BMI does not always apply to every body type

Options
I read a an article in the Calgary Herald that I thought would be nice to share. Hopeflly people do not stress too much about weight and BMI because you can weigh more and have a high BMI but not be overfat. Here it is:

The question sounds simple but is a complicated answer: How much should I weigh?

You may have heard that the best way to assess your proper weight is by looking at body-mass index (BMI), which correlates your height and weight into health ranges. While this is a starting place it is certainly not the end-all-be-all.

Here are two examples of clients in my practice that used BMI to assess how much they should weigh and the challenges that arose because of this.

Melanie, a 55-year-old menopausal woman had lost and gained the same 50 pounds over the years. She had high blood pressure and suffered from depression. At five-foot-four and 230 pounds, her BMI labelled her obese. This five-letter word was deflating. After years of trying to achieve a healthy BMI range of 108 to 145 pounds with no success, Melanie decided to let it go. Looking back at her history it became clear that even when she was eating and exercising almost perfectly she was never able to nudge lower than 170 pounds. Over time Melanie found peace with her weight and success-fully now maintains a weight of 175 to 185 pounds. Despite BMI still classifying her as obese, she has more fun, better flexibility with her food, lowered knee pain and has dropped her blood pressure.

At 16, Beth remembers feeling bigger than most girls in her class. At five-foot-six and 170 pounds she started dieting and exercising excessively. She got to 120 pounds by being severely bulimic. At 19, a well-intended health professional that didn't know the punishing regime Beth had been following for years, suggested that she was at a good weight because she fell within the healthy BMI range. Her psychologist and I had to work very hard to convince her that 120 pounds, although considered healthy by the BMI, was not healthy for her. As Beth recovered from her disorder and began to nourish her body with sufficient food and moderate activity, the scale normalized to the higher end of the BMI range. Her blood pressure and heart rate improved and her menstrual cycle reappeared. While happy that her physical health was restored, Beth still struggles with knowing that while some women at her height can be healthy at 115 pounds, in order to be healthy she needs to weigh almost 40 pounds more.

Dietitian Andrea Holwegner Health Stand Nutrition Consulting Inc. www.healthstandnutri-tion.com 403-262-3466 Twitter: @chocoholicRD

Three Steps to Achieving your Best Weight

It is not about the number on the scale

Focus on restoration of health and maximizing quality of life. Minimize a fixation on numbers on the scale as much as possible. Focus on increasing your energy levels, improving mood as well as increasing vitamins, minerals and other key nutrients. Also focus on reducing joint pain, less need for medication, better digestion, and healthier blood pressure, blood cholesterol levels and blood sugars.

It is not about calories in versus calories out

The diet industry would have you believe that you can weigh whatever you want if you simply eat less and exercise more. Your weight is a reflection of a complex list of factors above and beyond your food and activity factors. Also important are genetics, family history, gender, age, body composition, sleep habits, stress levels and more. Remember that some factors we can change while others are factors we have little control over.

It is not about giving up fun and flexibility

Weight management experts Dr. Arya Sharma and Dr. Yoni Freed-hoff suggest focusing on your best weight, which is defined as whatever weight you can achieve while living the healthiest lifestyle possible and still having fun and flexibility. At some point you will not be able to eat less, exercise more and still enjoy a great life. At that point you are trying to achieve a weight that is under where you should be. The words fun and flexibility are essential. Living fully is indeed about a mix of healthful and soulful choices.


Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/health/relying+body+mass+index+problem+those+trying+lose+weight/7306589/story.html#ixzz285PnGF1x
«13

Replies

  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    Options
    Over time Melanie found peace with her weight and success-fully now maintains a weight of 175 to 185 pounds.
    not sure what the point is here - she's still obese but has given up ? As she weighs more than me I'm guessing her body fat isn't too low.
  • Suezyq47
    Suezyq47 Posts: 199 Member
    Options
    The point is that she is still overweight but healthier and learing to accept herself even though she doesn't fit into the proper BMI category for her height and weight.
    Over time Melanie found peace with her weight and success-fully now maintains a weight of 175 to 185 pounds.
    not sure what the point is here - she's still obese but has given up ? As she weighs more than me I'm guessing her body fat isn't too low.
  • megalin9
    megalin9 Posts: 771 Member
    Options
    At 5'7", a "Healthy" BMI for me would be between something like 118 and 150lbs. I honestly feel like I would look like a skeleton at that weight. My goal is 170-175lbs, which is still considered overweight. When I reach my goal, I will reassess, but I honestly feel like I will look, feel, and actually be healthier at a higher weight range than where the BMI chart says I should be. It's not because I don't think I can reach 150. I just know my body composition. It is absolutely not about the number on the scale. It is about my fitness, health, and happiness level.
  • peuglow
    peuglow Posts: 684 Member
    Options
    BMI is the most rediculous metric one can use to measure health.
  • julieh391
    julieh391 Posts: 683 Member
    Options
    Generally, I like what this has to say. It does seem odd that she settled at "obese", but I can absolutely see someone being comfortable at a weight that is considered "overweight." At 5'7" I look sickly at 120lbs (I believe that's the low end of "healthy" for my height.) I look and feel fabulous in the 150's which are just pounds away from overweight.
  • saxmaniac
    saxmaniac Posts: 1,133 Member
    Options
    So the first lady is still overweight. Being overweight is, of course, healthier than obese, and accepting yourself should happen regardless of weight. But being normal weight is better than being overweight.

    The second one, at 5'6" shot for the far-lowest end of the BMI and on top of that - did it an extremely unhealthy way. Now, she's at the high end of normal and healthier. Go figure...

    Sounds like to me BMI is fine, how people use it is wrong.
  • pixtotts
    pixtotts Posts: 552 Member
    Options
    not sure the examples given were the best...but bmi should most definitely be taken with a pinch of salt...

    "Although BMI gives us some idea of the health risk associated with being a certain weight for your height, it's just an approximate means of assessing body fat and risk to health. It doesn't allow for weight from muscle - for example if you're an athlete or very muscular you will have a high BMI even if you have a healthy level of body fat. It's also not accurate for women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, the very young or very old, the extremes of the normal range of shape, nor does it allow for medical conditions which affect height or shape. "
  • amylovescupcakes
    amylovescupcakes Posts: 146 Member
    Options
    I'm measuring my health by my labs from the good ol' doc...and the part where my booty is just not where I want it to be. :) My BMI hates me. Not obese anymore though what what!!!
  • zaph0d
    zaph0d Posts: 1,172 Member
    Options
    TL;DR.

    BMI is a useless metric. Focus on body composition, BF%
  • zyxst
    zyxst Posts: 9,134 Member
    Options
    Uh huh.

    Tell my doctors to quit using it then.
  • dave4d
    dave4d Posts: 1,155 Member
    Options
    So the first lady is still overweight. Being overweight is, of course, healthier than obese, and accepting yourself should happen regardless of weight. But being normal weight is better than being overweight.

    The second one, at 5'6" shot for the far-lowest end of the BMI and on top of that - did it an extremely unhealthy way. Now, she's at the high end of normal and healthier. Go figure...

    Sounds like to me BMI is fine, how people use it is wrong.
    [/quote





    Many of the contenders for "Mr Universe" tip the scales at over 250 lbs. Their body fat is probably around 5 to 6 percent. By BMI standards they are considered "obese". In order for them to reach a healthy BMI they would have to lose a lot of muscle mass.

    While these are extreme cases, and they used steroids to get to the point that they are at, many people do have higher than average amounts of muscle. BMI doesn't work for them.
  • gauchogirl
    gauchogirl Posts: 467 Member
    Options
    This paragraph is golden:

    "Weight management experts Dr. Arya Sharma and Dr. Yoni Freed-hoff suggest focusing on your best weight, which is defined as whatever weight you can achieve while living the healthiest lifestyle possible and still having fun and flexibility. At some point you will not be able to eat less, exercise more and still enjoy a great life. At that point you are trying to achieve a weight that is under where you should be. The words fun and flexibility are essential. Living fully is indeed about a mix of healthful and soulful choices."
  • scagneti
    scagneti Posts: 707 Member
    Options
    I've got to say that I disagree with the point of this article -- maybe they found the wrong examples because it sounds like BMI was perfect for the 2nd girl (if she hadn't tried to get to the lowest possible healthy weight), and for the first example, other than the age -- that was me. But I didn't give up.

    I've always had big, muscular legs and big (just not muscular) arms. I just assumed that I was one of the "big boned" girls and would never get anywhere near the "healthy" BMI, so I'd critize it, saying it was a useless measuring tool.

    I'm now smack dab in the middle of healthy. Yes, it was hard work, but I've been maintaining within a 5lb +/- for a year & a half, so clearly my body is ok at this weight -- even if years ago, I'd never have believed that I'd be anywhere near "normal" BMI.

    It's amazing how much weight we keep on because we've now gotten so used to big being the average, that the "average or normal" has grown. Now if they had used athletes as examples, that would make sense as the system doesn't account for muscle, but honestly, what portion of the population does that really affect?
  • LeidaPrimal
    LeidaPrimal Posts: 198 Member
    Options
    Mirrors rule. If you have a roll where you want it flat, that beats your BF%, BMI and fat fatalism combined.
  • ARDuBaie
    ARDuBaie Posts: 379 Member
    Options
    Over time Melanie found peace with her weight and success-fully now maintains a weight of 175 to 185 pounds.
    not sure what the point is here - she's still obese but has given up ? As she weighs more than me I'm guessing her body fat isn't too low.

    The point is that any weight loss for an obese or morbidly obese person is a success and will lead to some positive changes in their health status, such as reduced knee pain, lowered cholesterol or triglycerides, etc. It is recommended that a person who is obese or morbidly obese aim for a goal of 10-20% weight loss, as this will lead to many positive health outcomes. It is much better that they loss some than none at all.

    Now, onto something you said that makes me shiver: "she's still obese but has given up..."

    This goes back to is the cup half-full or half-empty. You see Melanie's cup as being half-empty, because you fail to see what she has gained. I see her cup half-full, because I see what she has gained and that she is happy with where she is at.

    BMI is not perfect. It is not accurate for people who a large amount of muscle mass (weightlifters). Nor is it accurate for people with osteoporosis. Native Americans and black people have denser bones than Caucasians. How will they fair with a BMI scale? Would it be fair to tell a black woman that she is obese when the BMI scale cannot predict obesity accurately for black people. BMI is also inaccurate for Asians, because their bones are lighter than Caucasians. The same with people of Jewish ethnicity.

    The BMI scale doesn't look at age, race, ethnicity, or physical condition when it spits out a number telling you that you are obese. It is just a tool to be used to determine if a person is at risk for certain obesity related diseases.

    A waist-hip measurement should be done in conjunction with using a BMI scale. I know that everyone has seen people with those twigs for legs and arms, but they are tubby around the middle. They may have a BMI that is a bit above normal, but they are at risk for the same diseases as a person who is obese!

    I personally do not go by the BMI scale or the waist-hip measurement, although I know my numbers for each. I am going by how I feel and what my body fat measurement is. To me, that is what is important. To Melanie, being able to enjoy life is important. I would rather be a trifle bit overweight and enjoying life than normal by an inaccurate BMI scale (I am part Native American) and totally unhappy because I can't enjoy food because I am always fighting not to gain weight. To me, it is best to find the weight that you can maintain than to have to fight with your weight all the time, even though it may mean I will fall in the overweight zone. That doesn't make me a failure, either.
  • BusyRaeNOTBusty
    BusyRaeNOTBusty Posts: 7,166 Member
    Options
    Sure, BMI doesn't apply to all people.

    However, some people, to whom it should apply, say it doesn't apply to them and therefore don't strive to be healthy.
  • abigailmariecs
    abigailmariecs Posts: 192 Member
    Options
    I think that the two examples given could have been better but I do agree that it is not for everyone. BMI is a standardized measure that does not always work for everyone.

    I am 5'3" and 162lbs according to the CDC BMI scale I am at the high end of overweight. I told myself when I started going for a healthier lifestyle I would look at my goals again when I reached 165. Before I had my children I ranged from 160-165 and ate whatever and whenever I wanted (That being said veggies are my favorite foods and I am not big on sweets). BMI says I should be between 104-141. My main concern when I started this new lifestyle was the 8 months or so that I weighed 135lbs which according to BMI is within my healthy range. I was sick constantly, I caught every cold and flu bug within a 20 mile radius and generally had no energy.

    My decision..... If I never lose another pound I am happy with the scale. From here on out it is not about the numbers on the scale instead it is about my physical fitness. Can I run a 5k 3x a week? Do I have energy to keep up with my children? What is my strength like? Can I do 20 full pushups? Yes I still use the scale and yes, it is still in a downward trend but it is no longer about the numbers and what is an acceptable weight it is about answering and maintaining the answers to my previous questions.
  • iWaffle
    iWaffle Posts: 2,208 Member
    Options
    BMI is the most rediculous metric one can use to measure health.

    ^^ THIS. Use body fat % instead. According to the BMI chart I'm at 27 and extremely overweight even though my body fat % is under 15%.
  • leanneintexas
    Options
    A few years ago I lost a considerable amount of weight. Went from 240 to 175. I am 5'4" tall. I had a personal trainer and I trained very hard to get there with heavy kettlebells. At 175 I was wearing a size 6, had quite a bit of muscle but I was still considered obese by BMI standards. They say the ideal weight for me would be 135-140 but I could not imagine losing another 40 pounds, I would be a skeleton!
  • TyFit08
    TyFit08 Posts: 799 Member
    Options
    It is hard for those of us trying to lose weight to hear that it might not be healthy for us to achieve our goals, so I understand why not everyone supports the premise of the article. Still I think it is important for us to all realize that thin doesn't equal healthy and overweight according to BMI doesn't mean unhealthy. I was watching an episode of the Doctors and they put a thin woman and one with an overweight BMI on a treadmill. They performed a series of tests to see their fitness levels and the overweight woman was the fittest and had better cholesterol and blood pressure etc then the thinner woman.

    We all have to decide if being healthy or skinny is your goal, in some cases the two may not be one in the same.