not your normal exercise calories question
shipleyak
Posts: 65 Member
OK so I went canoeing yesterday. The batabase estimated 1700 calories were burned doing that. I don't get how I burned that much my heart rate never seriously increased but I was starving afterwards. Any ideas if this estimate is right or is it off if my HR stayed low?
0
Replies
-
I guess it would have to depend on how har dyou were canoeing, were you paddleing a lot or just floating down the river? You can expend energy without really increasing your HR a lot...imagine if you were walkinga t aslow pace for hours...you'd still burn calories regardless of if your heart really got pounding or not.
It could be a bit high, but I wouldnt be suprised if it was close. if you're worried about it, only eat back half of the calories it says you burned, then you'll be on the safer side.0 -
Totally off topic:
Are you REALLY 31? You SERIOUSLY look about 17!!
I kayak a lot and I find that even tho I don't stress or get my heart rate up there, I am still paddling enough to get my 200+ pound body around the lake/pond as well as the weight of my 14' kayak. So, I would figure it's pretty close, but like Funk4Life mentioned, just eat back about 1/2 your exercise calories back.
:bigsmile:0 -
According to another calorie counter I have, for 30 minutes of rowing in a canoe for pleasure you burn about 156 calories. It's going off a generalization of age, weight, etc, but it might give you an idea of what you might have burned!0
-
My list of METs for canoeing lists several different levels, so it could be very accurate or it could be really off. It reads the following:
Light Effort (2.0 to 3.9 mph) = 3 calories per kilogram of bodyweight per hour
Moderate Effort (4.0 to 5.9 mph) = 7 calories per kilogram of bodyweight per hour
Vigorous Effort (>6 mph) = 12 calories per kilogram of bodyweight per hour
For Pleasure (no speed listed) = 3.5 calories per kilogram of bodyweight per hour
In Competition = 12 calories per kilogram of bodyweight per hour
So, to figure your calorie burn you'd have to figure your weight in kilograms and pick which classification you think you did. I can't see your stats so I'm going to estimate with a standard 70 kg, which is 154 pounds. If you want to find your weight in kg from pounds, just divide the pounds by 2.2 to get kg. So, with a light effort, it would be 70 kg x 3METs = 210 calories per hour, x the 3 hours you did would be 630 calories. If you were to pick a moderate effort, which is what you have it listed as then it would be 70kg x 7METs = 490 calories per hour x 3 hours = 1470. If you had picked Vigorous effort, then it would be 70kg x 12METs = 840 calories per hour x 3 hours = 2520 calories. Obviously, those will change based on your weight, so plug in your numbers. But that should show how the numbers can change based on effort and give you a way of figuring it.0 -
Thank you all for your advice My body is feeling it so I must have worked harder then I thought. We only did 6 miles but I was rowing the whole time. Guess I won't worry to much about it. Ohh and yes I am really 31. I get that alot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions