Do you round up or down?

HealthyBodySickMind

Science rounds to nearest even number...

I am a scientist and I disagree. 4.5 rounds to 5 not 4.

I couldn't even interpret the post you're quoting I think that person must mean "even = whole", and there is also ambiguity as to whether "rounds to" means "rounds up to" or "rounds down to". I've never seen any convention in science of rounding to an even number as opposed to odd--though who knows, maybe that happens. In typical scientific usage, .5 is rounded up, not down.

It actually may be some obscure convention. Where I work, all the older chemists (like didn't even have computers when they got their degrees old) have some odd conventions they adhere to that are completely different from what I was taught. I don't remember an "even" number convention being one of them, but that doesn't mean that some odd discipline doesn't use it. It's wrong to say that "science" does it though, as the wider scientific community would round .5 up.

Totally agree. If there is such a convention, it is not in wide use. Normal refereed journals will have you round up from .5 if you are not reporting to, say, two decimal pts (which is more likely anyway).

Indeed. It would depend on the precision of the measuring tool, but any 5 rounds up.

crista_b

Can't you change the settings to cm, which is a more accurate measurement?

This seems like the best option posted here.

I'm about 5'9.5" but I've said 5'9" for years; being 69" tall just entertains me more.

I'm 5'9" and I love entering 69" as my height because I can be quite immature at times. :laugh:

greenmonstergirl

Who cares. It is so unimportant. Move on to more relevant matters.

Can you please tell me what is more relevant that I should move on to? I didn't say it was a big deal. That's why I posted in "Chit-Chat, Fun and Games" not the "General Diet and Weight Loss" forum. But hey thanks for taking time out of your day to comment on such an unimportant question to tell me it's unimportant.

This is when I wish we had a "LIKE" button to push! You tell em!

SpeSHul_SnoflEHk

Can't you change the settings to cm, which is a more accurate measurement?

Blasphemy!! metric system.. ha!!

MizTerry

I round up, unless it comes to calories burned, then I try to keep it to the nearest whole number possible. If I burn 128.2 calories, I say I burned 128. If it says 183.6, I say I burned 184.

freebirdjones

:laugh: could somebody plz tell me how u reply to another's post! iam have'in no luck! lol thanx

Hit the quote button instead of reply.

lol, thanx

baneboy

:laugh: could somebody plz tell me how u reply to another's post! iam have'in no luck! lol thanx

Hit the quote button instead of reply.

thanx

neandermagnon

As far as I'm aware, I'm 5 feet and three quarters of an inch tall. I'm 154cm according to the height measuring thing in the hospital. I say I'm 5'1" because "five foot one" is three syllables, while "five feet and three quarters of an inch" is 9 syllables and I really can't be bothered. Honestly if anyone considers me or anyone else rounding up half or a quarter of an inch to be lying, I'd want to know why they care so very much about how tall someone is to be so pedantic about it.

Mathematically speaking, if it's exactly half or more than half, you round up, if it's less than half you round down. So mathematically speaking 5'4.5" should be rounded up to 5'5" and not down.

It can get silly though, because at 154cm, I could in theory round my height up to 2m to the nearest metre. That would be failing to use the correct degree of accuracy and would be a science fail rather than a maths fail.

JenAndSome

Can't you change the settings to cm, which is a more accurate measurement?

Blasphemy!! metric system.. ha!!

That's the first thing that popped into my head. :laugh:

I suppose I could, but then I would have to work out all of the conversions for the rest of my measurements and weight.
This could be fun! :bigsmile:

jdad1

Who cares. It is so unimportant. Move on to more relevant matters.

Can you please tell me what is more relevant that I should move on to? I didn't say it was a big deal. That's why I posted in "Chit-Chat, Fun and Games" not the "General Diet and Weight Loss" forum. But hey thanks for taking time out of your day to comment on such an unimportant question to tell me it's unimportant.

This is when I wish we had a "LIKE" button to push! You tell em!

yeah right...I was ignoring this but heck. It is unimportant because the difference in calories is less then about 30. It makes no significant impact on a persons weight loss in the long run. Just say you are taller so you can feel better and move on, or go with shorter and get a lower calorie calculation. Thinking about this subject is just showing insecurities in height. It is not a big deal either way. This is why I commented. To try and help.......help the OP to move on to more important issues. (I was assuming that this was considered important to her or she would not have made the post. Clearly I thought she was more serious then she actually was.) Man you are all giants compared to my wife anyway (4'10'') so don't worry about a half of an inch.

PartyHardeeIsGettingHot

So I am 5' 6 1/2. I always wondered about this. It never crossed my mind to try cm. So I googled my height in ft to cm and it still gives you decimals. I am 168.91cm. So I'm practically 169. I'm going to change it to 169. It'll be more accurate than ft and in.
Good advice to those who said it.

PartyHardeeIsGettingHot

So I added it into myfitnesspal, and my calories are 20 less now.
I wonder why?

wwwtheselion11

JenAndSome wrote: »

I'm 5' 4 1/2" and I always say it just like that. On here and my HRM it doesn't allow for half inches so my question is, do other people round up or down? I've always rounded down, but I'm thinking of changing it. It would be nice to be able to say I'm 5' 5" and not feel like a liar.

I honestly did not know, you could ,there was a half in height. I would say 5/4. If you feel 5/4,