When do you weigh you meat?

i also weigh before.

Always weigh prior to cooking.

4oz of raw, boneless skinless chicken breast is 120calories. You cook it, one of two things happens:
1. you cook it perfectly and it's moist and juicy in the middle still, it now weighs about 3.5oz because of the water is lost while cooking.
2. you overcook it and it's now sorta dry and tough, it now weighs about 3 oz because it lost a lot more water.

If you weigh outcome 1, you'll be entering 105 calories for that 120 calories of chicken breast.
If you weigh outcome 2, you'll be entering 90 calories for that 120 calories of chicken breast.

Yes, some fattier meats will lose some of the fat while cooking, but it's still always meant to weighed raw since there is no way to account for how much or how little of anything is actually going to cook out of the meat. If you order a 1/4 pound burger at a restaurant, you are getting a burger that weighed 1/4 of a pound before it was cooked, because that's just the standardized way that meat is weighed and nutritionally recorded.

after because I don't now how much of a roast i may want

Friday mornings

Ideally before it's cooked as the nutrition labeling is based on pre-cooked weight.. However if you have cooked meat in front of you, still go ahead and weigh it as something as minor as that is not going to derail your weight loss goals

what if your recording the calories for grilled chicken or grilled steak not raw

Then you're estimating even more than we already do with calories since you have no idea how the person cooked their meat or what the "official" doneness was on the already cooked meat that the calories were entered for.

Looking at my original example, what if, knowing that the chicken breast was 120 calories worth of meat, I cooked it to outcome 1 results, then entered that it was 3.5oz of meat for 120 calories.
Then you cooked some chicken breast to outcome 2 results, weighed it, found you had 3oz of meat but used my entry for grilled chicken.
You'd then lower the amount to 3oz instead of 3.5oz, since that's how much you have, and end up recording 103 calories instead of 120.

I always weigh after. If I am getting 3 ozs of calories, I want 3 ozs of steak, dammit!

Doesn't matter as long as you use the correct calorie count per weight measure for whether it's cooked or raw and, if cooked, what cooking method was used.

I always use the raw weight because I feel it's more consistent.

Friday mornings

:laugh:

I think I'm going to try to find some time soon to make a video about this topic. The videos that people post for weighing vs measuring food and the drinking of two cups of water making you gain a pound always seem to resonate better.

My six years of working in a kitchen and trying to give food advice on how foods should be weighed prior to cooking and the professional reasons why always seem to just fall on dear ears (blind eyes) and it makes me sad to think of how many diaries are out there with underestimated calories.

Everything we do here is already a best guess scenario based on FDA guidelines allowing variances on labels and there being no way to ensure consistency with naturally raised/grown products. Why allow for even more discrepancies when it's really easy to just weigh prior to cooking instead of after.

Cooking a whole roast and you *have* to weigh after you say? Not true - just weigh the entire thing before cooking, then weigh it again after. Weigh the piece that you cut off to serve yourself. Using the pre-cooked weight and the cooked weight, then calculate how much of the overall weight your serving was and use that to get your calories.

*sigh* Sometimes I wonder why I try.