We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Solving a friendly disagreement

monarols
monarols Posts: 8
edited January 6 in Fitness and Exercise
I was having a friendly disagreement with a 'bikie" friend the other day, and we were talking about calorie expenditure during activity. I said I currently walk to work (4km) at around 6km/hr and he said I should cycle it, as it would burn up more calories. My walk takes around 39 mins, and if i cycled it would take around 15mins.

I maintained that because walking is a weight bearing exercise, and of a longer duration, the caloric expenditure would be greater. He disagrees.

I don't have a HR monitor, but judging by my breathing rate, I'd estimate my HR increases to around 50% greater than resting.

Soooo...which activity would expend the most calories for me (100kg/175cm)?

Replies

  • flechero
    flechero Posts: 260 Member
    I would 'guess' you burn 3 times as much walking it.... especially if you walk at a good pace. 6km on a bike is not a workout unless you are pulling something. I think 15 min would be at a leisurely pace also.
  • angelicasmommy
    angelicasmommy Posts: 303 Member
    I would 'guess' you burn 3 times as much walking it.... especially if you walk at a good pace. 6km on a bike is not a workout unless you are pulling something. I think 15 min would be at a leisurely pace also.

    My thoughts exactly. If I walk to work, it takes about 25 mins. If I bike, it takes about 7 mins and I get a good workout on the few hills on the way there but other than that it's all downhill or level so it's pretty easy.
    I would think it would only be better to bike if it was all up hill.
  • AussieTrainer
    AussieTrainer Posts: 171
    the one that you enjoy more and thus will do more of!

    If you walk fast you can take a slightly longer route, and that would burn more.... and if you bike you can take an even longer detour, and that would burn more as well.

    I think your friend may just be trying to push your buttons. :P
  • wellbert
    wellbert Posts: 3,924 Member
    All else being equal, walking burns more in 40 minutes than flat road cycling does in 15.
  • DavPul
    DavPul Posts: 61,406 Member
    walking
  • monarols
    monarols Posts: 8
    Thanks all...Thought so.
  • jofjltncb6
    jofjltncb6 Posts: 34,415 Member
    This one is simply: is a bike more or less efficient than walking? Obviously, more efficient, so walking burns more calories for an identical route.


    Edit: because proper punctuation matters.
  • n0ob
    n0ob Posts: 2,390 Member
    But, does biking put you ahead because you get there faster and are burning extra calories during the same time that you would have spent walking?
  • wellbert
    wellbert Posts: 3,924 Member
    of course you could do a long bicycle route for 30 minutes, and burn the most calories.
  • marinegirl92
    marinegirl92 Posts: 184 Member
    Sorry... can't help myself... or you could walk to work pushing your bike - way more calories :) sorry... great thread! :)
This discussion has been closed.

Categories