Maximizing calorie burn during cardio

You can spin at any speed, just as you can run at any speed, ski at any speed, or swim at any speed. Saying "running burns the most calories" is kind of moot since it depends on the level of intensity and speed. I definitely burn WAY more calories sparring at brazilian jiujitsu than I do running, because I run at a sustainable pace and I do NOT spar at a sustainable pace.

I think 10 calories per minute is a good goal. Most intense exercises should get you around there, give or take.

I am not "allowed" to run, so what do I do? :ohwell:

If your goal is to maximize calorie burn then you need to run. No other exercise burns more calories per minute than running.

BS

This content has been removed.

If your goal is to maximize calorie burn then you need to run. No other exercise burns more calories per minute than running.

I weigh 173 lbs and burn around 13 calories per minute running at an effort level that I can easily maintain for over 2 hours when I want to go that long.

besides elliptical.

And swimming.

And jumping jacks.

And...

I burn an extra 20 or so calories per mile if I move up in my heart rate zones. I usually try to keep things in the 75% range personally.

That said, I also like to mix in interval training more than steady running.

hmmm no one going to point out that 500+ calories is a huge amount of burn? if you actually are burning that much, you should be super happy.

p.s. heart rate monitors are notoriously inaccurate at calculating calories burned.

This content has been removed.

You want to maximize calorie burn, do High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT). You want the research behind it. Here is a basic article on HIIT. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-intensity_interval_training.

You can spin at any speed, just as you can run at any speed, ski at any speed, or swim at any speed. Saying "running burns the most calories" is kind of moot since it depends on the level of intensity and speed. I definitely burn WAY more calories sparring at brazilian jiujitsu than I do running, because I run at a sustainable pace and I do NOT spar at a sustainable pace.

I think 10 calories per minute is a good goal. Most intense exercises should get you around there, give or take.

this isn't true. At least, all the research I have read indicate that running at 10 MPH or 3 MPH burns the same. And, I've tested it myself and it's true. Now, walking and running are different, despite the popular myths that they are the same.

I don't know which cardio is best. I'm sure there is something out there better than running. i can run 6 miles and get a good burn, but I'm hardly dying. There are some sports that are far more demanding that I think would burn more calories. But, I'm not sure.

Anyway, that's my $.02.

the best fat burn for cardio exercise is HIIT. Google it.

Well, firstly, if you run 30 minutes at 10mph that is definitely going to burn more than if you run 30 minutes at 3mph. I'm assuming you meant for equal distances. In that case it is closer, but the things I've read indicate it will still burn more if you run @ 10mph than if you walk @ 3mph.

And to play devil's advocate a bit, you can do HIIT with running. We do that at my gym for one class. It's way harder than running at a comfortable pace for the same amount of time, so I suspect it burns a lot more calories as well.

OK, I'm not going to get all technical. But, mile for mile, calories burnt running at different speeds is the same. The research says that, and I've tested it with my HRM. Not that my HRM is 100% accurate, but at faster sppeds or doing HIIT while running, it winds up the same. So, as far as I am concerned, the studies that back that up are accurate.

As far as walking, walking DOES NOT bun the same as running, when comparing distance. If you walk 5 miles and run 5 miles, you will burn more calories on the run than on the walk. I've seen studies on this too, and the conclusion was that walking is at least 20% less, and in most cases, more than 20 like up to 45%.

During the run I believe this is true. But AFTER the run, the higher intensity will lead to a post-workout burn that lasts longer. At least, that is what I've read. I don't know if it has since been debunked.

I get what you're all saying about running, which is cool. But what would an ideal calorie burn per minute be?

(not per mile)

It's impossible to put a number to it because besides weight it is dependant on the exercise and the individual's fitness level.

For me 13 calories per minute is ideal because it is easily sustainable day after day for pretty much as long as I want to keep going.

If you want to burn more calories you have to pick a harder exercise and develop the aerobic fitness needed for the large muscle groups in the legs to work harder at a lower exertion level.

I do cardio classes at my gym a couple days a week like spin, a kick boxing type class or step. The classes generally run around 55 mins and my HRM always indicates around 560-580 calories burned. Whether I am taking it easy, or really pushing hard, I never seem to be able to increase that number (since losing weight).

The problem is not with you but with the measurement. The heart rate monitor is guessing at the calories you burn in that hour by the number of time your heart beats, which is only minimally associates with the number of calories you burn.

If you have the same average heart rate for an hour, your heart rate monitor will report back more or less the same number, no matter how many calories you actually burned.

So I'm wondering, is there a maximum calorie burn you should aim for when doing cardio?

There is, but it's a lot higher than you think.

The most calories you can burn is dependent on a number of things. Your VO2max (the maximum amount of oxygen your body can deliver to the muscles and process per minute) is one. Your functional threshold (also called lactate threshold, onset of blood lactate, and anaerobic threshold) is another.

The highest VO2max ever recorded was about 7 liters per minute. Each liter is roughly 5 calories. So a world record holding athlete can burn 35 calories per minute for 5 minutes (then he will collapse and need to recover). An average, moderately trained female will do about 3 liters per minute. That's a maximum 15 calories per minute for 5 minutes before you need a break. Most heart monitors tell you far more than that.

To put times on them, the VO2max is roughly the hardest you can go for five minutes. The functional threshold is the hardest you can go for an hour. (I know, I'm oversimplifying, but I'm also not trying to write a treatise on aerobic energy delivery). Athletes spend their entire career trying to raise their VO2max and to sustain a higher percentage of it at functional threshold.

The "hardest" measurements that I mentioned are not measured in heart rate. If you keep working harder, you will never see a heart rate of 280 beats per minute. Instead, your heart becomes more efficient, pumping more blood per beat and putting more oxygen into the blood. The intensity must be measured in something more absolute, like power (wattage) or speed (under controlled conditions). Usually they are tested on a treadmill or a bike with the speed being gradually increased every minute until you cannot go any faster.

Burning more calories means going harder on an absolute scale (like speed or power), not a relative one (like heart rate), for the entire hour. Unfortunately, as you get fitter, your heart rate monitor cannot tell the difference. When you get fitter, you go faster at the same heart rate (whether you get leaner or not).

Cool. I believe that the after burn is better on HIIT and hard fast runs vs just a nice slower paced run. Makes sense. But, I haven't seen any research concluded on that aspect of it.

After I posted that I tried to find some convincing articles. I found more articles that say this is true according to research than those that don't, but the ones that say it doesn't work that way seem to be more recent. So, as with anything, the answer is... who the heck knows?

There is no best cardio. The best cardio is probably the one that engages the most muscle groups at the highest heart rate for YOU. There have been studies that once you exercise over a certain amount of time the "value" of the exercise diminishes. I think it's over 2.5 hours of exercise, but I can't remember off hand. Why does it even matter? If your heart is healthy cardio only really serves to modify your caloric intake.

You don't gain muscle with extensive cardio, so... lift weights?