Incremental Goals or one big one?

I set a smaller goal of 150 pounds and now that I'm there, I changed it to 140. I know a lot of people at my height (5'2") have their goal weight set to 120-ish. Last time I was in the 120's I was 16 and 2 inches shorter so that's probably not a realistic goal for me. I'm feeling it out as a go, 5 to 10 pounds at a time.

Honestly, I'm going down to a weight that I KNOW I will look decent in. 150 is still technically "overweight", if you want to look at the BMI charts. But when I actually weighed 150, I looked pretty good....if I do say so myself wink

Kidding...kind of.

Anyways. My original goal is 150, get somewhere that I feel confident. However...if I'm not happy at 150 (and I imagine I won't be), I know that I can change that and get ever lower because I've weighed 128 at one point in my life! But the main goal is getting somewhere HEALTHY. I'm just ready to be healthy again, and even though my goal is still "overweight", it's healthy enough for me as of now.

I'm with you on being happy with "Overweight" - once I drop below 240, I will no longer fall into the "Obese" Category. (judging from your picture, though, I don't think you have that issue.)

I will be VERY excited to just be categorized as "Overweight". I'm already lighter than I was when I graduated High School, but still definitely not the lightest I remember being.

Pictures can be quite deceiving, dear. While I never hit 200 (only by 10 lbs though!) I'm well into the "obese" range for my height....but I'm definitely taking the compliment! And you can't have it back!

But seriously...just have a goal in mind, big or small. Get somewhere you know you're able to, and then stop and think about it. You'll wonder, "Am I happy stopping here? Or can I go farther?" That's my plan, and I'm sticking to it. With your goal, I'd say it's very realistic...and once you get into a routine, there's a huge chance that you'll stick to it and that you'll lose even more...just because you enjoy the work out!

ETA: Sorry if saying "I never hit 200" came across as rude...it wasn't meant to be...it's just kind of how it came out. :embarassed:

I set my goals to 5 pounds at a time which ultimately add up to one big goal.
Each time that I reach 5 pounds lost, I like to reward myself with something for working hard to getting to that goal.
I find that it's much easier to concentrate a few pounds at a time than one big goal.
It's just a personal preference.

When I started I weighed 293 at 5'5". I set my original goal at 200 lbs, that would still be obese but I had to lose 93 lbs to get there...
I couldn't fathom past that, until I lost 25 lbs in 2 1/2 months. So I have now adjusted my goal to 175 lbs which will still be overweight but not obese. We will see how the next few months go and I can either leave it or readjust.

Why is every question on this site an either/or? Set both. A major goal and smaller incremental goals so you can have victories along the way.

Both. Keep your eye on the big, long term goal, but stay motivated by achieving short term goals. I lost a lot of weight five pounds at a time.

When I started MFP, I was 267pounds and the BMI charts told me that healthy for my height would be 190. I set my goal at 240 thinking that'd be a miracle in itself because that was a 27 pound weight loss and doing it in smaller goals seemed like it would be easier.

But as I read the message boards, it seems like so many of you set one major goal and work toward that instead of smaller, incremental ones. Which method is more motivating to you and why? For those of you who have tried both ways, why did you switch?

When I first started on this journey I only wanted to lose weight and get down to a size in clothing that I was when I was younger. As I progressed along I rejoiced in the "decades" of lbs lost. Then I found a workout that had me focus on circumference measurements based on the "golden ration" which I found to be a good ball park goal, and along with this was a "weight range" mainly dependent on height. This got me far beyond my original goal (which was size 8) and down to a size 2-4 because that was where I landed with the metric goals I used. It got me to a level of fitness and leanness I did not ever dream possibly especially for an over 50 year old woman.

So I would say everyone is different. But most people do well with a long term goal and break it down into increments as well, and then you goals can change as time goes on like it did for me.

Everyone is different in what motivates them. Some like to have stickers on a calender for forward calorie days, forward workout days, marking success. Others it's clothing. For me, I liked pictures of clothing I wanted to wear. I had one dress from an athletic catalog (smaller women's clothing that wouldn't have fit when I started my journey). I hung the catalog picture up for about a year, then finally got small enough to order it and it was a tremendous victory for me.

I set my initial goal to the top of my healthy weight range. Once I got there, to the middle. Now it is just to maintain between the bottom of my healthy range and 5 lbs ups.

It's totally up to you. Lots of people break down their loss into smaller increments. If that sounds easier to manage, then do it. I just had one goal, but I didn't have a huge amount (aiming for 30lbs) to lose. If I'd had 100lbs to lose, I probably would've done increments of 20 or something.

Whichever helps YOU, that's what you should do.

I have several smaller goals, it seemed like too much to me to just say I needed to lose 100lbs. So I set myself 5 mini goals that I could meet:

1. 1st Goal: 227 (25lbs Lost: 1/4 of the way)
2. 2nd Goal: 202 (50lbs Lost: half way)
3. 3rd Goal: 177 (75lbs Lost: 3/4 of the way)
4. Final Goal: 152 (100lbs Lost)
5. Fitness Goal: Run in a 5K Race

So far I've met goals 1 and 5 and am close to meeting goal 2. It's a great feeling knowing your reaching your goals, no matter what they are. Even fitting into a smaller size top or jeans is a mini goal, in fact, those are the goals I've enjoyed the most!