodization routine to gradually increase your weight used and lower your reps, and then test for your 1RM.
I looked at that 5/3/1 site. My last deadlift workout I did 5 reps of 395 and it was pretty hard to finish. It projects my 1RM at 475. There is no way I could pull that right now without training for it like I mentioned above.
I think I can actually safely test for a 1rm, now that I have a squat rack.
Is there another calculator you use/like, since the 5/3/1 one is off?0 -
I don't use any of them. When I needed to know my 1RM, I trained and tested for it by doing a powerlifting meet.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions