A Healthier Alternative to that Mocha Latte
Replies
-
Check out the ingredients in the powdered "creamer". I wouldn't call this a "healthier" alternative. Perhaps a less caloric one but certainly not "healthier".0
-
bump0
-
how about try it sugar -free star bucks can do it that way because i do it I'm a diabetic so i do it that way :smile its easy an if you still want to do it with sugar try sweet-n-low or equal you could requested it that way it's works just the same give a try an let know how everyone likes them ENJOY AN HAVE FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!0
-
Rich Chocolate is the one I experimented with, but I have since picked up Malt to try.0
-
I have to be very careful of anything that claims to be "sugar-free".. as whatever they use for sugar substitution can make me sick very very quickly. I'm much better off sticking with raw sugar (turbinado).0
-
bump:happy:0
-
I agree with you... nowhere did I mention the drink as being healthy, and I can't imagine anyone thinking the Starbucks version really is either... however here are those stats you requested right from the Coffee-mate website. It basically consists of not a lot of anything. Cheers!:drinker:
Nutrition Facts
Serving Size 1 tsp (2g)
Amount Per Serving
Calories 10
Calories From Fat 5
% Daily Value*
Total Fat 0.5g
1%
Saturated Fat .5g
3%
Trans Fat 0g
Polyunsaturated Fat 0g
Monounsaturated Fat 0g
Cholesterol 0mg
0%
Sodium 0mg
0%
Total Carbohydrate 1g
0%
Sugars 0g
Protein 0g
*Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.
Not a significant source of dietary fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, and iron.
INGREDIENTS: CORN SYRUP SOLIDS, VEGETABLE OIL (PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED COCONUT OR PALM KERNEL, HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN), SODIUM CASEINATE (A MILK DERIVATIVE)**, AND LESS THAN 2% OF DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE (MODERATES COFFEE ACIDITY), MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES (PREVENTS OIL SEPARATION), SODIUM ALUMINOSILICATE, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR, ANNATTO COLOR.
** Not a source of lactose.
Current as of November, 2009. Please see shelf packaging for any changes.0 -
Check out the ingredients in the powdered "creamer". I wouldn't call this a "healthier" alternative. Perhaps a less caloric one but certainly not "healthier".
I didn't think she was claiming it to be "healthy"0 -
I really need to get me some Ovaltine and Reddi Whip now!!!0
-
That sounds good! I am a Chai Latte freak and it's killing me in sugar.
Mary Ann
It's really yummy, you don't need to add milk, I have a 10 gram serving per mug at 46.5 calories!0 -
OMG!! I just made this. GIRL you were right on. It takes exactly like a mocha latte. At first I thought the Ovaltine was a little expensive then I realized its the cost of 2 Grande mocha. I just may be officially done with Starbucks!! Thanks again!0
-
Check out the ingredients in the powdered "creamer". I wouldn't call this a "healthier" alternative. Perhaps a less caloric one but certainly not "healthier".
I didn't think she was claiming it to be "healthy"0 -
0
-
a big BUMP (must try later!) THANKS OP!0
-
Thank you for posting this... However I would strongly recommend the use of real milk, or Almond or Coconut milk in the place of non dairy creamers. They are so unhealthy for you, and because your body doesn't even recognize them as food, they get stored as fat.
Read this:
http://bodyandhealth.canada.com/channel_section_details.asp?text_id=5709&channel_id=9&relation_id=26047
Also, be aware that at Starbucks you could get any latte nonfat, and also sugar free (although again be careful with Sugar free sweeteners) a Tall skinny latte is only 90 cals, grande 120 and venti 160.0 -
I've started using Atkins Mocha Latte Protien Shakes. Healthier and I have grown to like them.0
-
Oh wow, I can have my whip cream again!! Reddi Whip low fat, here i come!!!!0
-
Sounds YUMMY! thank you =D0
-
Thanks! i gotta have the whip on "special" days lol.. being pregnant now though, whenever i feel like it0
-
bump for later! gotta try this!0
-
Which flavor are you using? Rich Chocolate or malt?
Okay my vote on the Malt flavor is in.. and it's lacking. The Rich Chocolate flavor is much better.0 -
Also try this if you crave starbucks, but don't want the calories, artificial everything, fat, carbohydrates, sugar, etc.
http://www.peanutbutterandpeppers.com/2012/06/18/skinny-vanilla-mocha-frappe/0 -
OMG!! I just made this. GIRL you were right on. It takes exactly like a mocha latte. At first I thought the Ovaltine was a little expensive then I realized its the cost of 2 Grande mocha. I just may be officially done with Starbucks!! Thanks again!
WoopWoop Yeaaaah!!:happy: I'm so glad you tried it and got those results too! I knew the powers had shifted when I was able to drive by a Starbucks and not feel the urge to get my mocha fix - because I'd already had it at home with zippo the cost and calories.0 -
Check out the ingredients in the powdered "creamer". I wouldn't call this a "healthier" alternative. Perhaps a less caloric one but certainly not "healthier".
I didn't think she was claiming it to be "healthy"
"Healthier" YES it IS - but no I didn't say it was "Healthy". Less calories is healthier on your body, less cost is healthier on your wallet. The drink however does have it's pros to your system as well as cons, it really all boils down to each individual persons health issues.
For example (and I am speaking from MY situation only)... if you have trouble with breathing for whatever reason, the caffeine in the drink can relax and open up your airways which can calm you down because you can breath... Too much of it though can spike your blood pressure in a naughty way and wind you up like a bouncing tick. Everything in moderation..
Bottom line - yes, it is a Healthier Alternative to the Starbucks Mocha Latte. :drinker:0 -
Thank you for posting this... However I would strongly recommend the use of real milk, or Almond or Coconut milk in the place of non dairy creamers. They are so unhealthy for you, and because your body doesn't even recognize them as food, they get stored as fat.
Read this:
http://bodyandhealth.canada.com/channel_section_details.asp?text_id=5709&channel_id=9&relation_id=26047
Also, be aware that at Starbucks you could get any latte nonfat, and also sugar free (although again be careful with Sugar free sweeteners) a Tall skinny latte is only 90 cals, grande 120 and venti 160.
I totally agree with you that using "real" milk would be better, however that is where the calories are packed and I was trying to cut that down. Also in the quest to find the closest substitution.. the Coffee-mate creamer hit best.
My system personally cannot handle any of the sugar-free or skinny drinks options (even in food).. as they make me feel sick very quickly. I opt for the raw sugar turbinado when I have to, but I'm not a big sweetner user. Thank you for your input though - I love stats!0 -
thanks!0
-
love it! gracias!0
-
I would have never thought to use Ovaltine. I have use Hershey's Cocoa and find it to be bitter. I think I will give this a try. Thanks!0
-
bump0
-
Sounds like a great idea! The only setback will be the lesser amount of caffeine you will be getting compared to the Sbux original (since mochas are espresso drinks, and espresso has more caffeine).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions