BMR QUESTION

Options
djwife03
djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
edited January 24 in Fitness and Exercise
I went to Scoobysworkshop and it gave me a BMR of 1521. my profile currently is at 1650. so, should i change it to 1521?

Replies

  • It really depends on your muscle to fat ratio. It takes far more calories to maintain muscle.
  • caly_man
    caly_man Posts: 281 Member
    all calculators are estimate, try a couple more to see what you get

    http://www.fat2fitradio.com/tools/bmr/

    http://www.fitnessfrog.com/calculators.html
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,837 Member
    With only eight pounds to lose? NO. Set your calorie goal at your TDEE minus 10%. And if you are using the outside calculators, you don't eat back exercise cals.


    It will likely be between 1700-2200 depending on your activity level. But just keep it simple. So just stick with MFP's recommendations...you're at 1650? Is that with the setting at "Lose 1/2 pound per week?"


    Just use MFP's settings for "Lose 1/2 pound per week" and do NOT use "Sedentary". Sedentary is set a little too low on this site. Use Lightly Active or more.


    edit because I can't type.
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    i tried both sites and get 1521 for my BMR. My TDEE is 2314, and less 20% is 1851. So, is the 1851 what I should use for my daily calorie intake to lose weight , or isit the 1521? I workout 4 days a week. I do various things, but normally burn 450-500cals each workout. I am doing the 30 day shred right now, and the 6 week ab workout by JM. I also walk/jog, ride a recumbent bike, lift weights.
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    yes, I used MFP, and did 1/2 pound per week, and I did have it set at sedentary....because i have a desk job. I reset it to lightly active just now, and it gave me 1810 cals/day! so, using this, I don't have to eat back my exercise cals? this is where i get confused and feel stupid!
  • georgina1970
    georgina1970 Posts: 333 Member
    TDEE minus 10% is the way to go :-)
    You need that energy to maintain your muscle mass while loosing the remaining bodyfat.
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    so with TDEE - 20% i dont' have to worry about eating back my exercise cals?
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,837 Member
    yes, I used MFP, and did 1/2 pound per week, and I did have it set at sedentary....because i have a desk job. I reset it to lightly active just now, and it gave me 1810 cals/day! so, using this, I don't have to eat back my exercise cals? this is where i get confused and feel stupid!


    I understand your confusion, so....


    Use MFP's method (which is really the same thing). Add in and eat the extra calories you "earn" with exercise. That is how this site is intended to be used. Eat the 1810 AND the extra exercise calories when you do planned exercise.






    IF you go off-site and do your calculations with another calculator and go with TDEE minus 10% (DON'T use 20%, that is for people with a lot of weight to lose.) ...so IF you use TDEE minus 10%, do NOT eat back exercise calories. Two different methods. Just use MFP. It works, it's easy, no maths for you to do.

    Use Lightly Active. Trust me. I've been on this site since 2007. Just try it. :flowerforyou:


    .
  • TomTomato
    TomTomato Posts: 223
    When you include the activity in your TDEE category, it already figures in the exercise. So you wouldn't eat any additional cals. Since I have a desk job and my activity varies, I use the "sedentary" number and track exercise cals separately. The I try to eat back about 2/3 of the activity cals. It's only about 2/3 because you have to subtract the calories that would have been burned "sedentary" that were replaced by the activity cals and deduct the 20%, or whatever reduction from TDEE you are using.
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    ok, I'm so sorry but when you say add in the cals I earn with exercise......so if I'm set at 1810, and excercise and burn 450, then I should eat around 2200 cals/day?
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    and if that's the case, I need help with getting all those cals in! I am having a hard enough time at 1650!
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,837 Member
    ok, I'm so sorry but when you say add in the cals I earn with exercise......so if I'm set at 1810, and excercise and burn 450, then I should eat around 2200 cals/day?

    Yes. That is the way this site is intended to be used. It worked for me. Other people may argue that point.

    For now, try slowly getting your intake up to 1810. Hold there for a couple weeks...reevaluate. You don't want to just jump from 1650 to 2200 all at once. 1810 will likely be too low over time, but start with that.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    ok, I'm so sorry but when you say add in the cals I earn with exercise......so if I'm set at 1810, and excercise and burn 450, then I should eat around 2200 cals/day?

    Yes. That is the way this site is intended to be used. It worked for me. Other people may argue that point.

    For now, try slowly getting your intake up to 1810. Hold there for a couple weeks...reevaluate. You don't want to just jump from 1650 to 2200 all at once. 1810 will likely be too low over time, but start with that.

    Just to reiterate...yes

    MFP is a NEAT method (Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis) calculator...exercise is extra activity.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,837 Member
    And, just to add to cwolfman's point...this site uses the Mifflin St Joer calculator. So the numbers are significantly different than other calculators which do not expect you to keep track of daily additional exercise.

    This site is more exact and more accurate IF IT IS USED THE WAY IT IS INTENDED TO BE USED.

    With only eight pounds to lose, it is going to be extremely slow going. Don't try to rush the process, you'll be shooting yourself in the foot. EAT!!
  • bacitracin
    bacitracin Posts: 921 Member
    The I try to eat back about 2/3 of the activity cals. It's only about 2/3 because you have to subtract the calories that would have been burned "sedentary" that were replaced by the activity cals and deduct the 20%, or whatever reduction from TDEE you are using.

    I dunno what you're using, but the treadmill and ellipticals I use don't count a burn of you standing still. The number they give you is on top of the calories you would have burned standing still.

    And even then, I burn 800 calories in an hour running, without getting out of breath, easy. What would I have burned, maybe 90 to 100 in an hour, sitting on the couch? 700 is hardly 2/3 of 800, lol. If I can burn 15 calories a minute exercising (well, I CAN burn more, but let's just keep it this way for reference) and I burn 1.5 calories a minute asleep... that's 10%. Not 67%.
  • djwife03
    djwife03 Posts: 333 Member
    Thanks all! I just might get the hang of this yet! With your help, of course! Lol
  • ehsan517
    ehsan517 Posts: 114
    simplified way to see it:

    forget BMR...calculate TDEE. once you know that, eat at a 10% deficit for healthy fat loss and muscle retention.
    do not do all that complicated stuff like eating back calories/tracking calories burned on treadmil and what not. all that is already integrated into the estimated tdee when its calculated. see if that works for a while.
    i can always tell when TDEEs are wrong. if i follow em for a week and im completely flat and feeling weak, then i know i got my calories wrong. i just up it by a 100 for a week and see results and repeat the process until im at a state where i can burn fat and maintain muscle.
    bottom line, dont complicate stuff with eating back and all that jazz....remember: you body DOES NOT count grams and calories the simple way we presume it does.
  • ernestbecker
    ernestbecker Posts: 232 Member
    It's all about getting to know your body. As several said, BMR's & TDEE's are estimates and using those numbers as a starting base for a week or two, and then adjusting up or down based on what you're seeing and how you're feeling. The good news is, that none of this happens over night so time gets to be your friend as you dial things in!
  • KAYRRIE
    KAYRRIE Posts: 201 Member
    yes, I used MFP, and did 1/2 pound per week, and I did have it set at sedentary....because i have a desk job. I reset it to lightly active just now, and it gave me 1810 cals/day! so, using this, I don't have to eat back my exercise cals? this is where i get confused and feel stupid!

    I did MFP's and it set me up at 1900 per day, which I brought down to 1800 for the just in case. If I work out, I do eat at least half of those calories back because let's say I burned 500 like you do, that will technically bring my number down to 1300 and my numbers at 1800 are already set to nourish yet still loose weight. So definitely just look at your net calories you take in after working out and go from there.
  • KAYRRIE
    KAYRRIE Posts: 201 Member
    And, just to add to cwolfman's point...this site uses the Mifflin St Joer calculator. So the numbers are significantly different than other calculators which do not expect you to keep track of daily additional exercise.

    This site is more exact and more accurate IF IT IS USED THE WAY IT IS INTENDED TO BE USED.

    With only eight pounds to lose, it is going to be extremely slow going. Don't try to rush the process, you'll be shooting yourself in the foot. EAT!!

    I've researced other sites too and this one does lend to being more accurate just because you can add the workouts individually where some other sites (not all) do a general idea of how much you will burn during the week. It took a few weeks but I was able to figure out just the right number for me right now. I may have to adjust in the future but for now it's been working just fine.
  • KAYRRIE
    KAYRRIE Posts: 201 Member
    ok, I'm so sorry but when you say add in the cals I earn with exercise......so if I'm set at 1810, and excercise and burn 450, then I should eat around 2200 cals/day?

    I know it looks scary to eat 2200 per day if you workout but this is how you have to look at it. If you're set at 1810 and you burn 500 today, you will technically only be eating 1310 if you don't eat back those you burned. Your calories here are set up for you to loose weight already even if you don't work out alot.
This discussion has been closed.