We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Does this sound right?! Bikers & Runners

charcharhaver
charcharhaver Posts: 9
edited February 4 in Fitness and Exercise
Does this sound right?! Maybe people who bike or run can help.

I posted before about eating back exercise calories and being skeptical of what I'm burning (I don't have a heart monitor, so I'm conservative with my exercise calories). So I've been using a new app to track my exercise, and it says that I'm burning ~575-600 calories per hour at 18mph on the bike.

I mostly bike and run. That means that this week, here are my exercise calories:

(I'm a 5"4', 120lb woman)

Sunday: 1156cal (2hrs biking)
Monday: 548cal (1hr biking...a bit slower than typical pace due to biking w/ a friend)
Tuesday: 1478cal (2.5hrs biking)
Today: 829 (1.25hrs biking @ 639 cal, 30min jog at 190 cal)

I used to use my sports watch to determine distance and speed, and then plug that into MFP or other online calculators. I usually log 75% of whatever those calculate b/c I heard they over estimate. But does this new app sound right?

Replies

  • GetSoda
    GetSoda Posts: 1,267 Member
    probably overestimates by at least double
  • chaoticrunner
    chaoticrunner Posts: 32 Member
    That sounds about right, especially at the speed and duration you're going. Biking really does burn a lot. Can't say anything about the running though, just not my thing!
  • cwaters120
    cwaters120 Posts: 354 Member
    I can only attest to the jogging as I don't bike, but the jog looks right. :smile:
  • naomijuliette96
    naomijuliette96 Posts: 153 Member
    tuesday and today don't sound completely accurate, but probably not by a ton. I'm a competitive road cyclist, and over the course of 2.5 hours i've burnt up to 2000 cal! I've also burnt 574 calories on a 20 minute all out effort, I know this is completely accurate as I was hooked up to machines doing a VO2 max test in an athletic testing facility... I'm always amazed at how many calories can be burnt while cycling! Running... not so much
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Sounds about right for cycling at a decent speed, I'm bigger/heavier, riding a hybrid and burn approx. 700/hour on a quick ride.

    I use a HRM for my calorie counts but find that the Runkeeper app on my phone (used for tracking distance) isn't too different for calorie estimates if you are looking for a no cost option.

    As for running.... At my age? You must be joking!!
  • charcharhaver
    charcharhaver Posts: 9
    Thanks for the comparisons and app advice. I used to just be a runner and saw my fitness explode when I started biking. I'm on a road bike, usually in a hard gear while still maintaining a high cadence on flat terrain with a few 2-5 minute hills that I repeat. I do sprint intervals at least once a week. Not as crazy as some roadies like you it seems!
  • Chieflrg
    Chieflrg Posts: 9,097 Member
    I use a HRM and go all out on both shoes and wheels. There is no doubt I burn more running than biking.

    All out running for a sprint of 60 minutes my heart rate averages just around 92% of max HR.

    All out pedal pushing of 60 minutes my HR is 82% of my max.
  • charcharhaver
    charcharhaver Posts: 9
    Awesome! I can't run with as much intensity as I bike. My knees would explode! So that's why my run calories will always lower than my bike calories.
  • michellekicks
    michellekicks Posts: 3,624 Member
    I am bigger than you are and would burn 300 calories doing a slow run of 11 min/mi for 30 minutes. If I run hard at closer to 8:00/mi I'll burn about 700/hour.

    EDIT: 5'7" @ 160 lbs.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories