Eating back exercise calories

Here's my explanation on why you should eat them back if you're using MFP's built-in method:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/mrsbigmack/view/finding-the-sweet-spot-452184

But keep in mind, your total daily calorie burn is an estimate, your calories burned by exercise are estimated and your calories eaten and recorded in your diary are also only an estimate. There is a huge margin of error.

If you eat them back and don't lose, go for half. If you don't eat them back but also don't log certain things then you're probably fine. If you're losing no matter what you're doing, keep doing it. It's working.

I will hardly ever eat mine back, I burn off on some days over 1000 cals, most days it's close to that & I just cant eat them all back. I will only eat IF I AM HUNGRY. I'm not going to force myself to eat when I'm not.

I typically eat back some of them on the day of and then because I save for a treat meal, I eat back some of them after the fact. I've been steadily losing anywhere from half a pound to a pound a week, so for me, that works. I think for many people it depends on the person. I have my calories set to 1400/day and I average around 1250-1300 with eating the calories back. For the most part, I pay attention to how many calories I have allotted for a week and use that instead of the daily amount. A deficit is a deficit, right?

If you are following MFP you are suppose to eat them back.

If you are follow some other method then most likely not.

Thanks for this question because I'm new to MFP and was a bit confused about this aspect. I guess we're supposed to eat them back to maintain a steady and safe loss of fat. However, after going through a few people's diets I see they're eating 500-1000 calories less than MFP recommends. I'm sure it leads to rapid weight loss (not necessarily fat loss) but isn't that unsafe?

Thanks for this question because I'm new to MFP and was a bit confused about this aspect. I guess we're supposed to eat them back to maintain a steady and safe loss of fat. However, after going through a few people's diets I see they're eating 500-1000 calories less than MFP recommends. I'm sure it leads to rapid weight loss (not necessarily fat loss) but isn't that unsafe?

Actually it doesn't lead to rapid weight loss for long. it will leads to you stalling out and not losing at all.

So true...I stalled out and had to up my calories to kick start the losing again.....lot's written about that on MFP boards

You are supposed to be eating them back because of MFP methodology. As someone else stated in this thread, the way MFP calculates calories (which is way different than using other methods) is that your base calories are at bare bones levels. Yes, you are still at a caloric deficit and will lose weight if you bed ridden all day. You then "earn" extra calories when you exercise so you are supposed to eat them back. Other methods, such as using your TDEE, give you a certain amount of calories which is more per day than MFP, but those calories already take into account your exercise level, among other things. So you don't eat automatically eat them back. You do have to calculate your TDEE more often than MFP so you know if you should be consuming more or less calories per day or week when your weight changes or your exercise level changes. There's an EXCELLENT thread on here http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/750920-spreadsheet-for-bmr-tdee-deficit-macro-calcs-hrm-zones which includes a link to a download of an excel spreadsheet which explains all of this in great detail and also guides you through how to calculate your TDEE among other important numbers. It also explains that TDEE calculators and other numbers can/will vary. This masterpiece of which obviously took a lot of thought and time to do,and which I appreciate so very much, also gives you various choices of methods on the tabs and explains each method, PLUS it gives you a way to "tweak" MFP so that MFP will integrate nicely with whatever method you choose.IT answered so many of my questions, the "eating back cals" here was my number one question and concern and I never got a response to it. I guess the old hands here are tired of explaining it to the newbies.

One thing to note....ever play with your MFP settings? It's kind of a joke. You can say you want to lose 2 lbs per week, 1 lb or .5 or maintain, and it still gives you the exact same calculations. Never 2 lbs. Ever. Same as choosing Sedentary or Highly Active. Same. Iy doesn't matter at all so I am not sure what the point of even asking is. Now I understand why many of the most experienced members here and practically all the Personal Trainers and the Lifters say that 1200 cal sustained per day is unhealthy and also why they all seem to use TDEE.

Anyway, check out that thread if you are interested in this kind of thing. It's a fantastic tool, even if not well received by some.

Take care! .

I don't, I have my tdee set based off the num of days I train, and the cardio is the extra cals I've accounted for to aid in weight-loss.

I lose well eating them back so can't see the point in making myself hungry and miserable. I also want to keep my immune system as high as it can be so malnutrition isn't a desirable option for me.

Joe does something similar to what I do and eat at maintenance and whatever exercise I do during the week will be my deficit.

Kind of but no. I eat at a caloric deficit of about 500-800 a day. It zig-zags each day but is designed to put me in a big enough deficit to lose about 1.6lbs a week based off my lifting schedule (3-5 days a week). I add in cardio just for extras so I don't eat back.

ETA:
So say for example I were to lift weights and burn 300-500 cals I don't add that to my diary, I only add cardio. The weight lifting day is accounted for based off my original TDEE calculation. One day I may be lower because of training but the next day I might be way closer to maintenance because of no training. Eating back would just cause me to overeat past my goals.

Plus eating back can be a big prob because most machines that estimate cals burned are SUPER inaccurate causing many to over estimate expenditure.