Do you think people are lacking 'class'?

124

Replies

  • treetop57
    treetop57 Posts: 1,578 Member
    People have been whining about how awful the younger generation is since at least Roman times.

    In many ways, society today is a lot better than the 50s that people remember through the gauzy golden haze of nostalgia. But for anybody but middle- and upper-class straight white men, things have definitely gotten better in the last half a century.

    I recently read "The Better Angels of Our Nature," which examines in detail how much less violent and "civilized" our society is today than at any time in history: less war, less interpersonal violence, less violence against children and animals. If we have to lose some snob's idea of "class" to make a fairer and less violent society, so be it.

    "Better Angel's of Our Nature: Why Violence has Declined," by Steven Pinker.

    http://www.amazon.com/Better-Angels-Our-Nature-Violence/dp/0670022950/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1329496361&sr=1-1

    From a review:
    The final trend Pinker discusses is the “rights revolution,” the revulsion against violence inflicted on ethnic minorities, women, children, homosexuals and animals that has developed over the past half-century. Pinker is not, of course, arguing that these movements have achieved their goals, but he reminds us how far we have come in a relatively short time from the days when lynchings were commonplace in the South; domestic violence was tolerated to such a degree that a 1950s ad could show a husband with his wife over his knees, spanking her for failing to buy the right brand of coffee. . . .

    "http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/books/review/the-better-angels-of-our-nature-by-steven-pinker-book-review.html?pagewanted=all"
  • ItsCasey
    ItsCasey Posts: 4,021 Member
    The original question was not about violence or general standard of living, so I'm not sure why people keep bringing that up.

    I'm also failry certain that the OP was not using the word "class" in a socio-economic context, i.e. upper, middle, lower, etc.. She was asking why being rude to each other seems to be acceptable in today's society (the words "hostile" and "angry" being used to describe those who flip people off while sitting in traffic or cursing in front of little kids at hockey games). So "class," in that sense, refers to a person's standard of behavior with regard to how he or she treats other people, not to that person's standing within society.

    And here's where it blows my mind that anyone thinks "people haven't changed." Things that used to be considered completely unacceptable at all but the absolute lowest levels of society (like men cursing in front of women and kids or people wearing pajamas to the grocery store) are now commonplace at all levels of society. People HAVE changed. Nobody has any respect for anyone anymore. And as much as people rationalize their behavior under a banner of "Live, and let live," it's all a load of garbage. When a dad can't take his son or daughter to a baseball game without having to request that some inconsiderate moron behind him watch his language, it's gone way beyond minding your own business.

    Civilized society requires that you take other people into consideration when you are anywhere but alone in your own home. There is nothing "civilized" about going out and mixing with other people with the attitude that you can do absolutely whatever you want and that everyone else should just leave you alone. That is the OPPOSITE of civilization. See Kant's Categorial Imperative.
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,716 Member
    The original question was not about violence or general standard of living, so I'm not sure why people keep bringing that up.

    I'm also failry certain that the OP was not using the word "class" in a socio-economic context, i.e. upper, middle, lower, etc.. She was asking why being rude to each other seems to be acceptable in today's society (the words "hostile" and "angry" being used to describe those who flip people off while sitting in traffic or cursing in front of little kids at hockey games). So "class," in that sense, refers to a person's standard of behavior with regard to how he or she treats other people, not to that person's standing within society.

    And here's where it blows my mind that anyone thinks "people haven't changed." Things that used to be considered completely unacceptable at all but the absolute lowest levels of society (like men cursing in front of women and kids or people wearing pajamas to the grocery store) are now commonplace at all levels of society. People HAVE changed. Nobody has any respect for anyone anymore. And as much as people rationalize their behavior under a banner of "Live, and let live," it's all a load of garbage. When a dad can't take his son or daughter to a baseball game without having to request that some inconsiderate moron behind him watch his language, it's gone way beyond minding your own business.

    Civilized society requires that you take other people into consideration when you are anywhere but alone in your own home. There is nothing "civilized" about going out and mixing with other people with the attitude that you can do absolutely whatever you want and that everyone else should just leave you alone. That is the OPPOSITE of civilization. See Kant's Categorial Imperative.

    You completely leave out the reality of the situation. Maybe in the "good old days" (no such thing) men tipped their hats to a lady on the street. But they also had no qualms against organizing a neighborhood lynching should a black family try to move in. Maybe the idea of the old fashioned Donna Reed style housewife appeals to you. Well the reality is an awful lot of those housewives would catch a smack if dinner wasn't ready on time and there wasn't a thing they could do about it.

    You said earlier to ask someone who lived in the 50's how much better things were. I agree. But don't limit yourself to asking middle class white males. Ask a black woman how great the 50's were. Or a gay man. I'm sure they'll have loads of stories about how much "class" people had.

    Maybe it's true that today people are quicker to throw someone else the finger. Maybe it's because they're not as afraid to express themselves. Regardless someone saying a naughty word can't compare to the constant examples of prejudice and brutality that were commonplace in our not-so-distant past.

    Society has improved by leaps and bounds. You just have to take more people into consideration now, as before it was only a select few with power and control.
  • Cberg9
    Cberg9 Posts: 123
    This may not be popular but I believe much can be attributed to the "special snowflake" attitude that has become the norm in child upbringing over the last 20-25 years.
    The idea of participation trophies and not keeping score in games so that everyone is a winner.
    I get trying to establish self esteem but I think that has to come from self respect not an artificial atmosphere that is not the reality of life where there are winners and losers,successes and failures.

    The whole thing has led IMO to people that can`t understand or cope with the fact that sometimes things go wrong or not as we wish them to.
    Now the expectation is that whatever has happened must be made right by someone instantly because that is what is owed.
    When that doesn`t happen the reaction is anger,impatience and a need to lash out.

    I completely agree with this ^^ and this was the era I was raised in, however, my parents did not raise me this way and my son will not by brought up that way.
  • fbmandy55
    fbmandy55 Posts: 5,263 Member
    I think there are many issues from society that have contributed to this. Adults not punishing or disciplining their kids out of fear they will go to jail. A steady rise in people getting free food, free housing, free educations. People are catching on to the concept that they no longer have to earn things- there is the sense of entitlement. As far as kids growing up disrespectful, media has convinced us that there is an excuse for every behavior. This week a kid in a local high school choked and attacked an elderly teacher, the majority of the news comments were that "he had too much stress or he should get counseling because he is a damaged kid or he was targeted because of his race. The few that suggesting the kid just needed to learn some respect were bashed.

    When I was a kid, I had to do chores, make dinner, clean up dinner, set the table, sweep and did tons of yardwork. I have a half sister who is 9 years younger and my parents will make her a drink before making her get up and get one herself. Not to mention it was the norm for me to get clothes for school and holidays, not a monthly shopping trip. :explode:
  • Mom0fTwo
    Mom0fTwo Posts: 326 Member
    Yes. I do. But we will raise our boys to be men. Yes mam and No Sir. Thank you and can I help you with that. They know to give up there seat for an adult. Woman are not called names but cherished and respected. There Dad has the last say and money doesn't grow on trees. They know that a day may come where they have to fight for family and or country. And If it does, they won't do it with pants sagging half way down their behinds. A's and b's are expected. As one day hard work will be. Strict? Old fashioned? Yes.

    Amen!!!!
  • Entitlement.
  • nmerley
    nmerley Posts: 98 Member
    I couldnt help but sit here and chuckle. My family went out last evening and I had 3diff people come up to me and state that my 3yr old boy was way to polite. My reply was what do u want him to do run around the returant and say naughty words instead of sitting here quietly using his manners. They walked away. WTF??? We r raising him to use manners, be respectful, polite, and do whats right and I get ?ed about it. Yes my son is over polite but I would rather have that then some of the kids out there.
    Alot plays into how we r as a socity now adays. There is our up bringing, media, friends, ect. In a whole it can b resolved if more people cared.
  • outtanms
    outtanms Posts: 237 Member
    I am a "baby boomer." Think of this: nearly 450,000 people attended the Woodstock Festival in 1968. Traffic was backed up for days to get to the festival. There werent enough port-o-johns and lines to them were long. There were water and food shortages. Yet, No one was killed, there were no injuries as the result of fighting among attendees. There were no weapons found among attendees. This would not happen today. I am not saying this was a "better" generation or a more civil one-- but I don't think that a gathering of these many people could happen now without brawling, hard drugs, and murder.


    It seems as if as a society "we" do not have a collective sense of what "civil" behavior is; and it cuts across all socio-economic classes, ages, gender, and races. Where ever there are public "gatherings" (including "electronic" gatherings) there is a lack of mutual respect, or sense of "common good."


    ^^^^^They were all stoned @ Woodstock. No one was in a hurry, no one cared....We will get there when we get there. Awh..The good ol' days.
  • 1996gtstang
    1996gtstang Posts: 279 Member
    there is no doubt it has been in a downward spiral decade by decade
  • Hoppymom
    Hoppymom Posts: 1,158 Member
    This may not be popular but I believe much can be attributed to the "special snowflake" attitude that has become the norm in child upbringing over the last 20-25 years.
    The idea of participation trophies and not keeping score in games so that everyone is a winner.
    I get trying to establish self esteem but I think that has to come from self respect not an artificial atmosphere that is not the reality of life where there are winners and losers,successes and failures.

    The whole thing has led IMO to people that can`t understand or cope with the fact that sometimes things go wrong or not as we wish them to.
    Now the expectation is that whatever has happened must be made right by someone instantly because that is what is owed.
    When that doesn`t happen the reaction is anger,impatience and a need to lash out.

    And he hits a homerun!!!!! I like this answer.
  • Mom0fTwo
    Mom0fTwo Posts: 326 Member
    I also believe that kids nowadays are spoiled, I put my self through school, paid off all my school debt, bought my first car on my own, bought my first cell phone at 18 when i was legally able to do so and paid the bills myself, moved from Vancouver to Ontario using my own money and paid off 11k debt in 1 year, made my first adult purchase of an equinox on my own credit and half way to paying it off in one year, now saving for a house all by the age of 27, and if i didn't have the right parents growing up teaching me how to behave and live properly I don't think I would have done all this and had the great feeling of accomplishment i have now, oh i forgot to mention doing all this while having 2 kids lol
  • FaugHorn
    FaugHorn Posts: 1,060 Member
    And don't even get me started on what the feminist movement has done to the way women are now viewed and treated.

    ^^^^
    THIS

    You keep using these words...I do not think they mean what you think they mean...
  • splashangel
    splashangel Posts: 494 Member
    People have been whining about how awful the younger generation is since at least Roman times.

    In many ways, society today is a lot better than the 50s that people remember through the gauzy golden haze of nostalgia. But for anybody but middle- and upper-class straight white men, things have definitely gotten better in the last half a century.

    I recently read "The Better Angels of Our Nature," which examines in detail how much less violent and "civilized" our society is today than at any time in history: less war, less interpersonal violence, less violence against children and animals. If we have to lose some snob's idea of "class" to make a fairer and less violent society, so be it.

    "Better Angel's of Our Nature: Why Violence has Declined," by Steven Pinker.

    http://www.amazon.com/Better-Angels-Our-Nature-Violence/dp/0670022950/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1329496361&sr=1-1

    From a review:
    The final trend Pinker discusses is the “rights revolution,” the revulsion against violence inflicted on ethnic minorities, women, children, homosexuals and animals that has developed over the past half-century. Pinker is not, of course, arguing that these movements have achieved their goals, but he reminds us how far we have come in a relatively short time from the days when lynchings were commonplace in the South; domestic violence was tolerated to such a degree that a 1950s ad could show a husband with his wife over his knees, spanking her for failing to buy the right brand of coffee. . . .

    "http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/books/review/the-better-angels-of-our-nature-by-steven-pinker-book-review.html?pagewanted=all"
    Whining? Thats how you see our conversation? Pfft. The topic was not is there more violence? But since you brought it up... I spent 10 years as a police officer.The last 2 as an investigator. From experiance, I would have rather of delt with a 45 50 year old then a 15-20 year old. Now this was a good 12-14 years ago. Not only the mouth on alot (not all) of them but because they would just as soon fight you as look at you. It is getting worse. Do you think everyone on here has fallen for a myth. Do you think I can not remember growing up? That my grandmother is just senile because she can not believe how rude children have become? ( Again,not all) I respect this guy Pinker's harvard degree and all. I think it's awsome TED interviewed him. But, I answered this topic from what I know.Personally. She ask," Do YOU think people are lacking class" I think , for the most part, yes.
  • smantha32
    smantha32 Posts: 6,990 Member
    I couldnt help but sit here and chuckle. My family went out last evening and I had 3diff people come up to me and state that my 3yr old boy was way to polite. My reply was what do u want him to do run around the returant and say naughty words instead of sitting here quietly using his manners. They walked away. WTF??? We r raising him to use manners, be respectful, polite, and do whats right and I get ?ed about it. Yes my son is over polite but I would rather have that then some of the kids out there.
    Alot plays into how we r as a socity now adays. There is our up bringing, media, friends, ect. In a whole it can b resolved if more people cared.

    You are awesome. I can't even count the times someone's bratty out of control child ruined my meal in a public place. I wish there were more parents like you!
  • Cberg9
    Cberg9 Posts: 123
    People have been whining about how awful the younger generation is since at least Roman times.

    In many ways, society today is a lot better than the 50s that people remember through the gauzy golden haze of nostalgia. But for anybody but middle- and upper-class straight white men, things have definitely gotten better in the last half a century.

    I recently read "The Better Angels of Our Nature," which examines in detail how much less violent and "civilized" our society is today than at any time in history: less war, less interpersonal violence, less violence against children and animals. If we have to lose some snob's idea of "class" to make a fairer and less violent society, so be it.

    "Better Angel's of Our Nature: Why Violence has Declined," by Steven Pinker.

    http://www.amazon.com/Better-Angels-Our-Nature-Violence/dp/0670022950/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1329496361&sr=1-1

    From a review:
    The final trend Pinker discusses is the “rights revolution,” the revulsion against violence inflicted on ethnic minorities, women, children, homosexuals and animals that has developed over the past half-century. Pinker is not, of course, arguing that these movements have achieved their goals, but he reminds us how far we have come in a relatively short time from the days when lynchings were commonplace in the South; domestic violence was tolerated to such a degree that a 1950s ad could show a husband with his wife over his knees, spanking her for failing to buy the right brand of coffee. . . .

    "http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/books/review/the-better-angels-of-our-nature-by-steven-pinker-book-review.html?pagewanted=all"
    Whining? Thats how you see our conversation? Pfft. The topic was not is there more violence? But since you brought it up... I spent 10 years as a police officer.The last 2 as an investigator. From experiance, I would have rather of delt with a 45 50 year old then a 15-20 year old. Now this was a good 12-14 years ago. Not only the mouth on alot (not all) of them but because they would just as soon fight you as look at you. It is getting worse. Do you think everyone on here has fallen for a myth. Do you think I can not remember growing up? That my grandmother is just senile because she can not believe how rude children have become? ( Again,not all) I respect this guy Pinker's harvard degree and all. I think it's awsome TED interviewed him. But, I answered this topic from what I know.Personally. She ask," Do YOU think people are lacking class" I think , for the most part, yes.

    Now those 12-14 year olds would just as much kill you as look at you. They don't understand the consequenses of their actions and no one at home to hold them accountable. It's disgusting and very scary
  • treetop57
    treetop57 Posts: 1,578 Member
    Whining? Thats how you see our conversation? Pfft. The topic was not is there more violence? But since you brought it up... I spent 10 years as a police officer.The last 2 as an investigator. From experiance, I would have rather of delt with a 45 50 year old then a 15-20 year old. Now this was a good 12-14 years ago.

    15-20 year-olds have always been more violent than 45-50 year olds. The question is whether today's 15-20 year-olds are more violent than the 15-20 year-olds of thirty years ago. All the statistics say no. Violent crime is down quite a bit from thirty years ago, and most of that is due to a decline in youth violence.

    Do I see all this talk about how awful today's children are as whining? Yep, pretty much. And people have been doing it for time immemorial.
    Children nowadays are tyrants. They contradict their parents, gobble their food and tyrannise their teachers. --Socrates
  • treetop57
    treetop57 Posts: 1,578 Member
    Of course, people have every right to whine. I know you youngins can't help it: you were brought up by permissive parents who treated you each as a special unique snowflake, so you never learned to respect your elders.

    But if you must whine, GET OFF MY LAWN!

    :wink:
  • splashangel
    splashangel Posts: 494 Member
    Let's see.... look under the obnoxious posters name..... click on the triangle..... yea now, that's more like it.
  • ebbtime
    ebbtime Posts: 35 Member
    I work in a middle school. That alone should say enough! Being around those children, I have come to believe, it's the parents whose actions, or lack of, are teaching their children to act the same way. I have 5 children myself....3 are in middle school, 2 in elementary. I also believe it goes back a generation or 2. Somewhere along the line someone dropped the ball & it has escalated from there. I'm not bashing anyone or pointing fingers but respect has a huge part in this.

    ^^This^^ It all goes back to the narcissistic parenting style that really caught on with the GenXers and snowballed from there. You can tell the problem isn't caused by the teachers when you watch parents interact (or not) with their children in any public place. I fly a lot, and most parents who bring their kids on a plane could care less if there child is screaming, kicking the seats in front of them, throwing food around, and God forbid you say something about it. They have the 'right' to ruin the flight for all of the other passengers, because it's all about "Me Me Me". "My rights are important, you don't have any". You see the same thing in stores - it's ok for the kids to run around screaming, knocking into people, damaging the store merchandise, etc... and the parents completely tune them out. But they're the loudest out there on the front lines screaming about how you better not infringe on their rights to do whatever they want, whenever they want, even if it infringes on other people's rights. They don't have respect for other people (questionable as to whether they have respect for themselves), and they teach their kids the same thing.

    Civility and class are really based on having some consideration for others, and thinking of someone besides yourself. Unfortunately, it only seems to be getting worse, and I can't imagine what it would take to turn it around.





    I've had my children in stores and on a plane & care about how they act in public. On the plane, I had things for them to do for the entire ride. In stores, they just know better! It all comes down to parenting or lack of. I agree with you....it's not teachers' faults at all. It all begins in the home. So sad.
  • mikey1976
    mikey1976 Posts: 1,005 Member
    It's because these days children are all taught in school that they're entitled to get what they want. They're not allowed to fail, they're not allowed to excel, they aren't taught manners, and they aren't punished when they're obnoxious or disrespectful to others.

    this is so right. i stood up to my mom once and my dad put me out of the house. he said if i didn't like the rules to leave. that was the last time i ever did that again. i had to respect other or i new what i had comming when i got home. i respect every one until they screw up the trust issues. i'm not saying spank and beat the kids. i'm simply saying ground them take all the toys away tv. computer, phone, as a kid in the 1980s we where told to go play outside with friends or neighbor hood kids. that was a much safer time at least i feel this way. people seem so surprised when use manners and open the door not just ladies but for everyone. i'll go out of my way to help people to. thats just who i am by nature
  • maidentl
    maidentl Posts: 3,203 Member
    Whining? Thats how you see our conversation? Pfft. The topic was not is there more violence? But since you brought it up... I spent 10 years as a police officer.The last 2 as an investigator. From experiance, I would have rather of delt with a 45 50 year old then a 15-20 year old. Now this was a good 12-14 years ago.

    15-20 year-olds have always been more violent than 45-50 year olds. The question is whether today's 15-20 year-olds are more violent than the 15-20 year-olds of thirty years ago. All the statistics say no. Violent crime is down quite a bit from thirty years ago, and most of that is due to a decline in youth violence.

    Do I see all this talk about how awful today's children are as whining? Yep, pretty much. And people have been doing it for time immemorial.
    Children nowadays are tyrants. They contradict their parents, gobble their food and tyrannise their teachers. --Socrates

    Quit upsetting people with your pesky facts! :wink:
  • shanahan_09
    shanahan_09 Posts: 238 Member
    The original question was not about violence or general standard of living, so I'm not sure why people keep bringing that up.

    I'm also failry certain that the OP was not using the word "class" in a socio-economic context, i.e. upper, middle, lower, etc.. She was asking why being rude to each other seems to be acceptable in today's society (the words "hostile" and "angry" being used to describe those who flip people off while sitting in traffic or cursing in front of little kids at hockey games). So "class," in that sense, refers to a person's standard of behavior with regard to how he or she treats other people, not to that person's standing within society.

    And here's where it blows my mind that anyone thinks "people haven't changed." Things that used to be considered completely unacceptable at all but the absolute lowest levels of society (like men cursing in front of women and kids or people wearing pajamas to the grocery store) are now commonplace at all levels of society. People HAVE changed. Nobody has any respect for anyone anymore. And as much as people rationalize their behavior under a banner of "Live, and let live," it's all a load of garbage. When a dad can't take his son or daughter to a baseball game without having to request that some inconsiderate moron behind him watch his language, it's gone way beyond minding your own business.

    Civilized society requires that you take other people into consideration when you are anywhere but alone in your own home. There is nothing "civilized" about going out and mixing with other people with the attitude that you can do absolutely whatever you want and that everyone else should just leave you alone. That is the OPPOSITE of civilization. See Kant's Categorial Imperative.

    Thank you for saying this. I was not pertaining to class in a socio-economic context at all. Was refering to class as in manners, civility, integrity, and character.

    I do agree that it has to start with the children. There are too many lazy parents who won't put in the time to teach/nurture their kids so one day they will be adults who have those important attributes I mentioned above. But with that said, as adults we are responsible for ourselves, and if an adult has nothing but hostility towards others and is consistantly in a self-entitled mind-- unfortunately the cycle will continue.
  • Buddhasmiracle
    Buddhasmiracle Posts: 925 Member
    The original question was not about violence or general standard of living, so I'm not sure why people keep bringing that up.

    I'm also failry certain that the OP was not using the word "class" in a socio-economic context, i.e. upper, middle, lower, etc.. She was asking why being rude to each other seems to be acceptable in today's society (the words "hostile" and "angry" being used to describe those who flip people off while sitting in traffic or cursing in front of little kids at hockey games). So "class," in that sense, refers to a person's standard of behavior with regard to how he or she treats other people, not to that person's standing within society.

    And here's where it blows my mind that anyone thinks "people haven't changed." Things that used to be considered completely unacceptable at all but the absolute lowest levels of society (like men cursing in front of women and kids or people wearing pajamas to the grocery store) are now commonplace at all levels of society. People HAVE changed. Nobody has any respect for anyone anymore. And as much as people rationalize their behavior under a banner of "Live, and let live," it's all a load of garbage. When a dad can't take his son or daughter to a baseball game without having to request that some inconsiderate moron behind him watch his language, it's gone way beyond minding your own business.

    Civilized society requires that you take other people into consideration when you are anywhere but alone in your own home. There is nothing "civilized" about going out and mixing with other people with the attitude that you can do absolutely whatever you want and that everyone else should just leave you alone. That is the OPPOSITE of civilization. See Kant's Categorial Imperative.

    Very well put. And great post reference to Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Thank you for saying this. I was not pertaining to class in a socio-economic context at all. Was refering to class as in manners, civility, integrity, and character.

    I do agree that it has to start with the children. There are too many lazy parents who won't put in the time to teach/nurture their kids so one day they will be adults who have those important attributes I mentioned above. But with that said, as adults we are responsible for ourselves, and if an adult has nothing but hostility towards others and is consistantly in a self-entitled mind-- unfortunately the cycle will continue.
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    This made me think of something else random!

    I go to a school where hockey is huge. When I was a freshman and sophomore, one of the biggest chants was "F**k you ___________" and then fill in whatever school we were playing. When the older kids graduated, that cheer went away and I haven't heard it since. So I think some groups are just less classy and some are more classy. I hated that cheer because there were a lot of little kids there.

    That was random but I think it shows that people can become more classy. We now have a lot classier cheers.

    My school also had a problem earlier this year with people walking home from the bars and "disrespecting" neighbors' lawns. My school got really worried about that and is currently working with the neighbors to help solve the conflict. People want to become classy...I think it will eventually come back when people realize that they will eventually be judged for their actions.
  • Scott613
    Scott613 Posts: 2,317 Member
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS9UBzSp2oFJo0pZNfVyvyC98WKs2Od_Sb5wE34ioC2nJYlFPjm
  • jsielke
    jsielke Posts: 10 Member
    We certainly are lacking class, but what can you expect when the nation has become ruled by a "GIMMEE" mentality. Even our current President lacks the class to even place his hand over his heart when the National Anthem is played. When our elected leader have no class, are they not a reflection of the electorate. As a student, and one-time instructor of Ancient History, I can see this lack of "class" a a symptom of a incinerating society, which will eventually fail altogether. Makes me glad to be a "senior citizen" so I won't have to watch it to then end.
  • BaileyP3
    BaileyP3 Posts: 151 Member
    By reading the responses, not only do we lack class as a society - not enough money is invested in our educational system!

    I don't think it's up to teachers to raise their students. The job starts at home. A child that learns manners at home will be better equipped to behave in the classroom.
  • BaileyP3
    BaileyP3 Posts: 151 Member
    It's because these days children are all taught in school that they're entitled to get what they want. They're not allowed to fail, they're not allowed to excel, they aren't taught manners, and they aren't punished when they're obnoxious or disrespectful to others.

    The above paragraph is a result of using schools as the scapegoat for problems that originate AT HOME

    Discipline?

    This paragraph is a result of the lack of options for discipline we have as teachers. I remember being paddled by my first grade teacher. Now, we can't even touch a kid. If I pull a kid away from a fight, I can loose my job or get sued. Discipline now is just silent lunch, in-school suspension, and out-of-school suspension. The problem is, the students that are constant discipline problems that act the way the OP describes have no consequence AT HOME when they get in trouble at school. The parents behave a certain way, the child feels that is acceptable behavior.

    Manners?

    Well, we try, but if the child is allowed to use foul language or be disrespectful at home, it won't matter what we teach them at school. We do punish them, get a ear full full from the parents because we're picking on their kid, and the behavior continues. Once again, if it's allowed AT HOME, it doesn't matter that they got ISS or whatever because they are going home to no consequences.

    Failing?

    They are allowed to fail, I hand out plenty of F grades, BUT students are often still passed on to the next grade when they clearly don't have the knowledge. I can't tell you how many times I get a call from a parent, screaming at me because there's no way their kid could fail, and that I must "have it in" for them since I sent home an F on a report card. What happens on the next report card? The student fails again because it's not addressed AT HOME

    Hear! Hear Ebbtime! I work in middle school!!!

    JM

    Years ago teaching was a desirable job. You worked hard, you felt valued and in Canada you were appropriately compensated.
    Now I wouldn't be a teacher if my life depended on it.

    We have friends with a 6 year old. Last summer the dad told us that he was angry with the school system. Seems that 6 year old needed to improve his reading skills over the summer to keep with the class and the teacher recommended that the parents practice with him. Our friend said 'It's not my job to teach him to read. That's the schools job.' Keep in mind that this man and his wife are college educated with professional jobs. WTH?? I wonder what else he'll expect the school to do in order to raise his kid?
  • BaileyP3
    BaileyP3 Posts: 151 Member
    I couldnt help but sit here and chuckle. My family went out last evening and I had 3diff people come up to me and state that my 3yr old boy was way to polite. My reply was what do u want him to do run around the returant and say naughty words instead of sitting here quietly using his manners. They walked away. WTF??? We r raising him to use manners, be respectful, polite, and do whats right and I get ?ed about it. Yes my son is over polite but I would rather have that then some of the kids out there.
    Alot plays into how we r as a socity now adays. There is our up bringing, media, friends, ect. In a whole it can b resolved if more people cared.

    My husband and I make a point to stop by a table and compliment a family with well-behaved children whenever we're out. I think of it as positive reinforcement since most of the time all you hear is negativity. I'm sorry that you chose to respond that way. A polite 'thank you' might have been a more appropriate (and mannerly) response.
This discussion has been closed.