Does anybody else hate counting calories?
Replies
-
I think we are where we are on the charts with weight because we do not schedule health in our daily lives...we stop thru a drive thru because its convenient, we eat late night snacks because we are rushing to bed etc...
I personally love watching the calories i put in my body but I am not depriving myself of food...if i want steak, i eat steak, i just proportion it...if i want chocolate, i eat chocolate, just in small calorie size.0 -
I agree. Its not so much that I hate counting calories. I hate that I can't trust my food. I think its insane that we have to focus on it at all. Eating is a natural part of survival. You don't see lions stopping and saying, I can't eat this lamb because I already had an antelope today. We forget that we too are animals. Eating is for survival, it is necessary! Yet here in the US, it is for profit and social acceptance. We've totally lost track of what is important to human survival.
I'd love to live a totally natural life. While I'm considered more natural than anyone in my circle of social surroundings, it doesn't actually mean anything. Living naturally should not take any work at all. However, for those of us who choose to live a less hectic, proccessed, chemically coated, typical American lifestyle, its actually more work. Its easier to pop a frozen lasagna in the oven and jump on the tredmil in the morning (not that I'm against tredmills) yet its more work to provide a meal that is regognisable by the human body as food and get exercise just from being human. Like by getting and preparing your own food. (that used to take alot of work)
Why can't I even have an organic garden in my own yard? Because if my neighbors still use chemicals in their gardens and on their lawns, I can't totally prevent the soil from washing into my yard.... let alone it washes into the ground water that I water my garden with anyway.
I may just be rambling now, but this is something that I think about often. Our society is so focused on the American dream that we've let go of the dreams of humanity in general. I wonder what our ancestors would think. Those wild beasts who ran around on the African savannah, were the size of modern bodybuilders without carb loading, weight lifting, or steroids. They had morals and cared for their elderly and sick without nurses, drugs, or emergency rooms. And they are the reason we are here, yet for some reason, we still think they were less intelligent. Could a modern man elude a lion without a gun? Could we feed a town without a factory? No. I don't think todays technology makes us smarter, I think its made us lazy, which has made us dumber in a sense.
OK, I'm done now. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.0 -
I agree. Its not so much that I hate counting calories. I hate that I can't trust my food.
SO. TRUE. When I read the thread title I thought that anymore I don't mind counting calories, it's EVERYTHING ELSE that drives me crazy. Do companies sit around talking about just how much sodium and sugar they can force into everything they produce? Like today my totals are all messed up because I wanted to have a ham sandwich and the sodium was through the roof. When I look at nutritional info anymore I could almost care less about calories, I have to skim down and see if I'm going to end up retaining a bathtub's amount of water from all the salt.
Alot of posters have already hit on the point that we're so rushed and grab the easiest, cheapest, and therefore most processed foods around. I know it, but I still find it hard to get away from them too. I grew up with my dad in a really poor household and Everything was cheap and processed. Now that I'm trying to do better for myself I find that I don't know what to buy, make, and eat. I hardly know how to cook and recipes with alot of ingredients kinda scare me away. It's almost like I've lost control of part of my life.0 -
I may just be rambling now, but this is something that I think about often. Our society is so focused on the American dream that we've let go of the dreams of humanity in general. I wonder what our ancestors would think. Those wild beasts who ran around on the African savannah, were the size of modern bodybuilders without carb loading, weight lifting, or steroids. They had morals and cared for their elderly and sick without nurses, drugs, or emergency rooms. And they are the reason we are here, yet for some reason, we still think they were less intelligent. Could a modern man elude a lion without a gun? Could we feed a town without a factory? No. I don't think todays technology makes us smarter, I think its made us lazy, which has made us dumber in a sense.
OK, I'm done now. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.
holly, i so agree with you! because of my kids, i think about this alot, especially in the schools. it is astounding to me that our forefathers were mostly homeschooled, mostly taught history from the bible, were considered to only have the equivalent of an eight grade education, but yet i feel they could THINK better than any of us today. ugh! my son was asked a question the other day that he should have been able to figure out on his own but instead he said 'i don't know, can i google it?' because of the ease in finding answers online/food sources/material possessions, none of us has to work as hard and we have become very lazy as a society (even though we think we are working harder that any generation before us).
i recently bought a betty crocker cookbook and i was looking for a recipe to make fetticine alfredo. instead of having a recipe for the sauce, the ingredients actually called for you to buy a jar of it instead of making it. how crazy is that?!? even our cookbooks no longer have us cooking, but heating up processed junk.0 -
You don't see lions stopping and saying, I can't eat this lamb because I already had an antelope today.
love this!
it's a lot of work to grow food; we have done a true disservice to not only ourselves, but to our children, the soil, the water and the air all in the name of "progress."
i sometimes wonder what would happen if everybody over the age of 16 just up and died. how would our kids survive after there were no more pop tarts and tasty ohs? that's why i started working with kids and building /managing community gardens. it's my responsibility as a citizen of this really wonderful country (with all its faults) to engage them in what it costs to eat a strawberry.
the kids dig it, too, when we give them the chance to.0 -
i recently bought a betty crocker cookbook and i was looking for a recipe to make fetticine alfredo. instead of having a recipe for the sauce, the ingredients actually called for you to buy a jar of it instead of making it. how crazy is that?!? even our cookbooks no longer have us cooking, but heating up processed junk.
joy of cooking, anything pre-1970. it's like my bible.0 -
i recently bought a betty crocker cookbook and i was looking for a recipe to make fetticine alfredo. instead of having a recipe for the sauce, the ingredients actually called for you to buy a jar of it instead of making it. how crazy is that?!? even our cookbooks no longer have us cooking, but heating up processed junk.
joy of cooking, anything pre-1970. it's like my bible.
thanks. i had the recipe in an older better crocker cookbook (which is pretty ratty so i had wanted to upgrade), but the newer version has cut much of it's 'food' out. i kept the tattered and tired one and tossed the other.0 -
i recently bought a betty crocker cookbook and i was looking for a recipe to make fetticine alfredo. instead of having a recipe for the sauce, the ingredients actually called for you to buy a jar of it instead of making it. how crazy is that?!? even our cookbooks no longer have us cooking, but heating up processed junk.
I can't agree with this enough. I actually have trouble finding "ingredient" type food. Like rice vinegar. Took three trips to the store! Because stores carry only what people actually buy and people seem to only buy pre-cooked food lately. Seriously, if I had been in the market for hamburger helper or a frozen bagged dinner, I would have had a plethora of choices. I just wanted ANY rice vinegar to prepare fish with. I have this problem with a log of ingredients. No one cooks, so no one sells actual ingredients.
A friend of mine was recently making a cake for someone's birthday. She wanted to make a pineapple angel food cake. Almost every recipe called for buying a boxed cake mix and a can of pineapple in syrup. How twisted is that?0 -
People have always had to worry about food, but for most of history it has been from the opposite view point. I am glad that I worry about getting too much rather than whether or not the early frost or lack of game is going to starve my family to death next winter.0
-
Wow - so many varied points of view! It's just so, so interesting to see what people's beliefs are these days. That's the anthropologist in me... haha
keith0373 - the issue is worrying to a point of obsession, of disorder. i think that the costs outweigh the benefits of cheap food loaded with corn-derived chemicals and additives, and the system surely doesn't make sense when 1 billion people are starving and 1 billion are obese/overweight, some countries sitting on mounds and mounds of food and others going without. it's just not a sustainable system. agriculture and human 'progress' per se have helped some of the world's population immensely, but i think we've forgotten how fortunate we are, especially in this country.
everybody on this thread, no matter whether you love or hate calories/food science, my goodness - watch this video of Paul Roberts. please. it's so... so... good. the guy just wrote a book a couple of years ago, and it discusses the global food crisis, food quality, industrialization... seriously just listen to him.
http://fora.tv/2008/06/18/Paul_Roberts_The_End_of_Food0 -
People have always had to worry about food, but for most of history it has been from the opposite view point. I am glad that I worry about getting too much rather than whether or not the early frost or lack of game is going to starve my family to death next winter.
While I agree on some level (I would hate to have to starve my family over the winter, too), the fact that we get processed food doesn't entirely eliminate the possibility of that happening.
We are fortunate to have the ability to grow food. I live on a reasonably seasonal diet - my only "treats" really are things like chips & pop which if they didn't exist would be all the better for me, but I digress...
There are lots and lots of things to eat that grow wild, even in the winter. But mostly in the winters before industrialization, people ate storage foods like potatoes, beans, carrots, grains, etc..
Some greens, like kale, grow well into winter and benefit from a few frosts becoming sweeter as a result.
I think the biggest problem we are facing today regarding food is the actual lack of real food and varieties of food. Did you realize that the half-dozen varieties of apples in supermarkets represent far less than 10% of the apples that exist? I'm just guessing at 10%.. it could be way, way less than that, but the point is that there are hundreds of varieties, but most people don't know about them because they're not on the shelf.
Same with tomatoes, squash, peppers, greens (so many greens)... we're developing a corporate monoculture of food, that when it fails, many will starve because the base of their diets are corn, soy and corn-and-soy-fed meats. This is how the potato famine happened, too, because the Irish depended on one type of potato. When it went into a natural blight (as all crops do from time to time), they starved. Peru, on the other hand, had that same blight come through, but were literally unscathed because they had many varieties of potato available. One crop went bad, the rest were fine.
We're breeding on dangerous ground. And now we want to genetically alter what's left so these foods can withstand greater and greater applications of herbicides and pesticides. And pretend for a moment that those applications are safe for the food, but what about neighboring communities, soil quality and water runoff?
And this doesn't even TOUCH the idea about transporting out-of-season produce from distant places in our winters / exporting them in our summers. The oil cost alone is astounding.
So on one hand I feel grateful and on the other I feel sad. The best thing we can do for ourselves is to grow our own, or support a CSA or Farmer's Market, using the grocery as our last resort. And even then, be choosy.
I'm not one to suggest ridding of the industrial food market all together; what I would suggest is that we try to soften its footprint. We're so lucky on so many levels and we have so much to offer, why put it all in one basket?0 -
I love counting calories! I can't wait to log my food everyday haha!0
-
Wow, thank you so much!0 -
you're welcome kayemme!
I have a few quotes for all of you wonderful people who have responded to this thread. They come from the man I'm food-crushing on, Michael Pollan:
"How did humans manage to choose foods and stay healthy before there were nutrition experts and food pyramids or breakfast cereals promising to improve your child’s focus or restaurant portions bigger than your head? We relied on culture, which is another way of saying: on the accumulated wisdom of the tribe. (Which is itself another way of saying: on your mom and your friends.)"
So... people did pretty dang well without calorie counting before the industrialization of food/food products due to cultural practices. Culture is supposed to be adaptive, that is, helping a species survive. It's terrifying when our culture is obsessed with health and is extremely sick. It also weirds me out that so many people are obsessed with Jillian Michaels. So she's got a hot bod, probably helped a lot by genetics, though she won't tell you that. I'm sure she's a nice person... I just don't.. nevermind. Also, just about every food product that big companies put out these days has to have some weird health claim or "this MAY help raise your levels of xyz..." to get the thing to sell:
"When Froot Loops can earn a Smart Choices check mark, a new industrywide label that indicates a product’s supposed healthfulness, we know we can’t rely on the marketers, with their dubious health claims, or for that matter on the academic nutritionists who collaborate on such labeling schemes."
Just some food for thought. Or rather, thought for food.0 -
I'm kind of late on this topic, but I love what you all have been saying. Counting calories is so much more a necessity because our own greed. We wouldn't have to be obsessed about fat types (trans fats!), carbs, sodium, or weird compounds being added if we hadn't allowed this to occur. There seems to be a trend that we can beat nature and I'm skeptical of that. Take this miracle pill to fix this disease! Where if you just ate real foods you wouldn't have that disease. The desire for cash and expediency has overtaken our lives. Luckily, there are many of us out here who do want change and those who do still know how to do things the real way (organic farmers) that we can partner with. We've gotten so far removed from nature - people don't even want to touch dirt! Gotta be 99.99% germ free! So how are they going to want to eat the real foods that might have a bug hole in the leaf?
Like someone said with the potato blight, I've heard, too, that we're on the path to doom. There are so many things out there that we could be eating that we aren't. Russett potatoes and yellow corn! And I live in the south, so don't forget the macaroni and cheese plants - since apparently they are a vegetable here...
We can't trust our government to tell us what is honestly decent for us - the food pyramid is built upon interest groups and lobbying. Luckily places like Harvard's SPH Nutrition Source are around and look at data to give us information.
And the recipes! Oy! Apparently no one knows how to cook anymore. Dump a can of this in a can of this with a box of that and that's "dinner." It's gross. I recently told my nutrition coach that I need help with cooking because I can't keep spending 2hours cooking, that I need to learn to cook healthy in 20minutes. Sadly, I've realized that if I am honestly starting out with the raw material, I have to spend 2hours. (Yes I can prep earlier by chopping veggies) But real food takes time to cook.
Alright. I'll stop and I apologize if this was a bit disjointed. I could rant for a while on a bunch of things related!
But on topic, counting calories sucks because my food is made with trickery!0 -
... but when I was there, eating lunch took hours. So did dinner. You get small portions of delicious, pleasurable food, and you eat slowly and savor the bites.
You just hit the nail on the head and answered your own question. Who here has an employer that allows for 2 hours to eat lunch? Who has 2 hours once they get home to eat dinner (let alone 2 hours to prepare it.) I think our food laws should be a heck of a lot more stringent but I don't foresee America becoming like France or Italy when it comes to the long drawn out meal aspect and so... we have calorie counting. You do what works for you.
Oh and there are tons of people on this site that aren't American and are also counting calories.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions