PSA: BMI Categories

Options
245

Replies

  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    Options
    30.1 What are you calling me obese!! :sad: :sad:

    On another note, the BMI is averaged over a large group of people and should not generally be used for an individual as your muscle mass and bone structure could be above or below average.
  • stumblinthrulife
    stumblinthrulife Posts: 2,558 Member
    Options
    30.1 What are you calling me obese!! :sad: :sad:

    On another note, the BMI is averaged over a large group of people and should not generally be used for an individual as your muscle mass and bone structure could be above or below average.

    This is an important point. Even when I nudge under that magic 25 number, my body fat will still class me as abdominal obese, unless I miraculously lose two inches off my waist in the next week.
  • whierd
    whierd Posts: 14,025 Member
    Options
    30.1 What are you calling me obese!! :sad: :sad:

    On another note, the BMI is averaged over a large group of people and should not generally be used for an individual as your muscle mass and bone structure could be above or below average.

    You mean that my BMI doesnt make me one of the fattest people on the planet?!?!
  • BusyRaeNOTBusty
    BusyRaeNOTBusty Posts: 7,166 Member
    Options

    P.S, I notice that I've recently tipped into the Overweight category. I'll consider it a NSV!

    Congratulations. :smile:

    Anyone who wants to call themselves a power lifter, or bodybuilder would probably rather be in the overweight, or the obese category on the BMI scale.

    Maybe not for women. I'm pretty heavy for a woman and still within healthy BMI.
  • SmartAlec03211988
    SmartAlec03211988 Posts: 1,896 Member
    Options
    25.0 exactly.

    At my goal weight I'll be 24.4.
  • neandermagnon
    neandermagnon Posts: 7,436 Member
    Options
    25.1

    So. Damn. Close. I. Can. Taste. It.

    24.9 BMI - 22% body fat

    So. Damn. Close. I. Can. Taste. It.

    (ultimate long term goal: overweight BMI with 20% or less body fat)
  • sz8soon
    sz8soon Posts: 816 Member
    Options
    This is incredibly divisive. No one needs to conform to your way of thinking... oh wait. :blushing:

    I'm fat. obese, stout, overweight, heavy, plump, rotund, corpulent, portly, well-fed, chubby, podgy or pudgy, roly-poly, tubby, bulky, fleshy, paunchy, pot-bellied, overfed, flabby, elephantine, broad in the beam, beamy, beefy...

    Thing is-- I didn't need a BMI table, a mirror or a scale to tell me this and I don't need it to define me. I can't hide it, it's who I am- no sense in denying it. I'm here to get muscles, fit, lean, buff, built, stacked, whatever you want to call it. Imma gonna be a healthy bish, instead of a fat one when I'm done.
  • taylor0204
    taylor0204 Posts: 357 Member
    Options
    Mine is 25.7 ......so that makes me part normal and close to overweight.....I need to drop the .7
  • NobodyInParticular
    NobodyInParticular Posts: 352 Member
    Options
    25.4 Like a boss
  • etoiles_argentees
    etoiles_argentees Posts: 2,827 Member
    Options
    BMI is useless when determining what's attractive in an individual. BMI is for tracking a large population to determine where the $ go. We've done this. bmi-s-inacuracy-leads-to-the-epidemias-s-underesti?hl=BMI+determines%23posts-7811663">http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/555058-obesity-bmi-s-inacuracy-leads-to-the-epidemias-s-underesti?hl=BMI+determines#posts-7811663


    Who Was Behind the Redefinition of "Obese"

    In 1997 a front-page exposé in the Newark Star-Ledger noted:
    "Eight of the nine members of the National Institutes of Health task force on prevention and treatment of obesity have ties to the weight-loss industry, either as consultants to pharmaceutical companies, recipients of research money from them, or advisers to for-profit groups such as Weight Watchers."

    Case Western Reserve University professor Paul Ernsberger describes how financially conflicted researchers control the government’s pronouncements on obesity:

    "Medical beliefs about obesity are shaped by expert panels that are highly selective in the data they consider. Experts included on government consensus panels have been disproportionately drawn from the ranks of diet clinic directors, which might explain the congruence between panel recommendations and the economic interests of the diet industry. In short, economic factors encourage a systematic exaggeration of the health risks of obesity."

    Many of America’s most influential obesity experts receive significant financial support from the $46 billion weight-loss industry. These experts help drive obesity hype by churning out a steady stream of studies, alarmist public pronouncements, and treatment guidelines.

    The notion that 65 percent of Americans are overweight or obese derives in part from a 1998 decision to redefine "overweight," which cast more than 35 million Americans into that category. This decision was made by a National Institutes of Health obesity panel chaired by Xavier Pi-Sunyer, one of the most influential obesity researchers in the country.

    Over the years, Pi-Sunyer has received support from virtually every leading weight-loss company, including Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Ortho-McNeil, Wyeth-Ayerst, Knoll, Weight Watchers, and Roche. He has served on the advisory boards of Wyeth-Ayerst, Knoll, Abbott, Johnson & Johnson, and McNeil Nutritionals. He once headed up the Weight Watchers Foundation and is currently a board member of that organization. Pi-Sunyer gave the "obesity overview" presentation on behalf of Knoll, maker of the weight-loss drug Meridia, at a 1996 FDA advisory panel hearing on the drug. He has also been paid to sign his name to ghost-written journal articles used to promote the dangerous weight-loss combination known as "fen-phen."

    Xavier Pi-Sunyer is an advisory council member of the American Obesity Association, which is best described as the lobbying arm of the weight-loss industry and is examined in greater detail later in this report. He is the former president of the pharmaceutical industry–funded North American Association for the Study of Obesity (NAASO is also examined later in this report) and heads a NAASO-affiliated research institute that is also supported by the weight-loss industry. He has influenced international obesity policy through his membership in the pharmaceutical industry– funded International Obesity Task Force, which plays a key role in determining policy for the World Health Organization.

    Pi-Sunyer has chaired the National Institutes of Health Task Force on the Treatment of Obesity since 1995, when he also led the industry-funded NAASO. In 1998, when his NIH panel redefined the official standard for "overweight," he served as editor of NAASO’s journal, Obesity Research.

    In addition to Pi-Sunyer, the 1998 NIH panel included a number of other financially conflicted researchers, such as Claude Bouchard, Graham Colditz, and Shiriki Kumanyika, each of whom is profiled later in this report.

    The decision to redefine "overweight" was a big boost to the diet drug industry. In April 2005 The New York Times reported: "[M]any drug industry analysts see a potentially even bigger market if such a drug also catches on among the more than 60 percent of adults in this country who are statistically overweight, those with a body mass index of 25 or more."

    The weight-loss industry appears to appreciate the flawed BMI standard. In 2001, Roche, maker of the weight-loss pill Xenical, promised a donation to NAASO for every individual screened during "BMI Awareness Week." In 2005, the American Cancer Society ran an event called the "Great American Weigh In" at Weight Watchers.
  • Admiral_Derp
    Admiral_Derp Posts: 866 Member
    Options
    Stupid index.
    *pouting*
    tumblr_mfmvr1wlhl1qeybcbo1_250.gif
  • diodelcibo
    diodelcibo Posts: 2,564 Member
    Options
    Brb am severely obese...
  • taso42
    taso42 Posts: 8,980 Member
    Options
    Brb am severely obese...

    #WINNING :drinker:
  • stetienne
    stetienne Posts: 560 Member
    Options
    22.9 :)
  • BinaryPulsar
    BinaryPulsar Posts: 8,927 Member
    Options
    On another note, the BMI is averaged over a large group of people and should not generally be used for an individual as your muscle mass and bone structure could be above or below average.

    This is true. What is a healthy weight for each individual has a lot more variance on that scale than height alone (as the Op noted about his own weight). I used a BMI calculator that took small bone structure into consideration (it worked for me because I have a small bone structure) and my BMI went up by .6 points. I found that interesting and it made a lot of sense to me in terms of how I look. I am on the low end of the normal weight (still normal, occasionally drop below by 1 pound), but I look great, healthy and defined muscles, nice figure (my husband and I are happy anyway). I also feel great and am very active. Just saw my doctor again today and she said I am very healthy. I also eat great. This was probably more info than anyone was wanting me to share...hehe. :wink:
  • Jonesie1984
    Jonesie1984 Posts: 612 Member
    Options
    Brb am severely obese...

    me likey obese
  • Bolthouse26
    Bolthouse26 Posts: 70 Member
    Options
    21.1 hurray :) right in the middle of healthy range ..
  • Yanicka1
    Yanicka1 Posts: 4,564 Member
    Options
    I am at 24.6


    Normal but almost overweight.......and damn proud because I wear a size 4 and worked hard for those pounds of muscles
  • NZhellkat
    NZhellkat Posts: 355 Member
    Options
    I have a BMI of 33.5 with BF of 26.83%. I'm okay with that cause I have a lot of muscle and heavy bone due to genetics.
  • quirkytizzy
    quirkytizzy Posts: 4,052 Member
    Options
    I am half a point from being on the high end of normal. ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED!

    That said, I am surprised, now that I calculated it, to find that I was swimming right next to obese beforehand. Huh. Did not know that.