We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Borderline obese?!?

tschaff04
tschaff04 Posts: 296 Member
edited January 24 in Motivation and Support
I know scales can be deceiving, and are just numbers, etc. But how accurate are the bf% numbers on scales? Mine gives you your weight, bf%, water%, and bmi.

I am 5'5 and weigh 160 pounds according to my scale. But it also says my bf% is 39!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :noway: :cry:

I went and looked up %'s and what's normal, over, under etc. and apparently I am borderline obese at 160 pounds?!?! Anything above 39% is obese. I don't feel obese, I don't look obese( I HOPE!), and I would never guess someone who is 5'5 and 160 is obese.

So what gives? Are the bf% numbers even close to accurate on scales? I know the only way to get an accurate number is to use those little measuring tools, but I also know people say the next best thing is to use calculators(all give me way different numbers), and scales.

What's your experience?

Replies

  • mazdauk
    mazdauk Posts: 1,380 Member
    Have a look at a few websites until you find an "average" answer - most measure your height as well.

    ETA I'm about the same and NHS website says I WAS obese but now I'm overweight. :ohwell:
  • tschaff04
    tschaff04 Posts: 296 Member
    F2FR Original calculator says 27.1%
    F2FR Military calculator says 38.7%
    F2FR Covert Bailey calc says 18.2% :laugh: :laugh:
  • TammyKeaten
    TammyKeaten Posts: 61 Member
    In your pictures you are far from obese! Don't worry!
  • Pearsquared
    Pearsquared Posts: 1,656 Member
    I'm 160 as well, and I am considered obese...but I'm only 5'1''. Different measuring tools will yield different results (in my case, one measuring tool measured different results each time, and it was an online tool!)
  • Velum_cado
    Velum_cado Posts: 1,608 Member
    I'm no longer "morbidly obese", just regular, boring obese. Yay! Haha
  • dsmpunk
    dsmpunk Posts: 262 Member
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10054519/Waist-to-height-ratio-more-accurate-than-BMI.html

    This is what I go off of. According to this (at 74") I should have a 37" or smaller waist. Currently at 39 which will be very close to my "normal weight" BMI.
  • tschaff04
    tschaff04 Posts: 296 Member
    dsmpunk, I read your link. I just have one question. The top of my waist(where most people would measure at their belly button), the crease when I bend sideways is 33 inches. That would be half my height. So yay, right! But then here is where I get confused. I have a saggy belly(three children, large weight loss, and just dna/genes I suppose. It's always been hangy). It's gotten better since losing the weight but still slightly hangs over my pants. So do I measure at my belly button, which because of saggy skin/flab would make my measurement 40 inches, or do I measure at the top of my waist where it creases, which is 33. This always confuses me.
This discussion has been closed.