The Best Breakfast for Weight Loss
Replies
-
I really enjoyed this article. Thanks for sharing. I too notice when I eat more calories in the morning instead of the evening, I lose better.0
-
First of all, this very small study doesn't say that their research was carried out in a controlled environment where the test subjects were monitored 24 hours a day and what they ate was prepared for them. Instead, like so many studies they probably relied on the subjects keeping journals and trusted them to be accurate.
Also in the article is says this "But that doesn’t mean that starting your day with a 700-calorie Cronut will automatically help you lose weight. Instead, shoot for a large, balanced meal that’s high in protein—like eggs, yogurt, or lean meat—to fend off hunger."
This quote from the article makes way more sense. The reason that people tend to eat less when they start the day with a hearty breakfast is because they remain satiated longer and are better able to control their calorie intake for the rest of the day.
There are plenty of people who are successful doing all kinds of things, including skipping breakfast entirely.
What bothers me about all of these studies is that they are very rarely conducted on enough subjects and are very rarely done under controlled circumstances so are really more anecdotal then evidence based and they then get published in a magazine as the next best thing. It's not proof of anything.
Everyone has to do what works for them. If eating a big breakfast helps you meet your calorie and macro goals for the day then by all means Eat breakfast like a king and eat dinner like a pauper. Remember that saying?
But, you may go to bed hungry in which case your sleep will most likely not be quality and you'll struggle with sleep deprivation which has been proven to be a contributor to obesity and poor health in general. Your choice. I'm just saying that this tiny study doesn't prove anything.
I completely agree.
I've structured my meals all different ways. I seem to do best with a smallish breakfast, smallish lunch, and lots of calories for after dinner snacking. The most important factor is being able to stick to your calorie goal.0 -
The article suggests eating half your daily cals at breakfast?! There is no way that would work for me. I eat a tiny breakfast because I am not hungry in the morning - I usually have to force myself to eat. I like to save calories for a larger dinner (large being relative when you are eating 1200 calories a day) and a fudgsicle before bed. And I'm losing the weight, no problem. As someone above pointed out, each person should do whatever it is that works for them . If you are good eating half your daily calories in the morning and can get through your day, more power to you. I happen to get hungrier as the day goes on, so I wouldn't lose any weight eating like this. Really, as long as you are eating at a caloric deficit it shouldn't matter what time you eat.0
-
Coffee.0
-
What ever breakfast is geared most towards keeping you in calorie deficit.
On work days I eat breakfast at 5:30am. On non work days I might not eat breakfast/lunch until noon.
As long as at the end of the day I'm under my maintenance calories, I will lose weight.0 -
NONE0
-
I lost 50lbs without ever eating breakfast at all :drinker:
Awesome.....breakfast (BREAK-FAST) hint hint....just makes most people eat more throughout the day0 -
I like to keep my breakfast very light but nutritious! I often drink a huge glass of green juice every single day in the morning. It keeps you full too!0
-
I use to live by the rule: If I eat in the morning, I am hungry all day. If I wait until I am hungry, I will eat less.
I have since found out on my weight loss journey that the first part is correct. If I eat in the morning I AM hungry all day, and that is a good thing. I have had much more luck starting early with a good wholesome breakfast and then eating every two to three hours after that.
If I skip breakfast, I very easily fall back in to my own 400+ pound eating habits: No Breakfast, Big Lunch, Big Dinner, plus who knows how many extra calories I eat while staring in the fridge and pantry grazing...
It is much easier for me to start early and map out my day. That way when I get hungry I can tell my self it is only XX minutes until my next snack.0 -
I use to live by the rule: If I eat in the morning, I am hungry all day. If I wait until I am hungry, I will eat less.
I have since found out on my weight loss journey that the first part is correct. If I eat in the morning I AM hungry all day, and that is a good thing. I have had much more luck starting early with a good wholesome breakfast and then eating every two to three hours after that.
If I skip breakfast, I very easily fall back in to my own 400+ pound eating habits: No Breakfast, Big Lunch, Big Dinner, plus who knows how many extra calories I eat while staring in the fridge and pantry grazing...
It is much easier for me to start early and map out my day. That way when I get hungry I can tell my self it is only XX minutes until my next snack.
Sounds like an eating disorder to me (Not an insult) - but eating every 2-3 hours is practically borderline eating disorder and counting down minutes for a snack.0 -
Eating the biggest meal in the morning or at night doesn't affect weight loss. It's all calories in vs. calories out.
If you are hungry in the morning, eat more. If you are not, don't eat. It doesn't have to be one way or other.0 -
That has been debunked. I've always had dinner as my biggest meal and it has never hindered my weight loss. Meal timing is just another gimmick to sell diet books. You can eat before bed, you can eat IN bed and at the end of the day it's all about the deficit you create.
This seems like a recent study in a scientific journal. How could it have been debunked already? It may not have hindered your weight loss, but maybe it will be a good fit for someone else.
Not really... Eating big breakfasts, medium lunches and small dinners have been around for decades, if not in the US than in Europe for sure. My mom told me how they use to eat like this all the time.
Do you understand the difference between a scientific study and what people do in real life? Just because people have been practicing something for decades doesn't mean it has been scientifically studied or tested. This magazine article is an interpretation of a scientific study published in a journal. I can't find the journal article now, but I get the feeling it wasn't "decades" ago.
This is like the most frustrating thread ever.
I do understand the difference between a scientific study and what people do in real life. Meal timing is personal preference. That is all.
And on another note....if this thread is the most frustrating for you....you might want to stay out of the forums.0 -
0
-
interesting! i'll have to try this out and see how it works for me(: i pretty much have always eating a small breakfast and big dinner, but i'll flip it around!0
-
First of all, this very small study doesn't say that their research was carried out in a controlled environment where the test subjects were monitored 24 hours a day and what they ate was prepared for them. Instead, like so many studies they probably relied on the subjects keeping journals and trusted them to be accurate.
Also in the article is says this "But that doesn’t mean that starting your day with a 700-calorie Cronut will automatically help you lose weight. Instead, shoot for a large, balanced meal that’s high in protein—like eggs, yogurt, or lean meat—to fend off hunger."
This quote from the article makes way more sense. The reason that people tend to eat less when they start the day with a hearty breakfast is because they remain satiated longer and are better able to control their calorie intake for the rest of the day.
There are plenty of people who are successful doing all kinds of things, including skipping breakfast entirely.
What bothers me about all of these studies is that they are very rarely conducted on enough subjects and are very rarely done under controlled circumstances so are really more anecdotal then evidence based and they then get published in a magazine as the next best thing. It's not proof of anything.
Everyone has to do what works for them. If eating a big breakfast helps you meet your calorie and macro goals for the day then by all means Eat breakfast like a king and eat dinner like a pauper. Remember that saying?
But, you may go to bed hungry in which case your sleep will most likely not be quality and you'll struggle with sleep deprivation which has been proven to be a contributor to obesity and poor health in general. Your choice. I'm just saying that this tiny study doesn't prove anything.
This study isn't just published in some random magazine. It was published in the scientific Israeli journal Obesity, as stated in the first few sentences. The magazine published their own interpretation of the results of the study. You implied that the study relies on anecdotal evidence to draw their conclusions and that the study wasn't well controlled. How did you come to that conclusion? This online magazine article barely touches on how they conducted their study. To find that information out, you would have to read the study itself. Science>broscience.
Also, without a link to the study itself, this article is completely meaningless. Also, very small sample size + very short study length = pretty useless for attempting to extrapolate out to the general population.
Oops, I made a mistake then. My bad. Obesity is still a scientific journal. This is not a small sample size for an in person participant experiment. Samples of 30 or greater are needed to be able to make reliable statistical inference. Yes, it is a short study, but when you are doing a study that requires following up and measuring and tracking live participants in-person on a daily basis, it is difficult to a study for a long period of time. These studies need to be funded.
The study doesn't need to be "legitimized" any further. It already passed peer-review and being published. Everyone is implying that because this study is being cited in an online article it is being de-legitimized. Anyone can cite any scientific article.
This would be an interesting study to look at, but again, one study is absolutely meaningless. If this article was talking about a meta analysis of several hundred studies that had this result, that might be worth considering.0 -
Same here.. I feel my day is in control if I start low on breakfast. Also having heavy breakfast, does not stop from feeling hungry later.. As the day goes by, with all the running around, and activities, I feel I need more energy during the day. Also I do not feel very very hungry in the mornings. A cup of tea and 2 slices of bread are good for me till 12 noon. I used to find it weird as everywhere there is so much emphasize on breakfast.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions