question about HRM

hi all ,,

i want to ask about logging in the calories burned using a heart rate monitar , i'm using a polar one and when i compare the calories i burned doing an exercise to the mfp database i find that it's not the same , i know it's only estimated in here but i also heard that HRMs are not that accurate too , so should i log what it says in mfp or what's on my hrm ?

Replies

  • TheChangingMan
    TheChangingMan Posts: 73 Member
    Neither is spot on but the HRM is *more* accurate as it is more personalised.
  • xsmilexforxmex
    xsmilexforxmex Posts: 1,216 Member
    HRM takes your personal level of fitness based on your heart rate into account... MFP only uses weight and age.. the HRM is usually more accurate.
  • sarrora
    sarrora Posts: 37 Member
    thank you ^_^
  • lenniebus
    lenniebus Posts: 321 Member
    I take my HRM--it is lower than the MFP but seems more accurate to me--maybe not spot on but closer.
  • I have a HRM and I log what it says. I am normally pushing a toddler in a jogging stroller when I am walking or jogging and I usually burn close to 100 calories more than what MFP says because MFP isn't taking into account the weight I am pushing as I am exercising.
  • I log my HRM calories burned. I use it while on the machines at the gym and it is very close, a little lower, so I trust my HRM. I do a lot outside of the gym, so I need it for tracking.
  • momamilkmartin
    momamilkmartin Posts: 6 Member
    Could anyone suggest a HRM?? I had one but it quit and it was just a cheap one from walmart, I would like one that will last plus be accurate and not extremly expensive.

    Thanks for any help.
  • Mokey41
    Mokey41 Posts: 5,769 Member
    A Polar FT4 is a good model if you want a basic monitor with a chest strap.

    For logging I'd go with the HRM. If you want to get more accurate you can deduct your BMR calories for the time that you were working out.