We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Troubleshoot with me...

jackiepedersen
jackiepedersen Posts: 7
edited January 17 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm in a weight-loss rut, and I know of the many factors that could be causing it, but I could use some help on determining which direction to go.

I have lost weight successfully before, and it seemed pretty cut and dry during those times. (maintain deficit of 1000 cals = lose two pounds a week. Bam. Simple.) My most successful time getting in great shape and down to a weight I was happy with was only two years ago. I then became pregnant, and after baby I had about 20 lbs to shed. At first, I assumed my difficulty losing after baby was due to breastfeeding-- though some women lose during it, I seemed to hang on.

But now, I am no longer breastfeeding, my baby is a year old, and though I am losing...it's verrrrrrrrry slow. I feel like I am working WAY too hard to lose this slowly.

Here's the scoop:
I'm training for a half-marathon. This means I currently log about 20-30 miles a week, depending on the week. I run 3-4 days a week, I do 45 minute circuit-training sessions with a trainer 2x per week, and I usually throw in a spin class twice a week on my 'off days' for running.

I usually wear my BodyMedia armband and aim for a 1200 deficit from those numbers. PLEASE NOTE: The reason I shoot for a "1200" deficit, is that I'm trying to allow for error-- this way I don't have to worry if something is off on my calorie counts by a bit, or if my activity was overestimated. It has worked well for me in the past.

I'm REALLY busy lately, so sometimes I just don't have time to make sure my armband is all charged and ready to go, so on days when I'm not wearing it, I log my exercise, but I underestimate a bit. For example, the MFP calculations always give me about 110-130 calories per mile when I run, I try to tweak it so that I'm only getting 'credit' for about 100 calories per mile.

I typically hit right where MFP has me each day and/or right at my "1200" deficit mark by my BodyMedia armband calculations.

This puts me, on most days, at about 1400-1600 calories, and on my long-run days I could go as high as 2000-2400 cals.

But.... my weight is barrrrrrrrely creeping downward. I'm not new to weight-loss, fitness, and general health knowledge. I read a ton, and I've experimented with it alot over the years.
I am very concerned about whole, healthy foods for myself and my family, so we eat minimal processed anything. I don't kid myself when logging calories. I always try to overestimate by a bit if I'm unsure, and I even log little things like the few bites of mini-wheats I stole from my kiddo's breakfast cereal bowl.

So: I've narrowed my possible culprits down to these things:

-- I'm eating too much
-- I'm not eating enough
-- I have to give up treat foods. Regardless of whether I fit them into my calorie balance for the day, maybe they're just screwing with me right now.
-- Something hormonal is going on that I can't identify

I REALLY honestly feel like I'm not eating high enough to say with confidence, "I'm eating too much!! That's clearly the culprit!" because, if I'm calculating for a 1000-1200 deficit by my own counts, then even with LOTS of error, I'd still be at a good, solid 500 deficit and be losing a pound a week.
I really don't feel like I'm eating too little, if I'm eating an average of 1600 with a high day or two thrown in on long run days.

But... maybe? I've never had to post a question like this before, because it's always been pretty clear to me what I needed to do. But I'm sick of saying, "It'll balance out next week...." and it just... doesn't. Up until January of this year, I was losing a few here and there, but only half-trying. Now, I've been serious about this since January, and in that time I've only lost 6-7 pounds (on a GOOD scale day), 1.5 in. from my waist, 3 in. from my hips, and about 3.5 % bodyfat. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad for those accomplishments, but I know that with what I'm doing, I should be seeing better results in this amount of time. I feel like I'm dedicating 80% of my free time (which is precious as a wife, mom of three, and a high-school teacher) to this, it needs to be WORTH it! I'm glad to be healthy and increasing my fitness levels, but I also still have weight to lose. It needs to come off.

Stats (so you know I'm not shooting for anything unrealistic) :

Female, 30, 5'5", 156 (goal:135), waist 30 in/ hips 39 in, current bf% 26, jeans size: comfortable 10, tight 8

Replies

  • Well, that's why I shoot for a 1200 deficit instead of the proper 1000, I'm trying to allow for armband over-estimation.

    Even if my armband was wildly overestimating (which it really doesn't seem to, it gives me about 100 cals/per hour during my normal day, about 70-80 cals per hour once I go to bed, a little over 100 cals/mile running, and only about 320 calories for a 45 minute spin class... those are pretty reasonable and down-to-earth. Not like the people who say "Yay!! My armband says I burned 1000 calories in Zumba class!!")
  • majope
    majope Posts: 1,325 Member
    I'd be patient. 3 inches from your hips since January? You rock.

    Also, from another runner who's training for a HM: you need to fuel your runs. Slow weight loss is excellent. You might even go for a smaller deficit, at least until after the race. I set my deficit for half a pound a week, and find that it works for me (but I use a HRM, not a Fitbit--I can't speak to any problems you might be having with that).
  • veganbaum
    veganbaum Posts: 1,865 Member
    Honestly, I think shooting for a daily 1000-1200 deficit when you only have 20 pounds to lose is unrealistic. I would suggest trying a 500 deficit for a month and see how that goes. What have you got to lose?
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,470 Member
    With only 20ish pounds to lose, a 1000 calorie deficit is too aggressive. Of course you aren't losing. Try a 500 calories deficit. You should have success there.

    The last 10-20 pounds are tough and slow-going for everyone.
  • ...and maybe that's just something I need to come to terms with. When I started really successfully losing weight two years ago, I was at about 185. I had a good 50-55 lbs to lose.

    I still don't *feel* like the person that's "down the last few" that needs to shrink their deficit. But perhaps I need to shift my image of which 'category I fit into'. When people say "the last 15", I always picture the person who's already at a healthy weight, but wants to really shred. I'm not even 'technically' in a healthy weight-range until I'm out of the 150s. I mean, of course I *know* that I am a healthy, active woman.... but I guess that's why I still feel like the girl that has a decent amount left to lose.
  • ^^Truthfully, also, part of why I've put off shifting to a 500 deficit for so long is that when you're at that small of a deficit, any little miscalculation can inadvertently cost you that week's loss. So a 1000 deficit felt easier to me, because I didn't have to stress about every tiny thing.
  • Thanks, btw, Majope. :) That was nice of you to high-five me. We all need that.

    And I'm not downplaying it, but keep in mind that my body *is* still bouncing back from baby, so some of that three inches is due to my hips continuing to close back up, I can't confidently say it's ALL fat loss from that area.

    As for fueling runs, I think that's where I'm finding it's so hard to balance. I DO want to run well. I ALSO would like all this damn running to slim me down! :D Sigh. Fine line, right?
  • ...and maybe that's just something I need to come to terms with. When I started really successfully losing weight two years ago, I was at about 185. I had a good 50-55 lbs to lose.

    I still don't *feel* like the person that's "down the last few" that needs to shrink their deficit. But perhaps I need to shift my image of which 'category I fit into'. When people say "the last 15", I always picture the person who's already at a healthy weight, but wants to really shred. I'm not even 'technically' in a healthy weight-range until I'm out of the 150s. I mean, of course I *know* that I am a healthy, active woman.... but I guess that's why I still feel like the girl that has a decent amount left to lose.

    How are you determining a "healthy weight range" by BMI? If you are, BMI is a terrible ting to go by. You should go by your body fat %.
    True, true. And I was about to counter you and say "I'm not in a healthy bf% range yet either".. but.... I just checked and I see that 'healthy' for women is from about 21-33%. :blushing: So.... ok. I'd like to be somewhere between 22-24%...
    But I see your point.
This discussion has been closed.