Runtastic, calorie counts

lilac_meddow
lilac_meddow Posts: 22
edited January 5 in Fitness and Exercise
Hey all. I was using Runkeeper before MFP decided to add apps that will sync with their program. I think it's awesome that they did this. But I've noticed that in Runtastic the calorie counts are WAYYY lower. So today I used both... the same run/walk of 3 miles in 41minutes was 314 on Runkeeper and only 184 with Runtastic.

Any Fitness equipment I've ever used has always averaged about 100 cals a mile for both running and walking so this seemed to be a bit off for me.

Has anyone else experienced this? Maybe I have a setting wrong. Any insight Appreciated

PS- regardless of how it's counted... it's still better than sitting my happy butt on the couch :-P

Replies

  • DanaDark
    DanaDark Posts: 2,187 Member
    Almost everything I use says wildly different things. It is very difficult to know. Best bet is use the smallest number to be safe.
  • I find that too but normally there's just a small difference... and I'll take the smallest in that case.... but this time it was almost half of what the norm would have been..... I just thought it was strange. And I still wish they would sync up run keeper.... I have a bunch of friends who use it and I have fitness goals set on there that I'd like to be keeping track of :-D
  • pasturepilot
    pasturepilot Posts: 23 Member
    I use Endomondo, its numbers seem to average well with other sources. Just a note - is your weight properly input for the app with the low calorie counts? If it thinks you weigh 80 lbs or something wonky, that would do it too...
This discussion has been closed.