Changed goal to TDEE but gained!

Last week I changed my MFP calorie goal to closer to TDEE. Previously my goal was 1200 and I would eat back my exercise calories, at least half of them anyway.

Well, last week I went and changed my goal to 1400 to get a little closer to TDEE. I am 4' 11, and 117lbs. I only do T25 workout and maybe once or twice a month will hop on treadmill for 15-30mins.

Anyway, since I changed my goal to 1400 to 1200, I have gained 1.4lbs! I was steadily losing about .5lb a week. This is so frustrating.
«1

Replies

  • JenMc14
    JenMc14 Posts: 2,389 Member
    Give it time. Your body is adjusting to having more calories.
  • navyrigger46
    navyrigger46 Posts: 1,301 Member
    One week is not enough to make a determination, and you only added 200 cals, it's not that big of a difference. Give it a month and relax.

    Rigger
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Pretty much proves how much you were undereating previously.

    Think and do the math.

    If you were losing 0.5 lb weekly, and we assume fat, that means a deficit daily of 250 calories.

    If you eat 200 more daily, you still have a deficit of 50 calories, so obviously not gaining fat.

    But what it proves is you were very depleted on glucose stores, your body finally got what it needed for the exercise type you do - and loaded up. Glucose stores with water, to the tune of 500 calories is 1 lb.

    But that is also LBM, and that means increased metabolism.

    And now you know one reason why metabolism drops quickly when you diet, almost instant less LBM.
  • jlahorn
    jlahorn Posts: 377 Member
    Same here. 1200+ eating back some exercise calories is how I lose .5 - 1 lb per week.

    Eating TDEE-20% is actually maintenance for me, regardless of the fact that the math and physics there don't really make sense. if I raise my calories to my TDEE, I start gaining. C'est la vie, I guess.
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    I'm always surprised when I see someone who has been on MFP for a long time and lost a lot of weight get surprised/frustrated by what is completely normal weight fluctuation...? I "gain" and "lose" 1-3 lbs 3 times a week. Anyway, if you ate 1400 more calories this week than last week (200*7), that is not enough to cause a 1.4 lb gain. A 1.4 lb gain would need an extra almost 5000 calories. My guess is that you will "lose" 1.4 lbs in the next few days. :flowerforyou: good luck.

    ETA if you were losing 1/2 lb per week on your previous level, I would expect to lose maybe 1/2 per 2-3 weeks if you up your calories by 1400 per week
  • Stef2752
    Stef2752 Posts: 22 Member
    I did the same thing. Went from 1240 calories to 1440. I didn't gain, but also didn't lose anything for an entire month. I was just looking at my weight graph/report on here and noticed the month of no loss and was wondering what that was about, then remembered that was when I upped my cals. Now I'm back to losing 1-1.5 pounds a week. AND it sure feels great to be able to eat a little more!
  • Bekahmardis
    Bekahmardis Posts: 602 Member
    It's okay. I was undereating as well, and it took 3 or 4 weeks for my body to adjust to normal eating again. The weight started to slide back down again. Patience, Padawan. Patience. :)
  • _HeartsOnFire_
    _HeartsOnFire_ Posts: 5,304 Member
    1.4 lbs is probably water weight. Your body can fluctuate 3-5 lbs a day.

    Weight lose takes time. More than a week. Chill.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Same here. 1200+ eating back some exercise calories is how I lose .5 - 1 lb per week.

    Eating TDEE-20% is actually maintenance for me, regardless of the fact that the math and physics there don't really make sense. if I raise my calories to my TDEE, I start gaining. C'est la vie, I guess.

    Gain what exactly?

    And since TDEE means maintenance, if it really was fat being gained, then that means you guessed your activity level wrong and had TDEE wrong.

    Oh, it would take 250 calories daily over TDEE to gain 1 mere pound of fat or LBM in 2 weeks. Anything faster is water weight.
  • MoreBean13
    MoreBean13 Posts: 8,701 Member
    That's normal when you're coming off overly-restricted calories. The best thing you can do is stay off the scale for the next month. It will work itself out by then.

    Nobody ever gained real weight at 1400 calories*, it's just a temporary adjustment.


    *without underlying medical problems.
  • lindustum
    lindustum Posts: 212 Member
    I upped my calories from 1200 to nearly 1850 and I DID NOT GAIN. I initially gained a pound, and that one was gone after a week.
    It is scary and it seems so counter-intuitive at first, but if you are hungry and feel starved (as I did) your body is telling you something. Don't forget that if you're close to your bodyweight, you can't(shouldn't) loose as fast.
  • I also think I have been undereating. I have stuck to 1200 calories for 8 months and finally raised it to 1370 this month. If I go over, I gain "weight". If I go back to eating my normal 1370 or under, I lose it in just a couple of days. Lately I've taken a week off from MFP (for the first time since I started). I refuse to weigh myself more than once a week. It makes me a little less obsessive. Just give it time. :)

    Gaaah the body is odd. Haha
  • ebgbjo
    ebgbjo Posts: 821 Member
    Sorry, I forgot to mention that I am hypothyroid (which isn't regulated properly as they can never get meds just right). This is the only time in my weight loss journey that I have put on weight on weigh in day. I have never felt underfed or anything before. This week has actually been hard getting in the calories to come even close to goal.

    I will plug at this another week, but I don't really want to gain. I should have just kept it at 1200 as a .5lb weight loss is a good weight loss range for someone close to goal.
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    I'm really confused by people suggesting that the OP is under-eating. She is a relatively small person and she says she was eating 1200 plus exercise calories and is now eating 1400 plus exercise calories. Her TDEE without exercise I'm guessing is around 1500 (using TDEE calculator and guessing age)? And it seems she was losing at the 1/2 lb per week level which makes sense to me. Maybe she was eating around 1500 (1200 plus exercise calories) and her TDEE was around 1800 with exercise?

    OP are you trying to lose or maintain?
  • lindustum
    lindustum Posts: 212 Member
    I'm really confused by people suggesting that the OP is under-eating. She is a relatively small person and she says she was eating 1200 plus exercise calories and is now eating 1400 plus exercise calories. Her TDEE without exercise I'm guessing is around 1500 (using TDEE calculator and guessing age)? And it seems she was losing at the 1/2 lb per week level which makes sense to me. Maybe she was eating around 1500 (1200 plus exercise calories) and her TDEE was around 1800 with exercise?

    What? If the TDEE is 1500 and she is eating 1400 PLUS exercise calories then she is eating above the TDEE and thus gaining.
    I understood the OP to eat 1400 without exercise calories back, because that is the TDEE method.
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    Sorry, I forgot to mention that I am hypothyroid (which isn't regulated properly as they can never get meds just right). This is the only time in my weight loss journey that I have put on weight on weigh in day. I have never felt underfed or anything before. This week has actually been hard getting in the calories to come even close to goal.

    I will plug at this another week, but I don't really want to gain. I should have just kept it at 1200 as a .5lb weight loss is a good weight loss range for someone close to goal.

    I think it's really interesting that some people's weight will fluctuate a lot from day to day and others will stay relatively flat.

    Like I said in my previous post, I don't think 1200+ exercise calories seems low for a 4'1" female who is relatively light. I'm never a proponent of huge calorie deficits, especially close to goal, but it doesn't seem like a huge deficit for a 4'11" female. I'm 5'4" and if I want to cut, I would go below 1600 calories, which would be 1200+ exercise calories.

    Good luck OP! I really would expect that 1.4 to go even if you continue at your higher calorie level.
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    I'm really confused by people suggesting that the OP is under-eating. She is a relatively small person and she says she was eating 1200 plus exercise calories and is now eating 1400 plus exercise calories. Her TDEE without exercise I'm guessing is around 1500 (using TDEE calculator and guessing age)? And it seems she was losing at the 1/2 lb per week level which makes sense to me. Maybe she was eating around 1500 (1200 plus exercise calories) and her TDEE was around 1800 with exercise?

    What? If the TDEE is 1500 and she is eating 1400 PLUS exercise calories then she is eating above the TDEE and thus gaining.
    I understood the OP to eat 1400 without exercise calories back, because that is the TDEE method.

    LOL yes but she says eating exercise calories back with the 1200, so I assumed she meant with the 1400 too, or she'd be eating less now than before. Or maybe the same? (1200 plus exercise calories would be more than or equal to 1400 without adding exercise calories). And she never did say TDEE MINUS anything so I was just assuming that she wasn't speaking about the "TDEE method" the way most people do.
  • VorJoshigan
    VorJoshigan Posts: 1,106 Member
    One week? Seriously?! You're going to derail a lifelong eating plan because one week didn't go your way? Your body is not a machine. You will have NO idea what a given input will do long-term until your body adjusts to it, which will almost always take longer than a week.
  • Zina1963
    Zina1963 Posts: 9 Member
    My dietician has told me twice to increase my calorie intake, and I have resisted. The first time I didn't listen, and I only lost 2 lbs in a month. I was eating 1270, sometimes eating back what I exercised. Now I'm going to listen. She wants me to eat 1500-1600 a day, My BMR is 1650, and I've been working out 4-5 times a week. I don't get on the scale at home any more, and I don't go back to see the dietician until Sept 26. All I've been reading on MFP has made me a believer - so I'm going to do what she said, and hope for the best.
  • jlahorn
    jlahorn Posts: 377 Member
    Same here. 1200+ eating back some exercise calories is how I lose .5 - 1 lb per week.

    Eating TDEE-20% is actually maintenance for me, regardless of the fact that the math and physics there don't really make sense. if I raise my calories to my TDEE, I start gaining. C'est la vie, I guess.

    Gain what exactly?

    1.5 lbs over 6 weeks at the TDEE from my FitBit.

    And since TDEE means maintenance, if it really was fat being gained, then that means you guessed your activity level wrong and had TDEE wrong.

    Yeah, I'm not really guessing, I go by my FitBit calculation, which isn't perfect of course but is still a lot more accurate than picking "lightly active" from a checklist.
    Oh, it would take 250 calories daily over TDEE to gain 1 mere pound of fat or LBM in 2 weeks. Anything faster is water weight.

    That's why I've been experimenting in 6-week increments.

    10 months at 1200+some exercise calories = .5 - 1 lb per week weight loss.
    6 weeks at or slightly under FitBit-calculated TDEE = an extra 1.5 lbs that wasn't going away regardless of sodium intake, TOM fluctuations, etc.
    8 weeks now at TDEE-20% = maintenance.

    Meh. It's not so bad.
  • askeates
    askeates Posts: 1,490 Member
    When I changed over to TDEE-20% I was told to be patient. There will be some fluctuation up and down before the real losses will start. About 3-4 weeks, and that was right on the money!
  • MzManiak
    MzManiak Posts: 1,361 Member
    Same here. 1200+ eating back some exercise calories is how I lose .5 - 1 lb per week.

    Eating TDEE-20% is actually maintenance for me, regardless of the fact that the math and physics there don't really make sense. if I raise my calories to my TDEE, I start gaining. C'est la vie, I guess.

    Then... it's not your TDEE. :huh:
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    Same here. 1200+ eating back some exercise calories is how I lose .5 - 1 lb per week.

    Eating TDEE-20% is actually maintenance for me, regardless of the fact that the math and physics there don't really make sense. if I raise my calories to my TDEE, I start gaining. C'est la vie, I guess.

    Gain what exactly?

    1.5 lbs over 6 weeks at the TDEE from my FitBit.

    And since TDEE means maintenance, if it really was fat being gained, then that means you guessed your activity level wrong and had TDEE wrong.

    Yeah, I'm not really guessing, I go by my FitBit calculation, which isn't perfect of course but is still a lot more accurate than picking "lightly active" from a checklist.
    Oh, it would take 250 calories daily over TDEE to gain 1 mere pound of fat or LBM in 2 weeks. Anything faster is water weight.

    That's why I've been experimenting in 6-week increments.

    10 months at 1200+some exercise calories = .5 - 1 lb per week weight loss.
    6 weeks at or slightly under FitBit-calculated TDEE = an extra 1.5 lbs that wasn't going away regardless of sodium intake, TOM fluctuations, etc.
    8 weeks now at TDEE-20% = maintenance.

    Meh. It's not so bad.

    Then the fitbit is over-estimating your TDEE or you are eating more than you think. :)

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/872212-you-re-probably-eating-more-than-you-think
  • highervibes
    highervibes Posts: 2,219 Member
    200 extra calories/day should net you a gain of only 1400 calories per week (which is less than 1/2lb and this is assuming you were eating AT TDEE) Taking into consideration you were losing 1/2 at less calories, at BEST it should have eaten your deficit. This sounds like glycogen stores replenishing. Give it a few weeks before you write it off.
  • tracieangeletti
    tracieangeletti Posts: 432 Member
    It's water weight and it is normal. Frustrating but normal. Friday I was 123.6 and today I was 129.6. I ate at or under my calorie limit all weekend. The culprit? BACON. I eat bacon on the weekends, still fits my diet, and the sodium always makes me retain some water. Don't like seeing the heavier weight on the scale but not quite enough to stop eating my bacon!! lol
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Gain what exactly?

    1.5 lbs over 6 weeks at the TDEE from my FitBit.

    And since TDEE means maintenance, if it really was fat being gained, then that means you guessed your activity level wrong and had TDEE wrong.

    Yeah, I'm not really guessing, I go by my FitBit calculation, which isn't perfect of course but is still a lot more accurate than picking "lightly active" from a checklist.
    Oh, it would take 250 calories daily over TDEE to gain 1 mere pound of fat or LBM in 2 weeks. Anything faster is water weight.

    That's why I've been experimenting in 6-week increments.

    10 months at 1200+some exercise calories = .5 - 1 lb per week weight loss.
    6 weeks at or slightly under FitBit-calculated TDEE = an extra 1.5 lbs that wasn't going away regardless of sodium intake, TOM fluctuations, etc.
    8 weeks now at TDEE-20% = maintenance.

    Meh. It's not so bad.

    Well, the question of what was gained exactly was in reference to water weight or fat, as most people don't know. Same question with losses, except there you can include muscle mass loss with water and fat loss if the deficit is too much. You could be losing 1 lb weekly, and 20% of that could be muscle mass because of bad combo of eating levels, foods, and exercise.

    1.5 x 3500 (assumed fat gain) = 5250 excess calories over TDEE / 6 weeks = 875 weekly surplus / 7 days = 125 daily surplus on average.

    That's the amount of inaccuracy in a day's worth eating and food labels.
    And if any of that was faster water weight gain for glucose, then even less was a true gain of bad weight. Gaining LBM is good, increased metabolism.

    Your FitBit is assuming all non-moving time, sleeping and awake, is at the level of BMR burn, which is not correct as awake burns RMR level.

    Anyway, if you don't have the same BMR as they are using, a decent amount of your time can be inflated calorie burn, by that much easily.

    So your TDEE appears to be probably 100 less than what FitBit is telling you.

    And depending on amount left to lose to healthy weight, 20% may be too much really too, risking muscle mass again.
  • joshdann
    joshdann Posts: 618 Member
    remember that TDEE, by every method available, is inherently inaccurate. It's a good ballpark, but you can't expect to be right on the money based on an impersonal formula. In reality, there is no real accurate formula. Muscles get more efficient or less efficient based on activity and strength level. BMR changes slightly every day. Water weight changes things. Chemical balances cause slightly different efficiencies in nutrient absorption on a daily basis. It may be only a handful of calories in one direction or another, but when you're talking about a 200-calorie change to hit the bullseye of some mythical number... it just doesn't work that way. Not to mention that your activity level is almost certainly different from day to day, and calorie counting is an imperfect science at best. One cup of milk will have a different calorie count from the next. A box of raisins might not weigh *exactly* the number of grams it says on the back. Chickens from one farm may have a gram or two more or less protein per 4 oz breast... and a breast is almost never 4oz on the nose. again, just it's just a few calories this way or that, but overall it is simply impossible to be perfectly accurate.

    You have to pay attention to what you body is telling you. TDEE is an *estimate* and should be treated as such. Don't buy the hype. Use it properly, as an estimate, and remember that calorie counting is also an estimate. If you're not hungry at 1200 calories per day, you're getting enough of the vital nutrients, and you're seeing the results you want in BF%, the image in the mirror, and overall weight... why change it? On the other hand, if your body is telling you it needs more food, then by all means, feed it!
  • ebgbjo
    ebgbjo Posts: 821 Member
    Thank you everyone for your feedback. I greatly appreciate it. I am going to wait another week or two and if weight continues to go up, I will adjust my calories back down some.

    Yes, I am trying to lose weight. My goal is 107, as of right now. I am NOT looking for huge weight loss gains each week. That just isn't realistic, or healthy, for someone at my height and weight.