What is IIFYM?

SideSteel
SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
Recently there's been an increase in threads where someone posts about IIFYM with the assumption that IIFYM is a specific calorie or macronutrient setting.

This is happening because one of the websites promoting IIFYM also includes a calorie estimation tool and recommended macronutrient settings.

I'm only posting here to clarify some misconceptions at to what IIFYM actually is. I'm well aware that this has been done several times before on MFP but I'm doing it again because of the recent stream of threads that seemingly claim that IIFYM is a certain number of calories.

Suffice it to say, it's a philosophy about food selection and the strategy of looking at the diet as a whole rather than at individual food items.

You can read more here:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/817188-iifym
«13

Replies

  • ILiftHeavyAcrylics
    ILiftHeavyAcrylics Posts: 27,732 Member
    tagging
  • MyChocolateDiet
    MyChocolateDiet Posts: 22,281 Member
    I'm gonna put this on my wall bookmarks if you don't mind?
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    I'm gonna put this on my wall bookmarks if you don't mind?

    I don't mind at all =)
  • RunFarLiveHappy
    RunFarLiveHappy Posts: 805 Member
    Love this thread. I've also read the first one that you linked. It's a common problem of: if I don't monitor my nutrition the way you do I'm obviously doing to wrong which is a common reaction that I get from many people. I've had my best successes during my journey since I really started researching what macro settings will help me achieve my goals. I justify my ice cream by adding my protein powder. If I can meet my macro goals with a majority of nutrient dense foods and I worked my butt off I definitely earned my ice cream. Thanks for a great post.
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    I ingested fairly young mussels.
  • ILiftHeavyAcrylics
    ILiftHeavyAcrylics Posts: 27,732 Member
    I ingested fairly young mussels.

    :laugh:
  • soysauce6626
    soysauce6626 Posts: 118 Member
    i love flexible dieting. BRB fitting a beer or 2 in my diet.
  • BikerGirlElaine
    BikerGirlElaine Posts: 1,631 Member
    bump so it's on my feed
  • aakaakaak
    aakaakaak Posts: 1,240 Member
    i love flexible dieting. BRB fitting a beer or 2 in my diet.

    I did that last night actually. Believe it or not, I've used one as a protein gram to put myself on a good number before. That's so fun when the numbers work out perfectly like that.
  • sun_fish
    sun_fish Posts: 864 Member
    Bump
  • mjpbgtd
    mjpbgtd Posts: 115 Member
    Tagging
  • If It Fits Your Mouth

    EAT IT
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    But do you have an IIFYM shirt SS? :tongue:
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    But do you have an IIFYM shirt SS? :tongue:

    No.













    Not yet anyways.






















    YOu?
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    I sure do. Most people have no idea WTF it means though. I did get a few comments at powerlifting nationals though :laugh:
  • nomeejerome
    nomeejerome Posts: 2,616 Member
    tag
  • michael1976_ca
    michael1976_ca Posts: 3,488 Member
    thank you op for posting this
  • tmpecus78
    tmpecus78 Posts: 1,206 Member
    IIFYM for life! :drinker:
  • NonnyMary
    NonnyMary Posts: 982 Member
    Recently there's been an increase in threads where someone posts about IIFYM with the assumption that IIFYM is a specific calorie or macronutrient setting.

    This is happening because one of the websites promoting IIFYM also includes a calorie estimation tool and recommended macronutrient settings.

    I'm only posting here to clarify some misconceptions at to what IIFYM actually is. I'm well aware that this has been done several times before on MFP but I'm doing it again because of the recent stream of threads that seemingly claim that IIFYM is a certain number of calories.

    Suffice it to say, it's a philosophy about food selection and the strategy of looking at the diet as a whole rather than at individual food items.

    You can read more here:
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/817188-iifym

    I read your link. If I am understanding it right, seems like IIFYM was a concept that made sense, but people decided to interpret it in a way that they get a loophole that they think they can fill with junk food. I personally do not agree with the ones who spend most of their allowances majorly on junk food, as far as nutrition goes, I think they are fooling themselves. Yes they might be able to get away with it, but it will affect the body in a negative way. Now I do believe we can allow some junk food - MAYBE - but rarely, and more as an exception rather the rule to follow good health.
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    But do you have an IIFYM shirt SS? :tongue:


    In and the question is does he even own a shirt?
  • rhondaec
    rhondaec Posts: 85 Member
    bump for later
  • tmpecus78
    tmpecus78 Posts: 1,206 Member
    Recently there's been an increase in threads where someone posts about IIFYM with the assumption that IIFYM is a specific calorie or macronutrient setting.

    This is happening because one of the websites promoting IIFYM also includes a calorie estimation tool and recommended macronutrient settings.

    I'm only posting here to clarify some misconceptions at to what IIFYM actually is. I'm well aware that this has been done several times before on MFP but I'm doing it again because of the recent stream of threads that seemingly claim that IIFYM is a certain number of calories.

    Suffice it to say, it's a philosophy about food selection and the strategy of looking at the diet as a whole rather than at individual food items.

    You can read more here:
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/817188-iifym

    I read your link. If I am understanding it right, seems like IIFYM was a concept that made sense, but people decided to interpret it in a way that they get a loophole that they think they can fill with junk food. I personally do not agree with the ones who spend most of their allowances majorly on junk food, as far as nutrition goes, I think they are fooling themselves. Yes they might be able to get away with it, but it will affect the body in a negative way. Now I do believe we can allow some junk food - MAYBE - but rarely, and more as an exception rather the rule to follow good health.

    The one interpreting it wrong is you. IIFYM'er do not solely consume "junk food " like you are assuming. It's not all pizza, ice cream and Swiss cake rolls. We IIFYm'er have learned to control and keep track of our macros, and save calories for foods we enjoy like bacon and pop tarts. Having a pop tart and bacon daily does not make me unhealthy like u are stating above. I'm 35 and in the best shape of my life and have no health related issues do to my eating. While others are starving themselves to drop weight, I'm sitting back eating ice cream and going to bed full and happy and waking up lean.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    It's amazing how many people seem to think you 'have' to eat poptarts all day to follow IIFYM.

    What people do not realize also is that you can apply IIFYM to other dietary choices. For example, vegetarian, low carb etc etc. You just set your macros or pick your food choices according to those dietary choices.
  • tmpecus78
    tmpecus78 Posts: 1,206 Member
    It's amazing how many people seem to think you 'have' to eat poptarts all day to follow IIFYM.

    What people do not realize also is that you can apply IIFYM to other dietary choices. For example, vegetarian, low carb etc etc. You just set your macros or pick your food choices according to those dietary choices.

    THIS! But I do want to eat pop-tarts all day :love:
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Recently there's been an increase in threads where someone posts about IIFYM with the assumption that IIFYM is a specific calorie or macronutrient setting.

    This is happening because one of the websites promoting IIFYM also includes a calorie estimation tool and recommended macronutrient settings.

    I'm only posting here to clarify some misconceptions at to what IIFYM actually is. I'm well aware that this has been done several times before on MFP but I'm doing it again because of the recent stream of threads that seemingly claim that IIFYM is a certain number of calories.

    Suffice it to say, it's a philosophy about food selection and the strategy of looking at the diet as a whole rather than at individual food items.

    You can read more here:
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/817188-iifym

    I read your link. If I am understanding it right, seems like IIFYM was a concept that made sense, but people decided to interpret it in a way that they get a loophole that they think they can fill with junk food. I personally do not agree with the ones who spend most of their allowances majorly on junk food, as far as nutrition goes, I think they are fooling themselves. Yes they might be able to get away with it, but it will affect the body in a negative way. Now I do believe we can allow some junk food - MAYBE - but rarely, and more as an exception rather the rule to follow good health.

    I do not think people actually interpret it in a way that they have a 'loophole'. You will find very few people actually eating junk food all day and actually managing to hit their macros. What you will find is people eating food that includes 'junk' food (whatever that is based on your definition) but also eating whole foods. Now, the amount of 'junk' i.e less nutrient dense foods v nutrient dense foods will vary, but much of that, assuming they are applying IIFYM correctly will depend on your calorie allowance.

    If I am on say 1,500 calories, I have less 'wiggle room' for pop tarts if I am to hit my macros, hit my fiber and get a few servings of fruits and veggies in. If I am on say 2,500, then there is far more room for latitude in my food choices.

    There are very few foods that are bad for you (medical conditions aside)...just ones that are less nutrient dense.
  • magerum
    magerum Posts: 12,589 Member
    It's amazing how many people seem to think you 'have' to eat poptarts all day to follow IIFYM.

    What people do not realize also is that you can apply IIFYM to other dietary choices. For example, vegetarian, low carb etc etc. You just set your macros or pick your food choices according to those dietary choices.

    THIS! But I do want to eat pop-tarts all day :love:

    Back in for all day pop tarts.


    To further demonstrate Sara's point in a previous post...on my cut diet of 3,000 I easily have room for my 440 calories (pint of slow churned) ice cream every night. While hitting (crushing) my macro and micro needs. That's a commonly over looked issue, context of total calories and diet.
  • tmpecus78
    tmpecus78 Posts: 1,206 Member

    Back in for all day pop tarts.


    To further demonstrate Sara's point in a previous post...on my cut diet of 3,000 I easily have room for my 440 calories (pint of slow churned) ice cream every night. While hitting (crushing) my macro and micro needs. That's a commonly over looked issue, context of total calories and diet.

    Jelly :love: I'm still in cutting mode, so my macros are a bit lower. But I do get a re-feed day every fourth day and I go crazy lol
  • Iron_Feline
    Iron_Feline Posts: 10,750 Member
    Bumping to put on my wall. I love IIFYM. :love:
  • Microfiber
    Microfiber Posts: 956 Member
    I've never eaten a poptart. Am I missing out? :laugh:
  • bound4beauty
    bound4beauty Posts: 274 Member
    I love poptarts but haven't had one in years. It's hard to get them to fit your macros when your goal is 1600 calories and 125 grams of carbs. If I were bulking or doing a re-feed? Hell yeah I'd eat some poptarts. Yum!