Do you eat your exercise calories?

That is a really good question. I am also interested to hear what you all do.

For me, it depends on the exercise, if it is one of the weight lifing days, then i definatly do since i am usually starving after burning all of those calories. If I just do cardio or go for a walk, i don't.

When I first started MFP, I did not eat my exercise calories......and I didnt lose much. But now I eat most of them, atleast half sometimes more depending on my workout. Once I started eating the extra I started losing, but it took a few weeks for my body to adjust to the extra food. (just make sure the extra is healthy protein/veggies.)
Good luck!

Nope, I never eat my exercise calories. I have a hard enough time just eating my regular calories, I cant imagine trying to add the rest

I don't. When I first started using MFP I didn't, but I kept hearing from everyone here that I should and it's bad for my body if I don't, so I started to eat the exercise calories. As soon as I started doing that my weight went up - a lot and really quickly. I spoke to my doctor and he told me to go back to what I was doing before. I just eat my normal calories, if I go over every once in a while I don't beat myself up about but I don't eat them on a regular basis.

I tend not to use my exercise calories, I know it can only help with weight loss. I listen to my body and eat when I'm hungry. If on an exercise day I get headaches, I know it's probably because my sugar is low, then I eat some of my exercise calories. And then everyone once in a while on the weekends I'll use this them all up, particularly if I am going out to the bar. So far it's been working pretty well, so I'm going to continue doing what I'm doing

When you starve yourself, thats when weight loss becomes difficult. Youre body goes into storage mode instead of calorie burning mode. If you're excercising and not compensating be eating more, then you will have trouble loosing weight.. . not to mention be crabby from being hungry. So I tend to eat more when I work out, but I definitely don't try to eat as many calories as I burned.

If I am hungry, I will eat some of them but never all. It has worked for me

I don't now...but only because I'm better off NOT entering them here at MFP. It just gets confusing and varies with my exercise (which I'm not even 100% sure that's actually accurate on a calories burned basis and doesn't take into account cals burned during anaerobic weightlifting, but I digress!) and I like this formula better. My mathy brain likes to know why the numbers are what they are!

I use the Harris-Benedict equation:

BMR = 655 + ( 4.35 x weight in pounds ) + ( 4.7 x height in inches ) - ( 4.7 x age in years )
BMR = 655 + (4.35 x 139) + (4.7 x 60) - (4.7 x 26)
BMR = 655 + 604.65 + 282 - 122.2
BMR = 1419.05

Activity multipliers - factoring in lifestyle and workouts
Little to sedentary = 1.2
Light (1-3 workouts / wk) = 1.375
Moderate (3-5 workouts / wk) = 1.55
Heavy (6-7 workouts / wk) = 1.725
Very Heavy (i.e. crayzay) = 1.9

So, take the BMR calc and multiply it by your multiplier of choice:

1419.05 x 1.55 = 2199.53 (needed to maintain my body at my current weight)

Now for the weight loss part, factoring in a deficit...
3500 calorie deficit per week = 1 pound expected loss per week

Per day, that's a 500 calorie deficit (average)

So, based on that, my calorie goal per day, factoring in activity is:

2199.53 - 500 = 1699 calories/day to lose 1 pound weekly

I believe I rounded mine down to a 1650/day calorie goal. Some days I go above, some days under. What I'm REALLY looking for is that 3500 calories/week deficit.

Typical recommended deficits SHOULD NOT exceed 1000/calories per day unless otherwise advised by a doctor.

Exercise is good for you; never use it to punish youself for eating too much or to earn the right to eat more!

Food should be to satisfy hunger!

bump

Didn't eat them for my first 4.5 months here. Lost a bunch of weight (had a bunch to lose). Then I slammed full force into a wall and actually GAINED weight for a few weeks. I'm pretty sure this was the notorious "survival mode." I slowly started increasing what I ate and I'm up to eating 90-100% of them now. Each time I increase what I eat, I start losing weight again. Then hit another wall until I increase my calorie intake again. It's happened too many times (3 now) to really be a coincidence.

So, yes, I've discovered that now I have to eat my exercise calories (which puts me eating 1500-1900 calories most days) because otherwise, at this point, I won't lose weight if my calorie deficit is too big.

Another thing to keep in mind and ask yourself is - and this might explain part of why it works with some people but not with others - how often are you exercising and to what extent? Someone who does not eat their cals might be burning 200-300 extra cals a couple times a week and maybe going over their cals on a couple of the days they are not exercising. They also might be set to a higher calorie intake to start with and can afford a higher deficit. You're body won't go into "starvation mode" if it is not a regular major deficit (though i admit, i don't know the science behind how often or how long is considered "regularly"). But if you are working out 600 or more calories a day and under eating 4 5 6 times a week it will affect you negatively. If you are doing this and you are losing weight, it is going to backfire on you. If you are burning 200-400 cals 2-3 times a week and maybe having a cheat day on the weekend - you're probably OK overall. (especially if you are not accounting for the calories already in your plan - if you burn 300 cals, you really only burned about 200 EXTRA over what you already have accounted for - if you eat all 300, you are overeating...) A lot of the "eat your calorie" debate has to do with patterns and your body predicting what is coming next - when it is predicting deficits, that is when you are in trouble.

I dont eat all mine but I always try to make sure I eat at least 1200 calories a day. I'll just repeat what a few others have said...If Im hungry I eat if Im not then I dont eat.

I personally do not eat all (or even most) of my exercise calories, but then again, I have a lot to lose.

If I'm hungry, I'll eat something healthy. I wont eat just for the sake of eating unless I'm way low on calories for the day, but usually I try and plan better than that. On a non exercise day, I'll try and keep it under 1600. On a day where I go to the gym, I'll burn about 1500 calories, so I might eat anywhere between 1600 and 2000. At a bare minimum, I'll make sure to at least eat as many calories as I expended from exercise.

There is actually a formula for determining your maximum calorie deficit for fat loss:
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/lyle_mcdonald/maximum_fatloss

Basically, it's 31calories per day for every pound of fat you have. That is the maximum rate at which the body can convert fat stores to energy. So, if you know your body fat percentage, you can calculate how much that fat weighs, and multiply that by 31. That is the maximum calorie deficit you can have without the body consuming lean body mass as an energy source.

Body Fat% * Body Weight * 31

So for me, I could in theory run a deficit of just over 3500 calories a day without sacrificing LBM. Considering that number is much higher than my actual RMR though, I'm nowhere near that kind of deficit.

As I'm losing body fat though, that maximum deficit is decreasing, which is why it's so much easier to lose weight in the beginning, and why the last few pounds are so hard to lose.

I just did 164 times the 31 you said and it gave me 5084 since math was my worst subject can you please tell me the rest lol

I just did 164 times the 31 you said and it gave me 5084 since math was my worst subject can you please tell me the rest lol

I'm assuming 164 is your total body weight?

To figure it out you would need some estimation of your body fat percentage as well.

Assuming your body fat percentage was 25% (just tossing out numbers here) and your weight was 164lb:

0.25 * 164 * 31 = 1271 calories.

Keep in mind ... this is just a theoretical maximum, and not necessarily something you should strive for.