Kate Middleton official portrait -- YIKES!
I don't normally follow things like this, but a news station I follow posted it on Facebook and I was kind of horrified. I wonder who approved this as the "official" portrait and if that person was blind.
It looks like someone took a photo of this beautiful woman and ran it through one of those programs that ages the photo:
It looks like someone took a photo of this beautiful woman and ran it through one of those programs that ages the photo:
0
Replies
-
She looks 60. I guess they aren't expecting her to age well.0
-
I actually think if she were actually 60, she would look pretty good. But she's not 60 and she doesn't look anything like that now! It's awful, awful, awful.She looks 60. I guess they aren't expecting her to age well.0 -
She looks 60. I guess they aren't expecting her to age well.
If she looks like that at 60, congratulations to her!0 -
I was reading about this just a few mins ago. The family said they wanted the real her. Not the "official her" thats seen in the media all the time. Not saying this is it, but they were going for a more untouched, unedited.0
-
Such a beautiful woman, but she looks sedated! I gotta feel a bit bad for Kate - she has to be polite about the results0
-
Was she edited and touched up in the live broadcast of the wedding? She didn't look 60 there.I was reading about this just a few mins ago. The family said they wanted the real her. Not the "official her" thats seen in the media all the time. Not saying this is it, but they were going for a more untouched, unedited.
She just looks so old in this portrait.0 -
Was she edited and touched up in the live broadcast of the wedding? She didn't look 60 there.I was reading about this just a few mins ago. The family said they wanted the real her. Not the "official her" thats seen in the media all the time. Not saying this is it, but they were going for a more untouched, unedited.
She just looks so old in this portrait.
She was definitely poked, and pinched, strapped, and slathered in makeup..0 -
Eeek! What a terrible photograph!0
-
Yes, but it's not like she isn't wearing makeup or her hair isn't done or eyebrows waxed, etc., in that photo (or is it a painting?).
Was she edited and touched up in the live broadcast of the wedding? She didn't look 60 there.I was reading about this just a few mins ago. The family said they wanted the real her. Not the "official her" thats seen in the media all the time. Not saying this is it, but they were going for a more untouched, unedited.
She just looks so old in this portrait.
She was definitely poked, and pinched, strapped, and slathered in makeup..0 -
David Icke claimed the royals were lizards from outer space (Google it for a laugh). This picture is proof LOL0
-
But she's a commoner! (Or she was, anyway.)David Icke claimed the royals were lizards from outer space (Google it for a laugh). This picture is proof LOL
lol0 -
But she's a commoner! (Or she was, anyway.)David Icke claimed the royals were lizards from outer space (Google it for a laugh). This picture is proof LOL
lol
Ok then... part lizard from another generation/dimension? lol (I'm trying to think what Icke would say about this lol)
In all seriousness, as much as I dislike the royals, I do think she's a good looking gal. Dare I say it, they've royally screwed up this portrait.0 -
Are you sure this isn't an advertisement on the side effects of Meth?0
-
That would make absolute sense.Are you sure this isn't an advertisement on the side effects of Meth?0 -
That cannot be real.0
-
^This.Are you sure this isn't an advertisement on the side effects of Meth?
I didn't realize "natural" meant adding premature wrinkles to someone's face.0 -
Yikes...0
-
Even famous people get bad driver's license pictures. Seems fair. Have you seen celebrity mug shots? Always awful. BTW It probably looks like *kitten* to us because all the pictures in the magazines are photoshopped.0
-
Well she is a few years older than William. But I do think that this photo was age-progressed.0
-
She'll grow into it.0
-
They had to release an ugly photo to offset all the topless ones floating around.
The royal family is absurd.0 -
She looks devoid of life. The eyes have no sparkle or light to them.
And also, the pursed lips do not help. It looks forced/unnatural/posed.
I don't usually follow them either but this just does not do her justice. Poor girl.0 -
HOLY CRAP!
This is the guy who painted it too!
0 -
HOLY CRAP!
This is the guy who painted it too!
Oh... it's a painting... that explains a lot!0 -
This is an oficial portrait that probably cost quite a lot of money and will be around forever. It's not a mug shot or driver's license.Even famous people get bad driver's license pictures. Seems fair. Have you seen celebrity mug shots? Always awful. BTW It probably looks like *kitten* to us because all the pictures in the magazines are photoshopped.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Yeah in 20 years it will look just like her.She'll grow into it.0 -
Kate Middleton - I'd hit it. But I wouldn't hit THAT!0
-
oh poor Kate! this is TERRIBLE! the only thing i can think of that would POSSIBLY explain this is if her sittings were when she was first so sick w/ her morning sickness and they weren't telling anyone she was pregnant. she looks ill in the painting. and she can't SAY anything. poor Kate!!!0
-
They should fire that painter! She looks so old.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions