Would you pose nude

nah, playgirl is only posing, id rather do action shots....

Yes, I would. I had trouble accepting my body for so long. Now I love it to pieces, and I would have the courage to go blank...

If it were for something such as an art class, I probably would. But I don't think I could for something that would be widely curculated, such as a magazine. Even if I get to my goal body.

Of course, I am sure there would probably be a price point that could change my mind lol

If it were for something such as an art class, I probably would. But I don't think I could for something that would be widely curculated, such as a magazine. Even if I get to my goal body.

Of course, I am sure there would probably be a price point that could change my mind lol

everyone has a price...some are just cheaper than others....

For sure. I need the money.

Sure! Bodies are nothing to be ashamed of! =]

Never for a magazine or related companies but i have posed nude for a "real men don't rape" campaign....
Friend me who knows you may get pics..:flowerforyou:

I would!! You live only once

twice if you believe in reincarnation

Yes. It would be a lot less demeaning than some of the legit jobs I've had. :laugh:

No. Prostitution in whatever form is wrong. It demeans all parties.

Huh? This thread is about prostitution? I obviously cannot read.

At least the poster you quoted doesn't think those who pose for Playboy are sluts. . . just prostitutes, apparently. . . or something.

On topic: Would I pose nude? Yep. It's a body. If someone can explain to me why wearing the same amount of clothes I had when I came into this world for a picture is somehow immoral, I'll be impressed.

yes (have done, do do, and will do) and yes

Yes I would....still waiting for playgirl to call me :laugh:

No. Prostitution in whatever form is wrong. It demeans all parties.

Sad that people see posing nude as prostitution...I've modeled for art class, in no way shape or form am I a prostitute. I am comfortable with my body, and have no hangups regarding other people's bodies.

You cannot compare posing for art class as the same as posing for Playboy.

Why is photography not art? Last time I checked it was. So is the use of an airbrush. Even if I don't agree with the use of airbrush or Photoshop on nudes. Either way its art. As an artist I must defend art, and your insinuation that nude models are *kitten* is a direct attack on artists and their subjects. For every great work of art that is created there are thousands of pieces of mindless garbage not worth the paper its printed on. Without that smut, trash, or whatever other label you wanna put on it. We would never get the diamonds in the rough that are know as our collective great works of art.

Belittling art in any form, belittles all art in all forms.

Robt Mapplethorpe & his brethren belittled art. He was especially one nasty piece of work. Throwing feces on a wall or exhibiting a crucifix in a jar of urine is not art. It is an attack on others and meant to be offensive.

Seems you are expanding on the definition of art. Many deviants have hid their objectionable proclivities behind the veil of art.

Ive found that the truth is simple & when lot of words or complex explanations is involved, one is entering the area of dishonesty.

BTW - I think Playboy photos are beautiful, but let's be honest about what it really is and the intent. It is what it is and I dont owe anyone an explanation nor need to camouflage.

So tell; What is the difference between the marketing of sexual gratification and creating art?

Of course I would! I believe if you have it flaunt it!!

new t-shirt saying... "Have crotch, will pose!"

Done and done.