your food is killong you

Options
123457»

Replies

  • sizzle74
    sizzle74 Posts: 858 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    I hope he PM's me and shows me his weiner.
  • AlongCame_Molly
    AlongCame_Molly Posts: 2,835 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    Anything good?!??
  • Carnivor0us
    Carnivor0us Posts: 1,752 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    Really? I hope he PM's me and makes a comment about how overweight I look in my picture.
  • BeachIron
    BeachIron Posts: 6,490 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    Anything good?!??

    Angry rants of course. Very entertaining.
  • GormanGhaste
    GormanGhaste Posts: 430 Member
    Options
    BEWARE of drinking WATER, it contains the CHEMICAL H2O!
    Right? And never *ever* consume the chemical ascorbic acid, I'm sure it must be bad for you if you don't know anything about chemistry or biology!
  • wolverine66
    wolverine66 Posts: 3,779 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    Really? I hope he PM's me and makes a comment about how overweight I look in my picture.

    i hope he PMs me to show me all the scientific studies he has to back up such claims....


    though I won't hold my breath
  • wolverine66
    wolverine66 Posts: 3,779 Member
    Options
    and I hope he PMs me with kitty gifs. because cuteness
  • ITSSODAMNHOT
    ITSSODAMNHOT Posts: 121 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    I hope he PM's me and shows me his weiner.


    I'll show you mine 8===D #BOOM!
  • BeachGingerOnTheRocks
    BeachGingerOnTheRocks Posts: 3,927 Member
    Options
    Okay, OP has convinced me to avoid killong in my food. I've been trying to google it, but the search keeps sending me back to this thread. I don't even know which foods have killong in them. :sad:

    OP, don't PM me to insult me about having had cancer. Not cool.
  • AlongCame_Molly
    AlongCame_Molly Posts: 2,835 Member
    Options
    I think OP's feelings are hurt. He's PMing people. :sad:

    Really? I hope he PM's me and makes a comment about how overweight I look in my picture.

    I wan't going to say anything, but.... your scales are looking a little strained recently. Maybe try a 30 day pterodactyl ball-juice cleanse? I hear they are amazing for the claws.
  • debbieyoung96343405
    Options
    Good Grief!

    SO MUCH FOR THE MYTHS CONSIDER THE FACTS ON CARRAGEENAN FOR A CHANGE
    Q. What is Carrageenan??
    A. Carrageenan is a naturally-occurring seaweed extract. It is widely used in foods and non-foods to improve texture and stability. Common uses include meat and poultry, dairy products, canned pet food, cosmetics and toothpaste.
    Q. Why the controversy?
    A. Self-appointed consumer watchdogs have produced numerous web pages filled with words condemning carrageenan as an unsafe food additive for human consumption. However, in 70+ years of carrageenan being used in processed foods, not a single substantiated claim of an acute or chronic disease has been reported as arising from carrageenan consumption. On a more science-based footing, food regulatory agencies in the US, the EU, and in the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) repeatedly review and continue to approve carrageenan as a safe food additive.
    Q. What has led up to this misrepresentation of the safety of an important food stabilizer, gelling agent and thickener?
    A. It clearly has to be attributed to the research of Dr. Joanne Tobacman, an Associate Prof at the University of Illinois in Chicago. She and a group of molecular biologists have accused carrageenan of being a potential inflammatory agent as a conclusion from laboratory experiments with cells of the digestive tract. It requires a lot of unproven assumptions to even suggest that consumption of carrageenan in the human diet causes inflammatory diseases of the digestive tract. The objectivity of the Chicago research is also flawed by the fact that Dr Tobacman has tried to have carrageenan declared an unsafe food additive on weak technical arguments that she broadcast widely a decade before the University of Chicago research began.
    Q. What brings poligeenan into a discussion of carrageenan?
    A. Poligeenan (“degraded carrageenan” in pre-1988 scientific and regulatory publications) is a possible carcinogen to humans; carrageenan is not. The only relationship between carrageenan and poligeenan is that the former is the starting material to make the latter. Poligeenan is not a component of carrageenan and cannot be produced in the digestive tract from carrageenan-containing foods.
    Q. What are the differences between poligeenan and carrageenan?
    A. The production process for poligeenan requires treating carrageenan with strong acid at high temp (about that of boiling water) for 6 hours or more. These severe processing conditions convert the long chains of carrageenan to much shorter ones: ten to one hundred times shorter. In scientific terms the molecular weight of poligeenan is 10,000 to 20,000; whereas that of carrageenan is 200,000 to 800,000. Concern has been raised about the amount of material in carrageenan with molecular weight less than 50,000. The actual amount (well under 1%) cannot even be detected accurately with current technology. Certainly it presents no threat to human health.
    Q. What is the importance of these molecular weight differences?
    A. Poligeenan contains a fraction of material low enough in molecular weight that it can penetrate the walls of the digestive tract and enter the blood stream. The molecular weight of carrageenan is high enough that this penetration is impossible. Animal feeding studies starting in the 1960s have demonstrated that once the low molecular weight fraction of poligeenan enters the blood stream in large enough amounts, pre-cancerous lesions begin to form. These lesions are not observed in animals fed with a food containing carrageenan.
    Q. Does carrageenan get absorbed in the digestive track?
    A. Carrageenan passes through the digestive system intact, much like food fiber. In fact, carrageenan is a combination of soluble and insoluble nutritional fiber, though its use level in foods is so low as not to be a significant source of fiber in the diet.
    Summary
    Carrageenan has been proven completely safe for consumption. Poligeenan is not a component of carrageenan.
    Closing Remarks
    The consumer watchdogs with their blogs and websites would do far more service to consumers by researching their sources and present only what can be substantiated by good science. Unfortunately we are in an era of media frenzy that rewards controversy.
    Additional information available:
    On June 11th, 2008, Dr. Joanne Tobacman petitioned the FDA to revoke the current regulations permitting use of carrageenan as a food additive.
    On June 11th, 2012 the FDA denied her petition, categorically addressing and ultimately dismissing all of her claims; their rebuttal supported by the results of several in-depth, scientific studies.
    If you would like to read the full petition and FDA response, they can be accessed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!searchResults;rpp=25;po=0;s=FDA-2008-P-0347
  • 37434958
    37434958 Posts: 457 Member
    Options
    I know dat. Tanks for telling me again.
  • AngelicxAnnihilation
    AngelicxAnnihilation Posts: 336 Member
    Options
    Going to have to read this later. In the mean time, Your, killing, and punctuation is always nice.* :flowerforyou:
  • extraordinary_machine
    extraordinary_machine Posts: 3,028 Member
    Options
    Good Grief!

    SO MUCH FOR THE MYTHS CONSIDER THE FACTS ON CARRAGEENAN FOR A CHANGE
    Q. What is Carrageenan??
    A. Carrageenan is a naturally-occurring seaweed extract. It is widely used in foods and non-foods to improve texture and stability. Common uses include meat and poultry, dairy products, canned pet food, cosmetics and toothpaste.
    Q. Why the controversy?
    A. Self-appointed consumer watchdogs have produced numerous web pages filled with words condemning carrageenan as an unsafe food additive for human consumption. However, in 70+ years of carrageenan being used in processed foods, not a single substantiated claim of an acute or chronic disease has been reported as arising from carrageenan consumption. On a more science-based footing, food regulatory agencies in the US, the EU, and in the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) repeatedly review and continue to approve carrageenan as a safe food additive.
    Q. What has led up to this misrepresentation of the safety of an important food stabilizer, gelling agent and thickener?
    A. It clearly has to be attributed to the research of Dr. Joanne Tobacman, an Associate Prof at the University of Illinois in Chicago. She and a group of molecular biologists have accused carrageenan of being a potential inflammatory agent as a conclusion from laboratory experiments with cells of the digestive tract. It requires a lot of unproven assumptions to even suggest that consumption of carrageenan in the human diet causes inflammatory diseases of the digestive tract. The objectivity of the Chicago research is also flawed by the fact that Dr Tobacman has tried to have carrageenan declared an unsafe food additive on weak technical arguments that she broadcast widely a decade before the University of Chicago research began.
    Q. What brings poligeenan into a discussion of carrageenan?
    A. Poligeenan (“degraded carrageenan” in pre-1988 scientific and regulatory publications) is a possible carcinogen to humans; carrageenan is not. The only relationship between carrageenan and poligeenan is that the former is the starting material to make the latter. Poligeenan is not a component of carrageenan and cannot be produced in the digestive tract from carrageenan-containing foods.
    Q. What are the differences between poligeenan and carrageenan?
    A. The production process for poligeenan requires treating carrageenan with strong acid at high temp (about that of boiling water) for 6 hours or more. These severe processing conditions convert the long chains of carrageenan to much shorter ones: ten to one hundred times shorter. In scientific terms the molecular weight of poligeenan is 10,000 to 20,000; whereas that of carrageenan is 200,000 to 800,000. Concern has been raised about the amount of material in carrageenan with molecular weight less than 50,000. The actual amount (well under 1%) cannot even be detected accurately with current technology. Certainly it presents no threat to human health.
    Q. What is the importance of these molecular weight differences?
    A. Poligeenan contains a fraction of material low enough in molecular weight that it can penetrate the walls of the digestive tract and enter the blood stream. The molecular weight of carrageenan is high enough that this penetration is impossible. Animal feeding studies starting in the 1960s have demonstrated that once the low molecular weight fraction of poligeenan enters the blood stream in large enough amounts, pre-cancerous lesions begin to form. These lesions are not observed in animals fed with a food containing carrageenan.
    Q. Does carrageenan get absorbed in the digestive track?
    A. Carrageenan passes through the digestive system intact, much like food fiber. In fact, carrageenan is a combination of soluble and insoluble nutritional fiber, though its use level in foods is so low as not to be a significant source of fiber in the diet.
    Summary
    Carrageenan has been proven completely safe for consumption. Poligeenan is not a component of carrageenan.
    Closing Remarks
    The consumer watchdogs with their blogs and websites would do far more service to consumers by researching their sources and present only what can be substantiated by good science. Unfortunately we are in an era of media frenzy that rewards controversy.
    Additional information available:
    On June 11th, 2008, Dr. Joanne Tobacman petitioned the FDA to revoke the current regulations permitting use of carrageenan as a food additive.
    On June 11th, 2012 the FDA denied her petition, categorically addressing and ultimately dismissing all of her claims; their rebuttal supported by the results of several in-depth, scientific studies.
    If you would like to read the full petition and FDA response, they can be accessed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!searchResults;rpp=25;po=0;s=FDA-2008-P-0347

    *kitten*-sphincter says what??
  • iAMsmiling
    iAMsmiling Posts: 2,394 Member
    Options
    Okay, OP has convinced me to avoid killong in my food. I've been trying to google it, but the search keeps sending me back to this thread. I don't even know which foods have killong in them. :sad:

    OP, don't PM me to insult me about having had cancer. Not cool.


    Please, tell me he didn't do that!
  • wolverine66
    wolverine66 Posts: 3,779 Member
    Options
    Good Grief!

    SO MUCH FOR THE MYTHS CONSIDER THE FACTS ON CARRAGEENAN FOR A CHANGE

    what are these "facts" you speak of? i thought people just say words and others automatically believe those words...
  • JaneDough_
    JaneDough_ Posts: 301 Member
    Options
    1341250568_baby_alpaca_falling_asleep.gif

    funny-gif-rabbit-bunny-falling-asleep.gif
  • jofjltncb6
    jofjltncb6 Posts: 34,415 Member
    Options
    Also, what is going on in this thread? It's just weird. OP makes a "ALIENS" post, people refute. OP gets pissy, and then does some body shaming, and then rage-quit-threatens, and then gifs commence. And tequila. Always the tequila.


    I do synopses.

    I wish we could vote certain posts up to appear earlier in the thread. Would have saved me from reading all six pages.

    (Nah, I'm kidding...I still would have read them...

    ...because train wreck.)
  • Babeskeez
    Babeskeez Posts: 606 Member
    Options
    best thread ever.
  • Alex
    Alex Posts: 10,149 MFP Staff
    Options
    Dear Posters,

    I have locked this topic; it appears that much of the replies are a violation of our community guidelines and I want to take this opportunity to respectfully remind posters of our community guidelines. It is not acceptable to mock a person's spelling or grammar. It is not permissible to attack users and make rude comments about their photos. It is not permissible to troll a topic by posting funny images or even just posting "in for the lock" messages. Rather than contribute to the decline of a thread, please contribute constructively to a topic or move on without posting and report posts that are violations of our community guidelines.

    The forum guidelines include these items:

    1. No Attacks or Insults and No Reciprocation

    a) Do not attack, mock, or otherwise insult others. You can respectfully disagree with the message or topic, but you cannot attack the messenger. This includes attacks against the user’s spelling or command of written English, or belittling a user for posting a duplicate topic.
    b) If you are attacked by another user, and you reciprocate, you will also be subject to the same consequences. Defending yourself or a friend is not an excuse! Do not take matters into your own hands – instead, use the Report Post link to report an attack and we will be happy to handle the situation for you.

    2. No Hi-Jacking, Trolling, or Flame-baiting
    Please stay on-topic within a forum topic. Off-topic or derogatory remarks are disrespectful. Please either contribute politely and constructively to a topic, or move on without posting. This includes posts that encourage the drama in a topic to escalate, or posts intended to incite an uproar from the community.

    If you would like to review the forum guidelines, please visit the following link:

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines

    At our discretion, this locked thread may be deleted entirely in the near future.

    With respect,
    Olivia
    MyFitnessPal Community Manager
This discussion has been closed.