How many calories does photography burn?

yogeshsarkar
yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
edited January 3 in Fitness and Exercise
I am photography enthusiast and at times I am out for several hours photographing monuments and urban landscape. Since one isn’t continuously walking, putting it in walking category doesn’t feel right.

But then again one is carrying around 10-15 pounds on the back with at least one pound in hand in the form of camera, so I guess that ought to count for something, especially considering that I will be riding (motorcycle) to a camel fair around end of month and will be out shooting for at least 4 hours a day for 3 days.

So kind of curious about this.
«1

Replies

  • molly_grue
    molly_grue Posts: 215 Member
    There is a category that is "walking carrying child or 15 lb load"
    or change your activity level setting on those days.
  • ExplorinLauren
    ExplorinLauren Posts: 991 Member
    Well, I guess there is no real way to know without a HRM.

    Maybe you can log it as walking or hiking, but only use half the time you are actually out there.
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    There is a category that is "walking carrying child or 15 lb load"
    etc or change your activity level setting on those days.
    Yes saw that, but I guess that involves mostly walking, while doing photography one isn't continuously walking per say.
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    Well, I guess there is no real way to know without a HRM.

    Maybe you can log it as walking or hiking, but only use half the time you are actually out there.
    Hmm... last time I had counted the kilometers done (as per GPS) and converted that into time based on the slow walking method. But I don't know if it is actually that much or not, sadly do not have access to HRM or Calorie counters.
  • belladonna786
    belladonna786 Posts: 1,165 Member
    If this is something you do on a regular basis I wouldn't count it as exercise. Count things you do above and beyond your normal/regular activity.
  • SomeoneSomeplace
    SomeoneSomeplace Posts: 1,094 Member
    If it's something you do every day I'd say change yourself to lightly active or moderately active, whatever you feel is best, instead of logging it as exercise
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    If this is something you do on a regular basis I wouldn't count it as exercise. Count things you do above and beyond your normal/regular activity.
    If it's something you do every day I'd say change yourself to lightly active or moderately active, whatever you feel is best, instead of logging it as exercise
    I don't do it regularly (though I know I should), I do it maybe once or twice a month and usually for 2-3 hours at a stretch.
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    I don't know the answer to your question, but I'd classify this as NEAT and not worry about it at all.

    Consider it "bonus weight loss".

    =)
  • Katbody10
    Katbody10 Posts: 369 Member
    I think you may benefit from investing in either a heart rate monitor (HRM) or some kind of gadget that calculates your whole day (including sleep) calorie burn such as FitBit, BodyMedia, BodyBugg .. Those would give you the most accurate readings of what you're burning during any day .. including activities such as walking, (photography) , etc.

    Otherwise .. MFP is extremely generous in their calculations here for activities .. I know I don't burn those kind of calories they say I do, so I have to adjust it by half at least. .. I barely burn 200 calories walking at a brisk pace (3.5-4.0 mph) in an hour up steep hills and inclines in my neighborhood.. but MFP likes to give me nearly 400 calories. (wrong!) LOL

    My heart rate doesn't go up that much .. even going up inclines. I'm already in fit condition -- and don't weigh very much, so I'm not killing those calories like someone carrying 50 or more pounds in excess body weight either.

    Just be careful relying on MFP for calorie burns.. it's really off ..

    Edit:
    Oh .. you can use a gps tracking program on your phone .. I use MapMyWalk .. it's a lot more accurate than MFP values :-)
  • Shua89
    Shua89 Posts: 144 Member
    I'm also out doing photography a lot but I don't count it. I really don't see it burning nearly enough calories to count as above and beyond.
  • Car0lynnM
    Car0lynnM Posts: 332 Member
    I would change your activity level to moderately active, and use that calorie count as your goal (I am assuming you want the extra calories earned by exercising). Since this is something you do on a regular basis, it shouldn't be counted as exercise, but you do want to account for those calories used so you're getting enough fuel/nutrients. If you really want to know how many calories you're burning during that time, you can get an HRM from Amazon at a very reasonable price (mine was less than $30).
  • Kristie18
    Kristie18 Posts: 332 Member
    I don't know the answer to your question, but I'd classify this as NEAT and not worry about it at all.

    Consider it "bonus weight loss".

    =)

    Agree ^^^
  • wild_wild_life
    wild_wild_life Posts: 1,334 Member
    There are too many variables to predict the calories burned for any given outing -- your best bet would probably be to keep track of how far/fast you are walking in between stopping to shoot and just count it as walking.
  • LorinaLynn
    LorinaLynn Posts: 13,247 Member
    If you have a smartphone, use an app like runkeeper, mapmywalk, etc and set it to walk and just let it run while you're doing your activity. I had it running while I did the Zombie Walk a few weeks ago, most of which was just milling about the park waiting for the walk to start. I traveled a little over 2 miles at a 1.2mph pace and it estimated I burned about 200 calories.
  • Jorra
    Jorra Posts: 3,338 Member
    It's not necessary to log. You run the risk of overestimation for something that really isn't intentional exercise.

    For example, my weekends are much more active than my weekdays because of my job. If I changed my activity level setting for those days, I'd only get a 200 calorie boost, max.That's for being on my feet all day long doing physical activity.

    Unless your trigger finger is getting buff, I wouldn't worry about it.
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    I don't know the answer to your question, but I'd classify this as NEAT and not worry about it at all.

    Consider it "bonus weight loss".

    =)
    hehe true
    I think you may benefit from investing in either a heart rate monitor (HRM) or some kind of gadget that calculates your whole day (including sleep) calorie burn such as FitBit, BodyMedia, BodyBugg .. Those would give you the most accurate readings of what you're burning during any day .. including activities such as walking, (photography) , etc.

    Otherwise .. MFP is extremely generous in their calculations here for activities .. I know I don't burn those kind of calories they say I do, so I have to adjust it by half at least. .. I barely burn 200 calories walking at a brisk pace (3.5-4.0 mph) in an hour up steep hills and inclines in my neighborhood.. but MFP likes to give me nearly 400 calories. (wrong!) LOL

    My heart rate doesn't go up that much .. even going up inclines. I'm already in fit condition -- and don't weigh very much, so I'm not killing those calories like someone carrying 50 or more pounds in excess body weight either.

    Just be careful relying on MFP for calorie burns.. it's really off ..

    Edit:
    Oh .. you can use a gps tracking program on your phone .. I use MapMyWalk .. it's a lot more accurate than MFP values :-)
    I know, which is why I normally count food calories on a little higher side to somewhat offset it and try and not to eat up the calories I gain by exercising. guess it is just for the ego sake and I really don’t want to invest in a heart rate monitor, just for that.

    I am using My Tracks on a regular basis for logging my rides, will try MapMyWalk as well.
    I'm also out doing photography a lot but I don't count it. I really don't see it burning nearly enough calories to count as above and beyond.
    I was kind of hoping it would, since I won’t be able to work out for those 3 days and would be eating out, so watching and logging calories becomes difficult, since hotels in India don’t mention calories in food and calories can change rapidly for the same food items, depending on the cook.
    I would change your activity level to moderately active, and use that calorie count as your goal (I am assuming you want the extra calories earned by exercising). Since this is something you do on a regular basis, it shouldn't be counted as exercise, but you do want to account for those calories used so you're getting enough fuel/nutrients. If you really want to know how many calories you're burning during that time, you can get an HRM from Amazon at a very reasonable price (mine was less than $30).
    Sadly it would take a lot more to get it shipped to India, than its actual cost :(
  • I don't know the answer to your question, but I'd classify this as NEAT and not worry about it at all.

    Consider it "bonus weight loss".

    =)

    Agree ^^^


    This is 100% correct. If you are stopping often i would not count it as even walking. I don't log when i walk around the store or go check my mail. (my mailbox is about a block and a half away) That is just extra calorie burning, But not enough to count as excercising.
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    There are too many variables to predict the calories burned for any given outing -- your best bet would probably be to keep track of how far/fast you are walking in between stopping to shoot and just count it as walking.
    If you have a smartphone, use an app like runkeeper, mapmywalk, etc and set it to walk and just let it run while you're doing your activity. I had it running while I did the Zombie Walk a few weeks ago, most of which was just milling about the park waiting for the walk to start. I traveled a little over 2 miles at a 1.2mph pace and it estimated I burned about 200 calories.
    Hmm... Sounds fair, will try this app. Hopefully GPS would be able to lock in the narrow alleys of Pushkar.
    It's not necessary to log. You run the risk of overestimation for something that really isn't intentional exercise.

    For example, my weekends are much more active than my weekdays because of my job. If I changed my activity level setting for those days, I'd only get a 200 calorie boost, max.That's for being on my feet all day long doing physical activity.

    Unless your trigger finger is getting buff, I wouldn't worry about it.
    Trigger finger doesn't goes buff, but back certainly does :p
    This is 100% correct. If you are stopping often i would not count it as even walking. I don't log when i walk around the store or go check my mail. (my mailbox is about a block and a half away) That is just extra calorie burning, But not enough to count as excercising.
    hmm...
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    I'd just estimate how many minutes you walk for and divide it by 3. I'd be very reluctant to eat back calories spent on short walks. I mean, I spend about an hour a week at Tesco stopping and starting, reading labels etc, carrying shopping and wouldn't log that!
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    I'd just estimate how many minutes you walk for and divide it by 3. I'd be very reluctant to eat back calories spent on short walks. I mean, I spend about an hour a week at Tesco stopping and starting, reading labels etc, carrying shopping and wouldn't log that!
    I don't eat back calories I get by exercise, if anything I am generally less than weekly recommended calorie requirement (without counting exercise calories).
  • Personally I wouldn't count it. I only count exercise that I've done at the gym or using workout videos etc. When I go to the gym, that's a extra 15-20 minutes fast walk there and back, but I never add that 30-40 minutes of walking, even though I know I'm burning more calories.
  • basillowe66
    basillowe66 Posts: 432 Member
    If you are running from location to location, tthen maybe quite a few. if you are driving and walking
    NONE You have to get active on your non photo days and get active on this site to modify your eating habits!! Good luck!!!!!!!!!


    Basil
  • neverstray
    neverstray Posts: 3,845 Member
    I used to be a pro, meaning, I made my living from photography. When I shoot, I come home dripping wet. I don't know why. It's just the intensity of the mental exercise and the physical. But, I might be different, but I don't use tripods,a nd I am very active. I probably do 10000 squats looking for different angles and all that. Also, the next day I am really sore, like I did an iron man competition or something. I can barely move. And, I am really hungry. So, for me, I would count the activity very high in the calorie burn area. People don't understand this, but my friends that have gone with me are surprised at how difficult it is. Again, maybe it's just me. I'm kind of intense. Lol.
  • Stripycat
    Stripycat Posts: 58 Member
    I shoot weddings, and a minimum of 3 hours on your feet, occasionally fixed in position, but other times running, walking, crouching, crawling, holding odd positions to get the right angle, with all your kit on your back really takes it out of you. I found a rating for fishing from the riverbank (or something similar) and I use that.
  • EnchantedEvening
    EnchantedEvening Posts: 671 Member
    While walking around with camera equipment for several hours per day is a lot of work, it's hard to know how much aerobic exercise you're getting.

    What I mean is, I don't count something as "exercise" on MFP unless my heart rate gets up around 130-140. Anything else, like a walk through the mall with a friend, cleaning the house (sweeping, dusting, easy things like that), grocery shopping, and so on - I just consider that bonus exercise and don't log it. While I'm active, and that's great for my body, it's not aerobic exercise that's going to give me a burn. Yes, I'm burning a few more calories, but not enough that I'd want to count them.

    Does that help?

    If you still want to log it, I would use the "carrying child" or "light backpack" setting and put down 1-2 hours at a slow pace.

    I just read the other posters. I didn't realize you might be crouching and squatting too. I would definitely count that if you're running around like a wedding photographer. Wedding photographers are ACTIVE. :)
  • Jorra
    Jorra Posts: 3,338 Member
    I'd just estimate how many minutes you walk for and divide it by 3. I'd be very reluctant to eat back calories spent on short walks. I mean, I spend about an hour a week at Tesco stopping and starting, reading labels etc, carrying shopping and wouldn't log that!
    I don't eat back calories I get by exercise, if anything I am generally less than weekly recommended calorie requirement (without counting exercise calories).

    If you don't eat exercise calories, what does it matter how much you burn?
  • GuybrushThreepw00d
    GuybrushThreepw00d Posts: 784 Member
    I'd just estimate how many minutes you walk for and divide it by 3. I'd be very reluctant to eat back calories spent on short walks. I mean, I spend about an hour a week at Tesco stopping and starting, reading labels etc, carrying shopping and wouldn't log that!
    I don't eat back calories I get by exercise, if anything I am generally less than weekly recommended calorie requirement (without counting exercise calories).

    If you don't eat exercise calories, what does it matter how much you burn?

    Yeah, I was wondering this.... It make a no sense.
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    If you are running from location to location, tthen maybe quite a few. if you are driving and walking
    NONE You have to get active on your non photo days and get active on this site to modify your eating habits!! Good luck!!!!!!!!!


    Basil
    Driving, no. But the last time I was there, I was walking at least 4-5 miles each day. I know it’s not much, but it seems like a lot to a guy like me who works from home :p
    I used to be a pro, meaning, I made my living from photography. When I shoot, I come home dripping wet. I don't know why. It's just the intensity of the mental exercise and the physical. But, I might be different, but I don't use tripods,a nd I am very active. I probably do 10000 squats looking for different angles and all that. Also, the next day I am really sore, like I did an iron man competition or something. I can barely move. And, I am really hungry. So, for me, I would count the activity very high in the calorie burn area. People don't understand this, but my friends that have gone with me are surprised at how difficult it is. Again, maybe it's just me. I'm kind of intense. Lol.
    I definitely don’t squat all that much, but do get tired a lot, but I guess that is mostly due to the fact that I am out of shape :p. I don’t use tripod all that much, unless I am shooting in the morning or at night, especially since almost all monuments here prohibit its usage, unless you get written permission from the Archeological Survey of India.
    I shoot weddings, and a minimum of 3 hours on your feet, occasionally fixed in position, but other times running, walking, crouching, crawling, holding odd positions to get the right angle, with all your kit on your back really takes it out of you. I found a rating for fishing from the riverbank (or something similar) and I use that.
    Hmm… will check that out, thanks.
    While walking around with camera equipment for several hours per day is a lot of work, it's hard to know how much aerobic exercise you're getting.

    What I mean is, I don't count something as "exercise" on MFP unless my heart rate gets up around 130-140. Anything else, like a walk through the mall with a friend, cleaning the house (sweeping, dusting, easy things like that), grocery shopping, and so on - I just consider that bonus exercise and don't log it. While I'm active, and that's great for my body, it's not aerobic exercise that's going to give me a burn. Yes, I'm burning a few more calories, but not enough that I'd want to count them.

    Does that help?

    If you still want to log it, I would use the "carrying child" or "light backpack" setting and put down 1-2 hours at a slow pace.

    I just read the other posters. I didn't realize you might be crouching and squatting too. I would definitely count that if you're running around like a wedding photographer. Wedding photographers are ACTIVE. :)
    Nowhere near as active as wedding photographers and I don’t think people would continue behaving as they normally do (essential for street photography), if they saw a 280 pound guy running in their direction with a camera in his hand :D
    If you don't eat exercise calories, what does it matter how much you burn?
    Just for the feel good factor, since like I said, in case of this trip that is coming up (and hopefully a few more in coming months), I wouldn’t be able to work out.
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    If you don't eat them back, then log them as 1 if you insist on logging something.

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/exercise/diary/darrensurrey
  • yogeshsarkar
    yogeshsarkar Posts: 119 Member
    If you don't eat them back, then log them as 1 if you insist on logging something.
    hmm.. guess weighing scale after the trip would be a better indication of things, though I do lose a lot of water on my rides as well, so don't know how accurate it would be.
This discussion has been closed.